Showing posts with label Environmentalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environmentalism. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2020

The Films of Hayao Miyazaki: Spirited Away



INTRODUCTION

                The eighth film in my retrospective on the films of Hayao Miyazaki is the ethereally sublime Spirited Away.  This film, like The Dark Knight  in Christopher Nolan’s filmography, is the film in Miyazaki’s body of work that has received the most analysis, critical praise, and award acclaim.  While the production of the film sees Miyazaki flirt with corporatization, the product of such a morally questionable bedfellow being both lucrative and anathematic, his thematic criticism of the economic system by which that partner sustains itself is such subtle shade, that it often goes unnoticed.  By using the trappings of the studio system for international distribution, Miyazaki is able to sew the seeds of doubt in the audience in order to question capitalism’s complete and utter viability.  




PLOT

 

10-year-old Chihiro, unhappy with her family moving, is reticent to check out an abandoned amusement park with her parents.  As a reluctant spectator she watches as her parents are taken over by a spell and transformed into pigs. Now trapped in the Spirit world with her name stolen, she must work off her debt in a bathhouse for wary gods. Yet, with the help of a young boy Haku, she hopes to free her parents from their transmogrification and thwart the witch that ensorcelled them both.

 


HISTORICAL CONTEXT

 

            Unlike his previous films which either blend together fantasy and the real world, or completely take place in a fictional world itself, Spirited Away does both. It bookends the fantasy world with reality. With this decision, Miyazaki is able to use the spiritual plain as a metaphor for growing up; a symbolic rite of passage that one must pass through. Pointing to the fact that even if there is no magic in “the real world”, the process of “growing up” does, at times, feel like sorcery.

 


Of Gods and Monsters II[1]

            Miyazaki’s second film to exclusively feature Shintoism and Kami (Spirits), Spirited Away anthropomorphizes and modernizes (to some extent) the spirit world. Thus, showing the spirit world as something that is tangible, while also having order, structure, and rules.  It is a place that values personhood, trades in identity, and abhors disruption. Yet, the overall plot of the film does not take place in the spirit world per-se, but in an oasis/ resort where the spirits vacation from the drudgery of their eternally monotonous and arduous existential existence. Which, given the state of some of these spirits, is far more grueling and traumatic than typically depicted in Western versions of the afterlife; that tend to focus on and value leisure and serenity above all else.

            Unlike Princess Mononoke, which features specific spirits (kami) that exist in the Shinto and Buddhist religions, Miyazaki is intentionally vague in his references, as he wanted to craft a story encompassing the essence of Japanese folklore, rather than provide an exclusive retelling of a specific story.  In this way, Miyazaki paints in broad strokes of Mystical divination. As Chihiro is entering the spirit world she passes through a torii, which is a gate that is often used in transition from one plain of existence to another.  Additionally, the bathhouse where Chihiro (Now called San after her name is stolen) works, embodies the Shintoist principle of spiritual purification. The spirits are rejuvenated once they leave the bathhouse.  Yet, specific spirits from Japanese folklore are not referenced or traditionally depicted. Instead, Miyazaki develops his own various creations. The most famous of these is “No-Face”, which in the film can be a surrogate for any number of different spirits, individuals or concepts, and has become the second most marketed character for Ghibli behind Totoro. 

            The other big mystical/magical aspect that separates this film from all of Miyazaki’s other work; is the way that it uses Kanji. Kanji is a Japanese form of language and writing that is based in pictographs. The “words or phrases” that are used often are a representation of a picture or a drawing that describes what the word means.  Thus, if you change the way that word/ name is written, you can give that word or name an entirely new meaning. This is what happens to Chihiro when the Witch Yubaba removes parts of her written name and binds her with a “new” name derived from the original. Through this action Miyazaki is representing the importance and power of language and identity.

While in a more western context, a person’s name is decidedly not their identity, and the meaning of their name is more so a quaint piece of trivia. In Eastern Spirituality; however, your name has characteristics that are designed to speak to your character, or in the case of infants, the character that you desire your children to have.  If one views the stealing, and changing of Chihiro’s name in this specific context, then what once was viewed as a simple contrivance to move the plot forward, becomes a horror show. Indeed, all the characters that are felled by this spell, often have their personalities change once they lose their identities. Because, with a new name their foundational pictograph has changed, and thus their overall characteristics. This is apparent in the film’s central conflict.

