Showing posts with label #blacklivesmatter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #blacklivesmatter. Show all posts

Thursday, December 2, 2021

The Dojo's Top 10 Events of 2021 Encapsulated in Film

 




INTRODUCTION

            As another year ends, it is time for The Sociologist’s Dojo to once again rattle of the top ten sociological films of the year. However, because we are still in a pandemic, (which now has more Variants than a Marvel Character; Hello, Omicron!) and the  altered release schedules of films, coupled with the limited the number of films I saw in the theater due to COVID self-protection; I decided this year, to once again, give readers a list of 10 events of 2021 and the films that encapsulate them. This is obviously not an exhaustive list of events, nor even the ones that are “The Most Sociological, but hopefully represent some of the noteworthy happenings of 2021 and the films that epitomize their essence; either directly or tangentially. With each event I will give a brief explanation of the event, followed by how the film(s) relate to each incident. This list is obviously limited by personal bias, the films I have seen, and my own specialties in Sociology.

            Violence, death, manufactured moral panic(s) Infrastructure wins (sort of), billionaires in space, a Texas abortion law that is right out of a Atwood novel, the end of a high profile conservatorship, and a small little insurrection that nearly transformed our fragile republic into a dictatorship; 2021 has been just as wild and uncertain as its older brother. Below is a curated list of films that, when watched together, gives one a sense of living through 2021, whether we want to relive it, or not.    Enjoy!

 

10)   Rittenhouse and Arbery Cases:

Triple Feature: 

Whose Streets (2017),  



Candyman (2021)

On Nov 19th Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of killing two people and injuring a third during a Black Lives Matter protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.  The trial and decision were criticized for bias toward the defendant. From not being able to call the deceased victims, to Rittenhouse himself being able to hand pick jurors from a tumbler, all of procedural aspects of the trial seemed to be in Rittenhouse’s favor. Yet, while as some legal scholars have pointed out that everything that happened in the case was technically legal, any racial scholar worth their salt will point out the glairing prejudicial legal procedures that repeatedly favor white defendants. Additionally, even outside of the technical legality of this decision, the systemic allowance of an underaged person to be radicalized by a social media call to arms, gain access to an assault rifle, carry it across state lines to “defend” property that is not his own, nor was asked to protect by the owners, should be illegal…full stop.

  The defendants in the Ahmaud Arbrey murder, on the other hand, were convicted only after many barriers to their guilty verdict were circumvented. First, there was a reluctance to prosecute the men involved until the video of the murder was released to the media, sparking national attention. It should be noted that it was the high-profile nature of this case that led to the conviction of Aubrey’s killers, as several other cases with the same or similar circumstances have historically led to acquittal. 

The Rittenhouse acquittal, and the systemic barriers in the Aubrey case, point to the succinct message of  Naomi Zack (2015) in her book White Privilege Black Rights; that these disparities are not about white privilege, it is about the denial of black rights. All defendants should be treated with the respect and caution to convict that Rittenhouse was afforded, and the fact that so many are not, is a denial of their rights. 

            To illustrate these two cases, a triple feature is necessary. Whose Streets (2017), a documentary about the rise of police brutality protests after the death of Michael Brown. This helps to understand the context of the Rittenhouse Case, and the backdrop of which the events unfolded.  American History X, (1998) is included to acknowledge the ties Rittenhouse, the McMichaels and Bryan have with white supremacy ideology and groups.  Nia Decosta’s Candyman (2021) is a great example of the recontextualization of black pain, leading to the manifestation of a vengeful spirit. In the film, several real-life victims of racist violence become a part of the Candyman “hive” to help exact retribution on those that wronged them. I would imagine, in the Candyman universe, Aubery is now a member of the horde.

 

9) Simone Biles backlash at the Olympics:

 Bamboozled (2000)   


            The fundamental issue regarding the backlash that gymnastic superstar Simone Biles received for dropping out of a majority of her events in the 2021 Olympics to focus on mental and physical health has to do with race and the perceived public ownership of Black women’s bodies. This is the psychological fallout of the practice of 400+ years of slavery that still frames Black people as being in the service of white people. According to Rhoden (2006), regardless of how much these individual athletes get paid, if their primary job is to perform for the entertainment of white people, which are disproportionally in positions of authority and a majority of their fanbase, the black athletes are perpetuating the relationships that were cultivated during slavery.

            The messaging of “shut up and perform” is illustrated in Spike Lee’s controversial satire, Bamboozled (2000) which, while leaning into problematic racist stereotypes, presents the performative aspects of black culture for a white audience in stark detail, outside of the glorified mechanism of professional sports.