Before Chihiro gets bound by Ubaba’s magic, she is timid, unsure of herself and generally troubled.  When she is suddenly bound by the new name Sen, she begins to value community, hard work, and a sense of independence.[2] Because this film is clearly about the rites of passage individuals go through as they transition from childhood to adulthood, the change in her name could signify the traits she will exude as an adult. Thus, she seems to realize that with all of the freedoms and choices a person can have as an adult, that it comes at the cost of a lot of work and responsibility. Within this context, it is even more fascinating that when she is able to have her name restored, and be reunited with her parents, Miyazaki has her revert back to (some) of her old behaviors and quirks; with a deeper appreciation of the time she still has left as a kid. 

 


Production

            Miyazaki first got inspiration for this film when he would vacation at a summer lake house, with his friend and his family who had a preteen daughter. One day he came across some teen magazines she had lying around, and decided to flip through them, to see what “kids were into these days”. After which, he decided that girls of her age needed to be taught life lessons that he felt were absent in the reading material marketed to her. Therefore, he was determined to write a character and a story that girls of her age could look up to; tying the heroine to an interest he had in the spiritual nature of bathhouses.

            Back in 1996, during the production of Princess Mononoke, The Walt Disney Company secured the international distribution rights to all of Studio Ghibli films. Through this, they were hoping to corner the market on whimsical, family-friendly anime from Japan, and control the video distribution rights to most of their media.  Yet, when they found out that Mononoke was absent of whimsy, and antagonistic to families, they discarded it to Miramax who had no clue how to market the film.[3] Feeling blindsided by the tone of Mononoke, by the time production started on Spirited Away, Disney executives wanted assurances that the same thing wasn’t going to happen. Therefore, they decided to invest in 10% of the production cost for the right to first refusal for international distribution. This was an attempt to get more clout and control over the production process, rejecting a few other of Miyazaki’s ideas (based on books or other existing properties) until they accepted the idea of Chihiro and her journeys in the spirit world. 

            As production went long, and Miyazaki was having difficulty cutting the story down to a manageable length (the original story boards clocking the film in at 3 and ½ hrs)[4], Disney was questioning the value and direction of the project.  The film was only allowed to move forward after an impassioned defense by gross sexual assaulter John “Huggy Bear” Lasseter. Who, by Miyazaki’s own admission, was “a bulldozer”[5] in convincing the top executives at Disney to support the film. Lasseter promised that they would not see a repeat of the financial debacle of Princess Mononoke. He was correct.  For their small investment, the global success of Spirited Away allowed Disney to make money hand over fist.

             Spirited Away was the first Ghibli film to get the full Disney treatment as a part of the complete corporate machine. From the marketing to merchandise, Disney had their hands in every aspect of the presentation of this film. It was this complete synergy that allowed for the widest distribution for any Studio Ghibli film up to that date, flooding storefronts with t-shirts, plush toys, and assorted knickknacks, as well as aggressively pandering this melancholy analysis of achieving adulthood, to unsuspecting ignorant western white kids.

Begrudgingly, it also allowed for the film to be the Second Ghibli film in a row to be featured on the critical film festival circuit; which would eventually lead to Oscar gold.[6]  Many have cited the critical and commercial success of Spirited Away that changed the perspective of Japanese animated films in the rest of the world; paving the way for the future success of not only the subsequent Miyazaki and Ghibli films, but the more current soon-to-be classics like Mary and the Witch’s Flower, Weathering with You, and Your Name.

 

The Lost Decade

 

One of the most significant historical events that occurred during the production of Spirited Away, was the Japanese economic crisis from 1991-2001. The cause of this crisis was The Plaza Accord in 1985,[7] a joint agreement between several countries including the United States and Japan, to depreciate the US dollar in relation to the Japanese Yen. This caused an economic bubble in Japan that inflated stock and property prices, which eventually burst in August of 1990 when the Nikkei index dropped 50%[8]. The banks were eventually bailed out by the Japanese government, transforming several financial institutions into “Zombie banks”. These are any banks that have a 0% profit but continue to operate because their ability to pay off debt is shored up by financial regulatory agencies.   Yet, many industries, such as the automobile and electronic industries, were gutted; losing hundreds of thousands of jobs and replacing many of their salaried employees with temporary workers, without benefits[9]while the workers that still had a job saw their overall wages decrease by 13%.  Because this was all happening while Miyazaki was attempting to write, draw and structure Spirited Away, and simultaneously attempting to placate the Mickey Mouse monopoly monolith; he organized and infused the film with a strong, layered anti-capitalist critique.

              


SOCIAL CONTEXT

            In many of the lauded reviews of Spirited Away, many journalists and reviewers pointed to the blatant themes of the film, those of spirituality, environmentalism and as a coming of age story.  While this film is all of those things, it is more deeply a standing critique of the entire process of capitalism, and how it infects other aspects of our social world.

 

Capitalism: The Basics

·         Individuals own the means of production either through corporations or by the individuals themselves

·          Most goods and services are sold at “market” prices which are determined by competition. This competition is fueled by the profit motive.

·         Most people who work for pay, work for other people who own the means of production. Therefore, the majority of individuals are “Wage Laborers”

 

Capitalism is a wide-reaching economic system; and several nation states have developed a version of capitalism that suits their needs. It is a common way to organize economic structures, but that does not mean that it is the only economic system. As capitalism grows, it can transform into a political and social philosophy that encourages the development of, and barriers to public policy. This means that within certain capitalist systems (such as in the US) many of the social institutions, created to satisfy basic needs, are redesigned to fit within capitalism’s for-profit market economy. This results in many of these institutions, becoming privatized and reorganized to maximize profit. This is a process that intensifies through political deregulation on industry, which transmutes capitalism into what Emile Durkheim called “a social fact.”  Social facts, which are ways of thinking, values, cultural norms and attitudes that transcend any one person, that existed before anyone individual and will continue to exist for generations after. These social facts have a subconscious effect on an individual, who will not realize the influence being exerted by such social facts, unless they attempt to resist.  

Capitalism is an example of a social fact because we are socialized to the understanding of capitalism and our participation in it (Profit motive, working for wages etc.). People are often born into a capitalist system; thus, capitalism exerts a coercive power and control over them to participate in it as (the only) mechanism to achieve wealth and prosperity. We often do not support an individual that desires a modest income with no ambition to increase their social standing. To do so is seen as abnormal, immature, or reckless. These ideas become cross cultural, existing around the world at the same time regardless of values, norms, or customs. It creates a global capitalist economy that is near impossible to hide, ignore or circumvent.

 


Capitalism’s Critique (Basic)

Capitalism assumes that free markets create equal autonomy for workers. Under this assumption, free market workers, if they are feeling exploited, can quit and/or work for themselves. The reality is that most people work within capitalist organizations, businesses, and structures. Therefore, the work for a particular employer is voluntary, but a person cannot nix out of the entire system; they still must pay bills, and use financial capital to purchase life sustaining products (like food). They are trapped.

 

Additionally:

1.      Unregulated capitalism allows both organizations and individuals to generate mass inequalities of wealth, allowing real freedom to be limited for many people within this system of capitalism.

2.      A system built on the drive for capital (what is often referred to as the profit motive) incentivizes individuals and businesses to hide problems (especially involving consumer safety) to maintain high profits. This can lead to objectification of human beings, exploitation of labor, dehumanization and decision-making practices that are focused on short term gains, rather than long term solutions

3.      In operation, capitalism does not recognize the necessity of the public good.

4.      In a truly unregulated capitalist market, many of the social services that a government may normally provide becomes satisfied by an organization or company for a profit. Recent examples include: Healthcare industries, military and defense industries, schools and child care, and even prisons. 

5.      This privatization encourages behavior to deal with problems based upon turn over (quitting or getting another job), rather than on compromise. There is then a greater incentive for people to quit/ or be fired, rather than try and improve working conditions in the jobs and businesses that they have. This is what has led to the maintenance of various forms of discrimination and inequality in the workplace, because rather than change normalized discriminatory practices, many people who are a part of historically marginalized groups just decide to quit.

 

It is important to understand the basic functions and critiques of capitalism from a sociological perspective, before diving into the specific criticisms Miyazaki levees against it; deeper cuts of Sociological anti- capitalist theory involving Veblen, Bauman, and Marx.


 




Capitalism’s Critique (Miyazaki’s Characters)

 

Miyazaki opens Spirited Away with Chihiro and her parents walking through the ruins of a Japanese theme park[10]. As they continue to explore, Chihiro’s father remarks that before the crisis, there were a lot of these theme parks around. This is his reference to the economic depression that was going on during Japan’s “Lost Decade”. Here, Miyazaki set the stage for his anti- capitalist critique, using both the overall story, characters, and their narrative journeys to achieve this.

 




            Chihiro’s Parents

            Almost immediately after arriving in town, Chihiro’s parents are lured by their noses to what looks like a banquet. Regardless of the warning signs of the emptiness of the town, with no staff or chefs present, Chihiro’s parents sit down and almost compulsively begin to consume as much food as they can; encouraging their daughter to do the same.  After exploring the town and getting scared that they are the only ones there, Chihiro returns to her parents and is horrified to discover that they have turned into pigs. 