 

8) Manufactured Moral Panic-Part 1 Vaccines

Network (1976)

 

In the past year, governments and pharmaceutical companies have come together to produce a vaccine for Sars-Cov-2. Yet, regardless of abundant vaccine stocks, the Coronavirus is still with us. Part of this is through the spread of vaccine misinformation by major networks like Fox News, whose empty-headed, mouth breathing pundits tout fear and panic through information that is both vague and misleading. Often, they express hesitancy and outrage over mask and vaccine mandates, even when their own company has stricter rules than the ones outlined by the federal government. This is minimizing the likelihood of heard immunity and has allowed Covid-19 to mutate repeatedly into more virulent and resistant strains.

The 1976 film Network satirizes the way in which the way media companies can manufacture consent (or in this case discontent) to their point of view for profit. The Oscar winning speech given by Ned Beatty towards the end of the film is easily applicable today.

 

7) Manufactured Moral Panic- Part 2 Critical Race Theory

Fahrenheit 451 

                      (1966)

 

                      (2018)

 

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a legal scholarship put forth by Kimberlee Crenshaw, Cornell West and others that identifies how the systemic aspects of racism are built into our social institutions providing built in benefits and barriers for individuals based upon race. Initially, CRT was established to understand legal disparities in arrest, sentencing severity and other aspects of the Criminal Justice System. This mechanism has since been applied to other social institutions pointing to the disparities in experience between people who are white and people of color in our society.  This form of scholarship is not being taught in elementary schools, high schools, or barely in undergraduate college courses. However, this became the focus of right-wing moral panic when their news outlets fueled this false narrative for their own political purposes for the 2022 election. Instead, what these people are outraged about beyond their own attempt at acquiring more political power, is the shift in presenting American history in more accurate ways, outside of the flag waving nationalism common in the past. Thus, opponents to CRT: Firstly, don’t know what it is, and secondly, do not want to reckon with a more precise accounting of history outside of the socialized propaganda meant to pacify the public.

This panic has become such a raging fire that late in 2021, Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin won on a platform of banning CRT in schools. This has accelerated to actual members of a Pennsylvania school board desiring  to ban and burn any book with “offensive” content.          As I said, when I heard about this story: “Time to go back to Bradbury.” So, feel free to choose either the 1966 or 2018 version. Both will get the point across, and remind you of world we are about two steps away from living in.

 

6) Brittany Spears' Conservatorship Ends

Double Feature: 

Teen Spirit (2018) 


The Neon Demon (2016)


Bonus: Crossroads (2002) (because…Obviously)


The perception of celebrity in our culture often obfuscates the reality celebrities are living in.  The media and the entertainment industry, along with fan culture, has ideas about what they thought Brittany Spears life was like… and everyone was wrong.  Brought to the media’s attention this year through the hashtag #FreeBrittany, the public learned that Britany has been under a conservatorship by her father for most of her career. That conservatorship which is usually reserved for individuals without the capacity to care for themselves, has confined Britany for decades. 

The Conservatorship officially ended on Nov 10th of this year,  but it is how we as a public respond to this, and whether or not we commodify her again.  The commodification of celebrity culture, and the dangers that such an industry on the performer, is interestingly depicted in the Elle Fanning helmed Teen Spirit, and Nicolas Winding Refin satirical psychological horror film The Neon Demon.  Readers must watch the films in the order I have provided as the former gives a sense of Brittany’s origins, while the latter captures what we did to Brittany when she was consumed by popular culture.

 

5) The ‘Build Back Better’ Bill Fight:

2012 (2009)


            Every year that the Congressional Budget Office releases the numbers for the budget each fiscal yearn I have always cringed and the hundreds of billions of dollars going towards weapons manufacturing and distribution; while so much less was funneled to needed infrastructure repair. We tend to only make drastic changes to infrastructure after a crisis (Minnesota Bridge collapse circa 2010), and historically, infrastructure was always considered a back burner issue.  Yet, once Biden narrowly defeated Trump in 2020, there was some hope with a Democratic congress and a Democratic executive that we could begin the repairing of infrastructure in Biden’s first year in office. Then the fuckery began. First, Biden attempted to pass a combined 6 Trillion dollar package full of very popular social service spending programs like free community college and paid family leave. Unfortunately, this was deemed “too socialist” and both were gutted in the negotiation process; whittling down the spending package to a poultry 1.2 Trillion. Then, to please some energy lobbyist Senators Krysten Sinema and Joe Manchin stalled the bill for several weeks to gain and flex political clout with lobbyists.

            There is no feature length film about infrastructure inspection or infrastructure repair because, as John Oliver points out in a 2015 segment on Infrastructure, there is nothing abut infrastructure that is interesting or sexy. Yet, Hollywood does have a lot of disaster films, and the one thing that disaster films love to do, is to destroy infrastructure. I picked the 2009 film 2012 because it features a spectacularly irrational sequence of infrastructure destruction where the highway overpass crumbles which sets off a sequence of events that lead to buildings collapsing around a small single engine plane and limousine trying to escape.