            A shallow anti-capitalist interpretation of this scene is that it is a representation of greed.  Chihiro’s parents embody the excessive gluttonous consumption of consumers (by being literally turned into pigs), a mindset that Miyazaki believes contributed to “The Lost Decade”, resulting in the ruin of the Japanese economy. While this is an apt comparison, this only scratches the surface.  If you look closer to how the family is dressed, and the products they have around them, they identify with what Marx calls Commodity fetishism. This is the idea that much of our identity gets wrapped up and represented by the products we purchase and use.  The parents, even before entering the town, engage in what Sociologist Thorstein Veblen (1994) calls conspicuous consumption.  Conspicuous consumption is the practices of purchasing products for the alure of status those products provide in the eyes of the public.  Thus, in a very Goffmanian way, individuals are trying to control how other people perceive them; by hoping that from the consumption of a product, one can glean the product’s status from it. 





            Chihiro’s parents are driving an Audi, moving to a new town, can hire movers, and begin to eat at a buffet without looking at prices, or seeing if the food is for anyone else but themselves.  This frivolous use of wealth, and sense of entitlement points to a sense of financial security (they will be able to purchase all of the food they eat) that is more than just comfortable; its excessive. Their ability to take vacations (leisure as Veblen puts it) is a clear act of conspicuous consumption continued as they walk through the “abandoned town” as tourists. In this way the transformation of her parents into pigs is about more than just greed. It is a representation of their status and self-worth.

Another example of this is commonly seen through the tourist renting of homes and apartments in particular neighborhoods.  Through this consumption, individuals attempt to have “authentic” experiences; ones that can raise their status. Typically, this gets quite problematic if it is used to create/achieve performative wokeness. Performative wokeness is the conspicuous consumptive practice of using social justice rhetoric, principles, or behaviors as only a means of self-promotion. Usually, this is the actions of drawing attention to oneself through the mechanism of social justice to enrich oneself.  Examples include sports teams taking knees during the national anthem or wearing BLM gear, without socially contributing in more substantive ways such as through marching, donations, and education. Andi Zeisler (2016) explains a specific type of performative wokeness she calls “Marketplace Feminism”, which is the commodification and fetishizing of feminism through backpacks, stickers, t-shirts, water bottles etc. without a more substantive component not rooted in status achievement. 

According to Zygmunt Bauman (2007), this type of consumption will ironically lead to a lack of identity. We will continue to consume without the process really having any value. Life becomes a shopping spree, where all aspects of life can be consumed and interacted with, on a fundamentally basic level (Commodification).  However, satisfaction is the enemy, because it leads to the solidification of an identity, which is not conducive to Capitalism nor product production. Instead, a consumer, in a consumer economy, solidifies their identity only momentarily through the collection of experiences and desires. This process becomes addictive: as represented by Chihiro’s parents’ inability to stop eating, and their subsequent transformation into pigs.

 


Sen 

To stay in the spirit world and have a chance at saving her parents, Chihiro must find work. She goes to the Sorcerer Yubaba and demands a job, for which she cannot be denied as the bureaucratic system of the spirit world demands. She begins to work and take up residence in a bathhouse that serves various gods.  While one interpretation of this is in line with understanding the mechanism of secondary socialization, and how it prepares individuals for adulthood; teaching us the basics of the value of work, in the process of becoming a law abiding productive member of society. This perspective misses the overall exploitative nature of labor that is inherit in that practice. The inequality is often masked under the guise of process, organization, structure and precedence.  A closer look reveals, Miyazaki is presenting a critique of capitalism’s natural labor exploitation.

According to Marx (1978), once the process of industrialization lost sight of a product’s use value (instead focusing on exchange value), the system of capitalism stopped valuing the worker and their working experience. When that happens, it inevitably leads to exploitation through such behaviors as long hours, low pay/slave wages, poor working conditions, violence and increased automation (replacing workers).  We see this in every industry that capitalism touches, they either privatize or exploit labor. Corporations even use migrant labor (workers not living in the country that the work is being done) to lower costs. Factory work and farm work are the largest exploited industries in the US, and rely on underpaid workers so much, that if all of the migrant labor were to be banned, these industries would collapse.  Additionally, there is deliberate distance that is placed between the worker and consumer, so that prices of the product remain high but the wages to the workers remain low; allowing the company to exploit both the worker and the consumer simultaneously.   

Like many migrant workers living in the US, Chihiro in the Spirit world needs to find work.  Yet, she does not have the background or identity as a spirit in order to do that. Going to Yubaba for a job positions Chihiro as an undocumented migrant laborer. She is then ensnared by Yubaba’s spell which takes away her identity, transforming her into Sen.  This can be analogous to the way migrant workers are trapped without papers to only engage in physical labor, regardless of their education, skills or experiences. Their legal papers are the Miyazaki equivalent of Chihiro’s true name. If they do not have it, then they cannot get out.  Once her name is stolen, and Chihiro becomes Sen, she begins to experience the exploited labor of the bathhouse, in a lot of the same levels of exploitation that Marx describes: Long hours, grueling work of washing spirits, and cleaning tubs.  The fact that she is also a child does not seem to faze anyone; as it doesn’t several US companies.  

 


No-Face

 

In The Grundresse, Marx discusses that Capitalism (driven by the Profit motive) cannot abide a limit. It instead creates a barrier that it must either circumvent or ascend. Thus, the success of capitalism is based upon innovation. While this is not necessarily a problem theoretically, in practice this creates behaviors that only see an expansion of the system, resulting in exponential capital growth.  This leads to capitalism taking on certain conditions that make it near impossible for the process to stop, such as Commodification. Commodification is the process by which everything in human life, including human life, is bought, sold, traded, or exchanged. From the very real social problems of human trafficking, to abstract ideas like the commodification of emotions, such as love and fear (through diamonds, chocolates, flowers or security systems, weapons, and locks, respectfully). The dangers of unregulated capitalism by this adherence to the profit motive, is represented in Spirited Away through the character of No-Face.  

The spirit known only as “No-Face”, is first seen on the bridge at the beginning of the film.  At first, the spirit seems harmless, fluid, and ethereal, passively existing without malice. It seems to only want adulation and attention from other spirits, while they in turn seem to treat him with a mild neglect. Unfortunately, he is let into the bathhouse by Sen (thereby removing the barrier), and, once inside, unregulated, it begins to display some of the dangerous practices of capitalism. He first consumes a frog, that Miyazaki has identified as a symbol of greed. The implication here being that when capitalism is unrestricted; it can catch greed. Once this profit motive gets greedy, there is no stopping it.  It begins to consume everything; product and person alike, without remorse or respect, leaving infinite amounts of gold in its wake. Eventually, the No Face spirit becomes a large gelatinous monster that continues to consume with complete disregard for anything else.  It is only stopped by Sen, who rejects capitalism (by rejecting the gold “No Face” wants to give her) and can use the results of her hard work and compassion to quell the beast.



Environmentalism   

There is an irreparable rift between Capitalism and the Natural Laws of Life itself.”- Marx

 

Since we as a culture have gained the ability to measure atmospheric CO2 in the 1980’s, the preservation, protection and prosperity of the environment has been of growing importance.  Initially under the moniker “Global warming”, as our understanding of the human impact on the environment was better understood, the term has since evolved to “Climate Change”. Besides this progression to a greater social understanding of the environment, and in the face of mountains of scientific evidence, the United States is still one of the few Industrialized Nations that still has a debate over the validity of human impacted climate change. One of the main reasons for this is our abusive love affair with capitalism.

                The periods of industrial revolution that saw the rise of capitalism (based in factory production) established the foundation of our understanding of capital, without the scientific ability to understand our overall impact/effect on the environment.  Before we gained this ability, we were using a more religious explanation/rationalization for our actions. Akin to the ancient belief system of Naturalism, many people believed that the earth was too vast, and humans were so insignificant, that it would not be possible for humans to affect the environment.  By the time we gained the ability to measure (a fraction) of our overall impact on the environment, a scant 200 years later; not only has a lot of damage already been done, but  forms of Cultural capital, set by the industrial revolution, are continually passed on from one generation to another; thereby maintaining this disastrous effect on our environment as a cultural norm, which results in the collective Human Capital of a population creating a systematic maintenance (and increase) of environmental destruction. In short: Industrialization and Free Market Capitalism has created value in cultural ideas, skills, and behaviors, that result in environmental destruction.

Maslin (2014) puts it brilliantly:

So fundamentally, Climate change challenges the very economic theories that have dominated global economics for the last 35 years. Hence is it any wonder that many people prefer climate change denial to having to face the prospect of building a new [economic and] political system that will allow collective action and more equal distribution of wealth, resources and opportunities. Pp171-172

 


        Haku

The character in Miyazaki’s Spirited Away that represents this intersection of capitalism and environmentalism is Haku, the shapeshifting river spirit.  At the beginning of the film, it is casually mentioned by Chihiro’s father that in order to build the amusement park, they had to pave over a river. This is before the audience realizes that this is Haku, and that action is what caused his spirit to be diminished enough to be captured and exploited by Yubaba.  Like many other CEOs that exploit public resources for profit ,  Yubaba steals Haku’s full name and then uses him as a resource for her own purposes (Stealing a cursed object from Zaniba). Chihiro giving Haku herbal medicine, and by giving him back his true name, breaks the dam on his spirit and he is set free.  Here, Miyazaki is promoting eliminating the practice of diversion and/or obstruction of natural resources.  While this environmental message seems to have caught on in other parts of the world, because the United States can’t quit capitalism; we have deluded ourselves into thinking we can be environmentalists and capitalists congruently.   