 

4) US Pulls out of Afghanistan:

Triple Feature: 

Syriana (2005) 

Three Kings (1999)

 The Stoning of Soraya M (2009)

 

In late August 2021, the last plane left Afghanistan officially ending US military involvement for the last 20 years. The troop removal was no handled well, as many people were killed trying to get to the airport or trampled trying to get on to planes. This chaos and confusion is analogous to the ending of the first Gulf War in the 1990’s depicted in the David O Russell film Three Kings. Additionally, the US government acknowledged a drone striking that took place (which they first reported was a confirmed terrorist strike, was later changed, revealing that the strike was upon a family of innocent civilians (with several children))against a vehicle going to the airport to provide people with water.  A dramatization of a drone strike was a part of the 2009 film Syriana, complete with the confusion and uncertainty that comes with it. Additionally, because the US left in such a haphazard way, a lot of the progress, especially for women and girls in the country since the US Military took over. Now, with the Taliban again in control, there is an expected social regression and an erosion of the rights women have gained over the last two decades.  With that fear in mind, I chose the 2009 drama The Stoning of Soraya M as a reminder that the vicious attack that is in the end of that film, could make a comeback in the region. 

 

3) Billionaires…in…Space!

Elysium (2013) 


During the Summer months of 2021, three billionaires were in a race with each other to see who could be the first and go the furthest into “Space”. I use “space” in quotes here because when we colloquially use the word “space” we typically mean outer space beyond the earth’s atmosphere. This did not happen, not one of three billionaires (Musk, Branson, or Bezos) went to outer space. Instead, they all had varying degrees and times of weightlessness through a sub orbital flight; and unfortunately, they all came back.

Upon their return, astronauts that have been to space have come back with a greater sense of humanism.  Seeing the earth this way gave them an epiphany about the importance of environmentalism and reducing human conflicts. It put into perspective for them that we have but one world, and we better preserve it. People who were widely expecting the earth to give emotional catharsis to these sentient flesh sacks of money were sadly mistaken. First, Jeff Bezos tone deafly thanking his Amazon employees, many of them under sweatshop like conditions with a history of union busting, for making his space flight possible. Then, realizing the media expected him to have the aforementioned epiphany, Bezos made a thinly veiled speech on the commercialization of space and use it to get rid of trash and pollution.  

 This is the result of the defunding of the space program over the last 20 years, leaving space to now be commercialized by rich white dudes with a god complex. This is perfectly illustrated by Neill Blomkamp’s 2013 film Elysium that depicts earth as an overpopulated polluted trash planet in which the rich live on a space station in the earth’s orbit with the very best medical technology in the universe.

 

2) Texas Abortion Law:

Double Feature: 

Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Always (2020)

 Unpregnant (2020) 


In 2021, Texas circumvented Roe vs Wade and brought challenge to this “super precedent” that was ignored by The Supreme Court. The Texas state law allows for individuals to bring civil cases against anyone helping a woman obtain an abortion, regardless of cases of rape or incest. Suddenly, everyone from the abortion doctor to the lift driver that brought her to the clinic could be sued by Texas civilians (not even in the same county) for $10,000 plus court fees.  In the words of Justice Sotomayor, this has allowed all Texans to become bounty hunters.

As of this writing, oral arguments have begun in the Mississippi Supreme Court case that could further erode the protections women have altogether, and at first glance, it is not looking good. Therefore, I wanted to put on this list a pair of films that speak to the Abortion Process and the power of women supporting other women through such a difficult decision. The first, Eliza Hittman’s Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Always is a drama about Autumn and her cousin, Skylar, traveling from Pennsylvania to New York for Autumn to get the procedure. The story is poignant with sobering pragmatism. The Second film, Unpregnant, while also dealing with the same subject matter, is a road movie friendship comedy. Both films treat the actual procedure with care, grace, and dignity. Though it is tempered wit the fact that all four women across these two films could have been subject to prosecution if any of this happened in Texas and a handful of other states.   Remember, Abortion is a Human Right for anyone with a uterus.

 

1) Jan 6th Insurrection:

The Purge: Election Year (2016) 


I have already written exclusively about the January 6th insurrection earlier in the year, focusing on the impact of media consumption and whiteness on protestors; ultimately leading to the events that unfolded. As we approach the one-year anniversary of the event, we are seeing just how deep this plot goes. So far, the investigation has handed down indictment to several of the rioters, many of whom were in denial that they would even be prosecuted. The investigation has also implicated several members of congress who were involved in the planning of the coup attempt (even so far as giving guided tours to the insurrectionist just days before the event) no one has yet been arrested or removed from office.

The only cinematic choice to represent the events on Jan 6th is the third installment of The Purge franchise Election Year, primarily because the film ends with the Anti-Purge candidate winning the election, outlawing Purge Nights, and as a result, purge supporters staged violent uprisings across the country, protesting election results leading to the fourth film The Forever Purge (2021). While I still have some hope that we are several years away from this becoming an actual reality, the end of this film was a little too close for comfort.