 

            Green Capitalism

According to Scales (2017),  Green Capitalism is a form of environmentalism that emphasizes the economic value of ecosystems and biological diversity, and attempts to reduce human environmental impacts by ensuring that the importance of environmental services is reflected in the way that markets operate.   This perspective sees that competition can lead to a more environmental and equitable future as long as we change our business mindset to be more ecofriendly.  There are several examples of this Ecological Modernization: Tax incentives to reduce the ecological impact ex: Rebate Systems (ex: Cash for Clunkers) Fear (carmageddon 405 construction in LA area), and renewal programs (paper companies planting trees to replace the ones they knock down).

            One could look at Spirited Away’s Bathhouse and the “stink spirit” sequence as an example of green capitalism. By allowing the “stink spirit” into the bathhouse, and agreeing to cleanse it, Yubaba engages in green capitalism. As the sequence continues, it is revealed that the “stink spirit” is actually a polluted river. Miyazaki makes sure to show through Sen’s efforts, just how labor intensive it is to completely clean up a river. Once the River spirit is revealed to be such, Sen is gifted with an ecological resource that aids her throughout the entire film.  The shallow metaphor being that there is “profit” and value in working with nature, rather than disregarding it, or trying to control it.   

            Unfortunately, this process of Green Capitalism can lend itself to “Greenwashing”, in which the company only changes its public perception to seem more eco-friendly, without making ideological or substantive changes. This is done through repackaging or relabeling of products, or emphasizing ecofriendly practices that a company already engages in. Additionally, through this pro-capitalist solution, the underline assumption/problem is that it does not challenge the fundamental anti environmentalism ideology that has been embedded in our Industrialized Capitalism. Therefore, we can not be as environmentally conscious as we could be; perhaps even not enough to save humanity.  Because at this point, it does look like we must be willing to sacrifice something for the planet, whether that be eating meat, fewer kids, or the phasing out of automobiles.

 


CONCLUSION

Spirited Away is a masterpiece.  It is also a referendum on how we have ignored the problematic intersections of capitalism and the environment. Yet, Miyazaki, through the journey of Chihiro, points to hope in the teaching of the next generation to be the leaders for this change. From recent data, Miyazaki seems to be right.  A majority of young people fundamentally reject the tenets of Capitalism and at the same time  support an environmental agenda.  We, the adults of today, need to foster these ideals and make sure when these children become of age, they don’t inherit a hellscape of epic proportions.  

 

 

REFERERNCES

 

Bauman, Zygmunt 2007. Consuming Life.  Cambridge: Polity Press.

Marx, Karl 1978. “Crisis Theory” in The Marx-Engles Reader 2nd edition edited by Robert C. Tucker. London: W.W. Norton and Company Pp 443-465  

Marx, Karl 1993 The Grundrisse London: Penguin Books.

Maslin, Mark 2014. Climate Change: A Very Short Introduction 3rd edition Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scales, John 2017. “Green Capitalism” in The International Encyclopedia of Geography. Edited by Douglas Richardson, Noel Castree, Michael F. Goodchild, Audrey Kobayashi, Weidong Liu, and Richard A. Marston. Pp 1-8

 

Veblen, Thorsten 1994. The Theory of the Leisure Class. London: Penguin Books.

Zeisler, Andi 2016. We Were Feminist Once: From Riot Grrl to CoverGirl the Buying and Selling of a Political Movement. New York: PublicAffairs.

 

 



[2] Sociologically speaking, the change is name can be viewed as the part of the degradation ceremony at the beginning of the resocialization process the majority of people go through as they transition from a Primary (childhood) socialization to Secondary (Adult) Socialization.

[3] Spirited Away by Miyazaki". FPS Magazine. Archived from the original on 19 May 2014. Retrieved 24/10/2020

[4] To achieve a suitable running time Miyazaki reportedly cut out all of the sequences that he considered “Eye Candy”.  With the theatrical film already being a feast for the eyes, one’s mind reels at the possibility of a film even more spectacular in scope.

[5] Because as a sexual assaulter, he doesn’t know the meaning of the words “No.” or “Stop”

[6] Which Miyazaki was not present to accept

[8] Kunio Okina, Masaaki Shirakawa, and Shigenori Shiratsuka (February 2001): The Asset Price Bubble and Monetary Policy: Japan's Experience in the Late 1980s and the Lessons

[9] Even after the economy stabilized, the Japanese workforce is still 1/3 temporary unprotected disposable labor

[10] The Imagery here is a lot like Lapita from Castle in the Sky when the city was reclaimed by nature. 


Thursday, October 1, 2020

The Films of Hayao Miyazaki: Princess Mononoke

 



INTRODUCTION

The seventh film in my comprehensive retrospective on The Films of Hayao Miyazaki is the mystical chambara fantasy Princess Mononoke. Cited as one of the greatest animated films of all time, this was the first film to bring Miyazaki wide international acclaim, as it was Mononoke that brought Miyazaki to the attention of US audiences.  One of the few animated films of its era to travel the film festival circuit, Mononoke gained steam in the hubs of New York, Toronto, and LA. before bursting onto US screens in 1999.  And while this film would become the highest grossing animated film of all time, this was just the “set” for the “spike” Miyazaki would deliver three years later with Spirited Away.

 


PLOT

Set during the feudal Muromachi period in Japan, Ashitaka, a young prince of the Emishi clan (Known in the story for riding red elk), encounters a Boar god that has been twisted into a demon by hate for the humans who attacked it.  Although Ashitaka is able to slay the beast, his right arm is cursed by one of the demon’s worm-tentacles.  Armed with the knowledge that the demon mark will spread and eventually kill him, Ashitaka uses the time he has left to investigate the incident.  This investigation causes him to get in between an ancient battle between the Gods of the Forrest and human prosperity, while trying to see the conflict “unclouded by hate.”

 


HISTORICAL CONTEXT

            The only one of his films to be set in Feudal Japan, this is Miyazaki’s one dalliance with the Samurai film culture. Typical Samurai films are set in the Tokugawa era of Japan 1500-1868, usually closer to the Meiji restoration that saw the Samurai as a class in revolt with the public consciousness. A lot of Samurai films set in this era center around the toppling of the Shogunate, causing many Samurai to be released from the service of their feudal lord, creating Ronin “masterless” (and penniless) Samurai. Many of the Samurai classics from famed directors like Akira Kurosawa, Kihachi Okamoto and Masaki Kobayashi are told in this period.  Miyazaki on the other hand, decides to set Mononoke a few dynasties earlier, in the Muromachi era (1336- 1573). This not only informs the overall look of the characters, but informs the spiritual dimensions of the film as well

Of Gods and Monsters[1]

The Muromachi culture during this period was heavily influenced by both Zen Buddhism and Shintoism.  Zen Buddhism is a spiritual practice that focuses on meditation, self-restraint, insight into the mind, and into the activities of all things. There is no separation between practice and enlightenment in Zen. Thus, you do not need to do anything specific in order to achieve spirituality, as any act is enough. Although, typical Zen practitioners sit in Zazen (cross legged position) with a keen focus on breathing as their chief form of meditation.  The other concepts of Zen that are important are the ideas of “No Mindedness” and “The Middle Way”

“No-Mindedness” is a state of awareness that is only occupied with the present moment. There is no thought of the past, or the future, nor of any subject, topic or ideology. The practitioner attempts to just simply “be.”  Whereas “The Middle Way” is common in all types of Buddhism, which indicates a maintenance of focus that is a path between extremes.  This is often interpreted as a rational and practical “grey” area between bifurcated concepts that are often presented or develop into exaggerations of isolated ideologies.

            Shintoism is a religious practice developed in Japan that is defined as belief in the kami (spirits). This is a form of polytheism that sees “spirits and gods” in everything from plants, air, water, the moon, to the cosmos.  Like most religions, the stories of the gods and spirits act as morality/cautionary tales for social control, or as ways to explain yet unexplainable phenomena. What separates Shintoism from other polytheistic beliefs is that within Shintoism the spirits and gods are not necessarily omnipotent, omniscient, or immortal. Thus, the stories that involve them are often reflecting a more fluid sense of morality than is typically found in a Eurocentric polytheism. Modern Shintoism has been interpreted to center on nature and promote environmentalism.

            In Princess Mononoke, all of the gods and spirits are influenced by Shintoism.  The gods are a part of a polytheistic pantheon without a typically western hierarchy structure.  The three Animal God factions that Miyazaki presents are the Apes, Wolves, and Boars. Additionally, Miyazaki includes “The Forrest Spirit” presented as a sika deer, and the tree spirits called kodama. Even the name Mononoke translates to mean “vengeful spirit”.  Each of these spirits represent something depicted in Shintoism itself.