  


CONCLUSION

Going into 2022, I am less optimistic about all aspects of society, and our ability to weather the storm.  From the approaching midterms to Covid’s consistent threats, to environmental depletion 2022 just like the last two years before might be yet another brick out of the wall of civilization. Therefore, it is important to remember human and civil rights for all people and understand your place in the world. We fight as hard as we can for as long as we can. If you need to personalize these collectivist ideas in order to support it, so be it. But here, in the last essay of 2021, I leave you with the parting words of The 12th Doctor: “laugh hard, run fast, be kind.”   See you all in 2022.  

 


REFERENCES

 

Roden, William C. 2006. Forty Million Dollar Slaves: The Rise, Fall, and Redemption of the Black Athlete  New York: Three Rivers Press

 

Zack, Naomi 2015. White Privilege and Black Rights: The Injustice of US Police Racial Profiling and Homicide New York: Rowman and Littlefield  


Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Sociology Alert!: Filmmaking and Storytelling Influences on a Political Coup

 



                On Jan 6th 2021, a Coup was attempted in the United States, as a group of Donald Trump supporters breached the Capitol building in Washington DC, following a rally. The rally in question, was held by Donald Trump to continue stoking fear and falsity regarding the results of the 2020 election; which he lost.  Upon his order and incessant urging, the crowd predominantly filled with white men and women stormed the Capitol, broke down windows, forced open doors and began looting. At the end of the hours long siege, 5 people were dead including one police officer.  While the full scope and repercussions from this have still yet to be fully realized, as of this writing, over 80 protestors have been arrested, and there are discussions of Trump’s removal from office. A lot of analysis is coming in from several sources as to the causes and socio-political paradigm shifts that have happened due to these events.

 Given the nature and focus of this blog, I am interested in the way our consumption of media, film and popular culture is incorporated into a person’s (white) privilege; allowing these insurrectionists to believe in a lack of consequences for such actions as storming the capitol and looting; as well as being both delusional and oblivious to one’s own wrongdoing, that it leads to public self-incrimination through social media posts.  As I have argued in the past, pop culture is a form of soft power because it gets integrated into our general knowledge and helps to shape behavior and expectations which, beyond the typical dynamics of social groups and their behavior, explain a lot of behavior that we would identify as irrational and inexplicable otherwise.  Thus, it is through the consumption of film and popular culture that partially contributes to the mindset, expectations, and assumed consequences of the insurgents on the Capitol. However, before we get into the way film and popular culture impacted the behavior and expectations of the seditionists on Jan 6th , we need to do some basic sociological group behavior table setting.

 


SOCIOLOGICAL BASICS OF GROUP BEHAVIOR

            Much of the events on Jan 6th can be broadly understood with the basics of group and crowd behavior: such as Group Think, Diffusion of Responsibility, Emotional Contagion, and collective effervescence.

Crowd Behavior and its motivators  

Crowd Behavior is the action and behaviors of people in groups where the result of physical proximity, and the protection and contagion of the group’s  individual behaviors, begin to “act out of the ordinary” from routine standards of demeanor, becoming more explosive and unpredictable. This makes crowd behavior a general potential threat to the social order. Thus, when people are in a crowd that is single minded and particularly motivated (as the Trump protestors were) their actions can clearly become erratic due to the social psychological trifecta of Group think, emotional contagion and the diffusion of responsibility.

Group think is the social psychological explanation for collective behavior among others within society.  Group think is achieved when an individual believes or follows in mindset, or in behavior, the understandings or actions of a particular group that they are a part of, or one which they desire membership.

 Monte Bute (2015)[1] points out that stereotyping and scapegoating flow out of group think, and this is certainly true of the far-right rebellion on Jan 6th. For 5 years, feelings of xenophobia, multiple facets of racism, and ethnocentrism have been sowed by Donald Trump and his ilk; fueling the generations long history of systemic, institutional, and cultural discrimination, present since the founding of the United States, to the point of the deranged despotism of this single act. The racist motivations of the would be usurpers, and the racially  inconsistent response by police officers that challenged them, maintains the powerful foundation of anti-black and brownness in the US.

Additionally, group think causes a lack of individualized critical thinking resulting in a herd mentality.  Individuals become swept up in the movement and trajectory of the crowd, without reason or understanding of the group’s actions and or consequences; a result that is compounded by the diffusion of responsibility and emotional contagion. Diffusion of responsibility is the process by which individuals relinquish feelings of responsibility for their actions to an authority. In the case of Jan 6th, many of the actions performed by the mob upon the Capitol building, were rationalized by them as acceptable because Donald Trump encouraged them to do it[2]. This was understood in the now classic Stanley Milgram experiment, which found that when presented with an authority figure, individuals often shift the psychological blame for their own actions onto them.   

At the same time that the crowd is diffusing the responsibility for their actions, they are also getting swept up in the collective emotions of the crowd. Emotional Contagion is the idea that within a large enough crowd, emotions become contagious and spread through a crowd like wildfire. Fear in an individual, becomes panic in a crowd. Personal anger transforms into group rage.  The election protestors in front of The White House on Jan 6th , had their emotions whipped up by the fiery rhetoric of their deified false prophet; who’s words lit the fuse to violence and death at the Capitol. 

As the action escalated beyond the control of common sense and law enforcement, the ‘beer-back rebellion’ was thriving through collective effervescence. Collective Effervescence, coined by Emile Durkheim in his book Elementary Forms of Religious Life, is the unity one feels to the group; allowing the communication of the same thought and participation in the same action.  Through this sense of unity, illegal violent behavior became normalized.

 

MEDIA MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE

 

            The media as an agent of socialization, ushering us through the social learning process, not only tells us what has value, what is normal, and what we should believe; it also gives us knowledge without experience.  The media often fills in the gaps between our experiential knowledge and our formal education. What we do not learn from those two main sources is often supplemented by the knowledge we draw from the media. This results in a fair amount of our knowledge, and the source of our “common sense”; by which we make both arbitrary and important decisions, is coming from the media.  It is very humbling to audit your everyday knowledge only to discover that many of the truths that you cling to, are based on a point of view that is shaped by ads, television shows and films.  How much of what you know about deep sea crab fishing is based on the Discovery channel show The Deadliest Catch? How much do you know about the operations of the CIA (or other government agencies) because you watched a few espionage films?  What complicates this issue even further is the way that the media, as an agent of socialization, is used as a recruitment tool for occupations, military service, and brand loyalty. Since the media is a powerful tool in our society; institutions and corporations are trying to shape the knowledge we get from the media to increase their numbers, both in personnel and profits. Therefore, by accident and design, the media becomes a foundational part of how we see the world.

 


THE FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS OF FILMMAKING AND STORYTELLING

            For the last 20 years both the amount and rate of media consumption has increased considerably. People in the US are watching more, at a faster rate. The stay-at-home orders and the lockdown of businesses due to the COVID 19 pandemic, has only increased these numbers with the average American spending 12-15 hours on social media during the pandemic in 2020. Add to this an 79% increase in social media profiles since 2008, and most people are watching something almost every moment of everyday.  This impacts the way that we interact with and perceive the world.

            Filmmaking is a form of entertainment predicated on the development and sustainability of false consciousness (The Marxian belief in a social position that is untrue.) for the run time of the film. Cleverly labeled “The suspension of disbelief,” it allows for fantastic circumstances and events to be accepted by the audience.  That acceptance is easier the more media people consume, the normalization of filmmaking and storytelling structures. Due to generations of media consumption, we have come to expect these patterns, regardless of the industries attempts at nuance. Typically, protagonists are going to succeed and antagonists will fail, whatever the struggles between them.  Going into a Marvel film you already know, by the nature of storytelling, that the Avengers are going to win; its just a matter of how, and how long it takes to achieve.  Additionally, because they are framed as protagonists, we support their endeavors and justify their actions, no matter how cruel, misguided, or dangerous they might seem. The unfortunate result of this normalization of storytelling, is that we all begin to believe that since we are the protagonists of our own stories, we rationalize and justify our behavior so that we always come out the hero; regardless of any objective truth. This is also problematized by the structure of storytelling itself.

            A film is always a snapshot in time. The story that unfolds on screen is precise and exacting. It only shows the audience enough for the advancement of the plot, or emotional investment of the characters to achieve its thematic goals. From an economic pragmatist perspective, Filmmaking costs money, they would not waste money on a shot that wasn’t necessary to the completion of the story. This is why many films do not show the drudgery of daily living (traveling from one location to another, eating, using the restroom etc.) unless that is a story focus. The audience is often dropped “in media res”, an industry term to mean “In the middle of things”. You don’t know what came before, you just start at an arbitrary “beginning” based upon a screenwriter’s whimsey.  Similarly, the film ends at a particular moment; concluding the story, but often allowing the audience to fill in the gaps for what came after. For example, at the end of most romantic comedies (which usually end with a wedding) we assume that the protagonist and their new spouse will have lived “happily ever after.”; even if the circumstances, if placed in reality, would not have played out the same way.  Likewise, any revolutionary action we witness in film is further dramatized with the audience’s assumption of its success.  We assume when the film cuts to black that our revolutionary protagonists prevailed, because we have been conditioned to root for seditious, treasonous vigilantism in every media genre. The toppling of order and control is romanticized as a wish fulfillment fantasy. The idea that your life can fundamentally change through glorified actions is very satisfying storytelling, but it doesn’t work in reality. Moral murkiness is both entertaining and compelling writing, as Drama is captivating, energizing, and exciting, unless this is all happening to us. Where film stops, life keeps going. 

           


 

    REVOLUTIONS: AS SEEN ON TV

            The overall increase in media consumption, and use of media in the understanding of our social world, causes the unnecessary result of individuals dramatizing their life.  Erving Goffman was one of the first Sociologists to talk about this through dramaturgy. A dramatic analysis of society in his famed dissertation, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. He maintained that we attempt to control how we are perceived by others. We achieved this by controlling “impressions that we give off” through our dress, language, hobbies, mannerism etc., in hopes to maintain a desired image (Goffman 1959).  Today, much of our ideas for that image are manipulated through our consumption of advertisements and general media, while performance of our “impressions” has expanded into social media spaces.  Likes, repost and retweets are the identity currency now, through which we cultivate a self -identity that heavily mirrors the media that we consume.  This can account for the number of people whom, on Jan 6th participated in the protest and later coup style riot as if they were going to a NFL football game and tailgating party; proudly wearing face paint and colorful costumes.  Not only are they dressing and behaving for the camera (with which they will also upload evidence to social media), they were treating political rallies, and subsequent mob behavior like the end of a “big game”,  that they lost.

It is these Durkheimianly profane actions, along with all of the group behaviors mentioned previously, fueled by the false consciousness of storytelling, that results in people believing that their actions will not have consequences. After the mob was dispersed many were seen banally discussing the events in hotel lobbies, while posting pictures of the event to social media; oblivious to any perceived wrongdoing and potential repercussions. These are the collective threads of white privilege.

             


WHITE PRIVILEGE: MASKS A COUP IN CLOTHING OF REVOLUTION

 

The basic definition of white privilege is the individual, structural, cultural, social and historical advantages/ lack of barriers provided to an individual based upon the color of their skin (or its implication) which results in easier successful achievement whether intended or unintended within a society. The use of the term privilege is often criticized in the literature because: A. people that received it often do not recognize it. B. The “privileges” that white people receive are how all people should be treated. Some have argued that we need to move away from using the term privilege, and instead, use the phrase “denial of rights” to connote the inequity that exists (Zack 2015).  Yet, for those of us that teach about white privilege, comparison examples are always helpful.  Thus, the events of Jan 6th, are often armored by White Privilege for many of its participants, not because they will not face consequences for their actions, but because those consequences will be far lighter, and more lenient than if the crowd was full of People of color, especially Black or Latinx folks.

Since the events of Jan 6th, to highlight forms of white privilege through differential treatment, many commentators, pundits and scholars have juxtaposed the treatment of the seditious rioters at the Capitol with the treatment of peaceful Black Lives Matter Protests for racial justice to end police violence against Black people.  The stark differences have led to a renewed criticism of police and discretionary justice they employ based upon race.  Additionally, as of this writing, many of the arrests that have been made are for lesser charges than those that could be brought against the individuals in question. 

One of the more obscure social psychological benefits of white privilege is the ability to be treated as an individual and not as a collective group.  Regardless of who is arrested, what they are charged with and what their sentence might be, it will never change the understanding that one white person’s actions do not reflect the actions of all white people.  While this principle should be applied to all people regardless of race, it is not. Likewise, the ability to perceive your admitted ‘revolutionary’ actions as not only being morally just, but patriotic is often fueled by our media consumption. For example, the 30+ year syndication of the “reality based” drama Cops, and how it has perpetuated the reinforcement of racist and classist stereotypes among individuals that do not have daily interactions with people of a different class or racial background. It is this kind of programing that contributes to a justification for the actions of police officers among white communities. It is not much of a stretch to see, that such a steady diet of shows and films that reinforced the criminalization of blackness (of which there are many) inevitably lead to people believing that Police officers are on their side because they are white; as one of the Trumpian “liberators” stated in a quote to a Nation reporter:  “This is not America. They’re shooting at us. They’re supposed to shoot at BLM, but they’re shooting the patriots.”

 


CONCLUSION

We have been told through media to be the protagonists of our own stories. We are conditioned to want love interests with interesting backstories and action set pieces for our vacations. All of this is done to manufacture a brand for ourselves and share that brand through social media.  This causes us to have a cinematic and spectator outlook upon life and the events within it. Yet, it is through the added prism of white privilege that toxifies this cinematic dramaturgy that we find ourselves in. The various protections of white privilege allow the false consciousness generated by cinematic storytelling to go unchecked. Resulting in groups of people interacting in the world with the frivolity of watching a movie.  The unfortunate result, as seen in the events of the attempted coup on Jan 6th 2021, is groups of people with such a lack of self-awareness that they view their treasonous sedition, as patriotic entertainment. 

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Burle, Monte 2015.  How to Recognize the Dangers of Group Think The Society Pages  https://thesocietypages.org/monte/2015/09/05/how-to-recognize-the-dangers-of-groupthink/

 

Goffman, Erving 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.  New York: Anchor Books.

 

Zack, Naomi 2015. White Privilege Black Rights        



[2] Because of this Trump can be charged, once leaving office, with the inciting of a riot. 


Wednesday, December 23, 2020

The Dojo's Ten Films that Encapsulate 2020

 

 


In this shit year, there has been many casualties both personal, (as of this writing over 325,000 dead from COVID-19) and industrial (various economic crises). One of those casualties has been the film and television industry. Even before the Coronavirus ravaged our planet, movie theaters and the film going experience has diminished. Today, movie theaters are on the life support of the big budget tentpole films of our monoculture.  Once COVID-19 became the 21st century plague, theater chains[1] across the country began the nebulous cycle of shut down, open with heavy restrictions on capacity, proximity, and amenities, until the infection rates rose, then shut down again. As the industry scrambled to figure out the best way through this crisis, there were fights between creatives and studio executives:  about pay, residuals, release dates, and control over the final product.  Then, in an industry shaking move, AT&T (parent company of Warner Bros Studios and HBO) decided to place all of their 2020 and 2021 slate of films on the streaming service HBOMAX, around the same time as its release in theaters. This decision seems prudent and practical given the context of COVID-19. With the world in lockdown a lot of the year, and the US going through a holiday wave of Coronavirus spikes, streaming has been a coping mechanism for a lot of people; Tiger King, The Mandalorian, LoveCraft Country, The Crown and the Great British Baking show; all are being consumed at a rapid pace through a variety of streaming applications. Pre pandemic, we consumed an average of 16 hours of streaming content a week. Since the lockdowns began, that number has increased to an average of 8 hours a day (This includes all content: tv, music, film). This change, along with the aforementioned shut down of theaters, has led to a 79% drop in the box office from 2019-2020. At the end of 2020, we’ll see the box office top out at 2 billion dollars compared to last year’s 10-billion-dollar gross. Thus, due to this cultural, social, and economic calamity, I cannot write a piece about the Top 10 Sociological films of 2020. Instead, I have decided to curate a list of 10 films that collectively encapsulate the events and feelings of 2020.   Enjoy!

 

10-Wildfires- Only the Brave (2017)


 

In January, and later in the year, wildfires devastated both Australia and the West Coast of the United States. Only the Brave is the story about the Granite Mountain Hot Shots who fought the Yarnell Hill Fire in Jun 2013.  While this story is about career fire fighters, a lot of the firefighting, especially in California is done through prison labor. Prisoners from men’s and women’s prisons work on the front lines for less than $2 an hour; and up until recently in California they could not get a job as a firefighter upon their release.  Much of the possible destruction of the 2020 wildfires were abated by those who have been discarded by many and monetized by heartless system.

 

9- Impeachment-All the President’s Men (1976)

 


The Impeachment trial of Donald Trump dominated the first few weeks of this year. Accused of an Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Justice by the House and was acquitted by the Senate on February 5, 2020 in a vote that was along party lines. A film that sums up this event of 2020 (yes, it really did happen in 2020) is the political thriller, All the President’s Men, that details the investigation into the Nixon’s Administrations involvement in the Watergate scandal.  Just as the Watergate investigation implicated behaviors of Obstruction and Abuse of power causing Nixon to resign before Impeachment proceeding could begin,  The Mueller Report (on the possible collusion in the 2016 election) determined that while there was a lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute Trump; predominately due to a lack of bureaucratic follow-through (meaning that Obstructionist behaviors were attempted, but never completed) rather than innocence.

 

8- COVID-19  * Double Feature*  Outbreak (1995) and Contagion (2011)




 

The deadliest disease of this generation, the Coronavirus or SARS-COVID2 (COVID-19) has ravaged the planet. Over 70 Million have been infected and 1.7 million people have died worldwide. Up until this ‘Outbreak’, a global deadly pandemic was always something of fiction, regardless of numerous health experts for decades emphatically expressing its inevitability. In the United States, preparedness was greatly compromised by the Trump administrations restructuring of the CDC response team, and politicizing public health measures.  The double bill of Outbreak and Contagion gives you a sense of ‘what we thought a global pandemic would be like” under the most extreme positions possible. Now, for Nostalgia sake, look back at what these films got right, and what they were wildly wrong about. The interesting question I have: if a virus was isolated in a small town, do you think there would be conversations about wiping out the entire town with munitions?...        

 

7- Quarantine- Groundhog Day (1993)

To protect the populace and slow the spread of the Coronavirus in the United States, on March 13, 2020 massive stay at home orders were implemented. Outside of those classified as “essential workers” many of the industries had to switch to working remotely from home or shut down entirely. Our current level of technology has allowed our economy to limp on, without being completely annihilated. However, this has exacerbated social class divisions (more on that later).   Groundhog Day was chosen for this list not as a literal representation of quarantine, but to represent the repetitious feeling that accompanies being stuck in your home for 9 months (and counting), and to add some levity to a list that is considerably dower.  For some of us, the continued repetition of daily life in our homes was a welcomed respite from various social mores, especially if you were economically stable. While for others, quarantine has intensified mental health issues, especially depression leading to an increase in rates of suicide since the March lockdown began.

 

6- Police Militarization- Do Not Resist (2016)

 I broke my own rule of choosing only narrative films that represent 2020, to include Do Not Resist in this list representing police Militarization. While the current organization of police militarization has been going on since the civil rights movements of the 1950’s, the recent protests sparked after the deaths of George Floyd.[2] caused tensions between the over equipped/ under trained police to boil over again with civilians. The film Do Not Resist was made after the Michael Brown murder by police in Ferguson Missouri and touches on the several factors that allow  police militarization to continue namely: the surplus of weapons generated by the Military Industrial Complex, the MCLEA Act and the 1033 program.

 

5- Murder of Black People by Police – Do The Right Thing (1989)


Police Violence against black and brown people has been an epidemic since the formation of posses to capture runaway slaves.  There is an imbedded cultural and systemic racism of the criminal justice system (which includes policing, prosecution, and punishment) and the overall antiblackness of the United States. Mind you, this antiblackness refers to the blackness within black bodies, as the US culture has attempted and has been successful at the appropriation of black culture.  The same could be said for my selection here, Spike Lee’s Do The Right Thing. Not only does the police murder in the film seem prophetically like the death of George Floyd, but the film also gets appropriated by white critics as a stellar piece of cinema, without questioning or contemplation of what the film means; especially to the black experience.

 

4.  White Supremacy – Skin (2019)

White supremacy and racism have been the bedrock of the culture and structural organization of the United States since its inception.  With the election of Donald Trump, we have seen an increase in visibility and activity of hate groups, culminating in the protests Charlottesville. In 2020, during the presidential election, Donald Trump identified Antifa as a terrorist organization and would not denounce white supremacy during one of the debates. Instead, he told the hate group known as “The Proud Boys” to “stand back and stand by” which they interpreted as a call to action.  Skin, dives into the inner world of white supremacy that has been written about extensively by sociologists in the field Based on a true story, the film reinforces the idea that love can conquer hate, and is supported by data from the new-ish book Healing From Hate by Michael Kimmel.  

 

3- Threat of Nuclear War – WarGames (1983)

In Jun of 2020, North Korea vowed to increase its nuclear program, as peace talks failed. Around the same time North Korea blew up the joint liaison office they shared with South Korea. This, coupled with Russian hackers infiltrating US Nuclear Launch systems in December of 2020, increased the tension and threat level internationally, causing many people to believe we were on the brink of nuclear war. A similar sudden shift in Nuclear fear was dramatized in the 1983 film WarGames. A film about a computer hacker who gets into the Government network and accidently starts a nuclear war thinking it is a game. The dramatization was so close to reality that it lead to the creation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984. It is important to remember that pop culture is soft power.

 

2- Presidential Election * Double Feature* Wag the Dog (1997) and Election (1999)

  


The year’s presidential election has reinforced divided political lines scouring them deep into our collective psyche. The country’s conservative base has devolved into a bunch of increasingly vitriolic race bating xenophobic conspiracists, meanwhile centrist democrats, fearing the loss of their own wealth and power, pushed out/against more progressive ideas and candidates in their own party to nominate the most milquetoast candidate rather than a radical. And even with that centrist choice that was supposed to appeal to all people, the race was close. So close that we can not call the Biden win a repudiation of Trump or Trumpism. After these 4 years, especially this last one 74 million people still voted for Trump. This means that Biden only won because of A. Trump’s (mis)handing of the pandemic and B. The overwhelming support and activism of black and brown folk  The films in this double feature point to the relationships between politics, media violence and the insider “horse trading” that often goes on.  While these films directly parallel the 96’ election cycle, many of the tactics were repeated and perfected in 2020. 

 

1-           Ignorance  Idiocracy (2006)

2020 marks the 10 year culmination of the anti-intellectual movement in the United States. Over the last decade we saw increases in Anti Vaccers, anti- maskers, climate change deniers, and a multiplicity of conspiracy theorists. While there has always been a level of animosity for the academy, often viewed as isolated individuals in their “ivory tower”, there was an acceptance of basic public school science facts. Since 2010 we saw that acceptance and trust in facts and the scientific process be both questioned and rejected by tens of millions of Americans.  There is a fundamental flaw that is created if you can not agree on objective truth. The minute we start breaking apart the foundations of acceptable ideas of reality, our society breaks down.  Idiocracy  while does not pin point the anti- intellectual movement as the catalyst for the destabilization of society, it does present a future that is hauntingly similar to some of the events of 2020. This is particularly disturbing as we seem to have gotten there a lot quicker as Idiocracy is set in the year 2500.   

 

 

 


 

There seems to be irrational hope for the future that 2021 will be better than 2020. Sometimes, a fool’s hope is all we can hold on to. Yet, for Academic Cinephiles like me who worship film, I just want to back to church. Stay Safe everyone and have a acceptable holiday season, sheltering in place and remotely connecting with friends and family. 

 



[1] This hit the already strapped Independent films even harder. Many of them are getting by through the resurrection of the drive-in