            The Wolf God and her Children are derived from Shinto’s idea of the Okami, the wolf spirit. Typically, they are divine messengers or vehicles of the mountain gods. They also provide guidance to worthy humans. The monkeys of Japanese folklore often are passive and act as a mediator between spirits and humans, while at the same time, being tricksters. While Miyazaki’s “Nightwalker” is related to the Daidabachi which is a large spirit that creates lakes wherever it steps, the Forrest Spirit it transforms into is a Shi-shigami, deer spirit. Deer spirits in Shintoism are vehicles and messengers of all gods, not just those on the mountain. Which is why deer in Japan can roam the countryside[2]. The Boar in Shintoism is revered for its defiance, bravery determination and impetuousness. All of these qualities are displayed through the Boar clan’s actions in the film, as they are felled by the weapons of Iron Town.

As in Shintoism, many of these gods and spirits in Miyazaki’s story can be corrupted or destroyed. This is depicted in the annihilation of the boar clan and the Forrest Spirit itself

The boar clan’s assault on the human stronghold witnesses the destruction of the spirit clan through modern explosives and weapons (guns). No doubt a metaphor for the way advanced technology can become so powerful that it becomes greater than the gods themselves. Additionally, Shintoism is again invoked in the way the Boar clan leaders Nago and Okkoto become corrupted by led poisoning and their own hate, transforming them into demons. To Shintoism, Nago and Okkoto become a Totati. Totati is a demon in Shintoism that is created by a vengeful spirit that hangs on to anger.  

              


  

              

Production

Miyazaki began to cultivate a lot of the ideas and character Sketches for Princess Mononoke while working for an animator in LA on a project he eventually left.  The main production did not start in earnest until 1994. This is when he had his chief animators and himself come up with the initial story boards and character sketches.  In this process Miyazaki personally approved all 144,000 single shots of this film and even redrew 88,000 cells himself during the production.  It was this pace and work ethic, that began Miyazaki’s flirtation with retirement. Henceforth, he would announce at the end of every subsequent project, that he was going to retire; but then eventually come back.

Like a lot of other Japanese directors that have produced chambira films, Miyazaki too was influenced by the John Ford western for Mononoke.  He wanted “Iron Town” to have more of a frontier feel to it, rather than accurately depicting medieval Japan. Without these western elements, Miyazaki was fearful that the film was too deeply rooted in the long history, culture, and mythology of Japan, which he was certain would not appeal to a wider audience.  He was not confident people would get it.

In the 1990’s, The Disney Company owned the distribution rights to all of Studio Ghibli films.[3] At the time, Disney charged Miramax and its co-founder, convicted sexual predator Harvey Weinstein,[4] with Mononoke’s distribution in the United States. In preparing the film for distribution, Weinstein oversaw the production of the English dub (translated by Neil Gaiman), and how the film was going to be presented in theaters.  With the film’s run time being a whopping 134 min, much longer than your average animated American film (especially since a lot of American animation is created for children), Weinstein, in an act of aggressive bullying, attempted to get Miyazaki to cut 45 minutes out for the US release, after previously agreeing not to.  Finding such an idea so apocryphal and dishonest, Ghibli’s Producer Toshiro Suzuki, at the behest of Miyazaki, sent Weinstein a katana with the note that read “No Cuts!”.  The film was eventually released at the length Miyazaki specified.[5]

 


SOCIAL ANALYSIS  

            Many of the themes of Princess Mononoke have become the staple of what the world expects from Miyazaki. It is after this, in the time before his next film, Spirited Away, where lot of people went back to his previous work and retroactively applied the themes of Mononoke (Environmentalism, Industrialization Capitalism and Gender) to create thematic consistency. While some of these themes are present in all of his previous work, it is Nausicaä with which Mononoke thematically rhymes; taking on some of the same concepts, but asking different social questions about The environment, Capitalism and gender dynamics.

 


Environmentalism[6]

 

Even a shallow interpretation of Miyazaki’s work, especially Mononoke, understand that it has a lot to say about the environment and human’s relationship to it. However, when we look at this through the Sociological Perspective, particularly in comparison to his other work, Miyazaki is asking different questions about that relationship with each film, and with Mononoke, making a finer point than he has in the past.

On the surface, one could make the simplistic argument that each of the characters are embodiments of the thematic conflicts Miyazaki is interested in: Eboshi (Industrialization/Capitalism) San (Environmental Conservation) and Ashitaka (socially conscious consumer) all represent some aspect or actors in environmental conflicts. Therefore, the interactions between these characters are the conflation of ideas Miyazaki wants to say something about. Yet, this film goes beyond just its anthropomorphic transformation of characters. It also paints an inevitable bleakness that the mere existence of humanity means the destruction and consumption of the environment; and while we may stave off this process for a period of time, halting its momentum, elemental eradication is inevitable.

This inevitability was set in motion as our society transformed from a premodern Society (from which Ashitaka hails from) into Modernity[7] (Iron Town). As societies shifted from an agrarian to urban organization, resources were mined from the earth through industrial means with greater ease than ever before.  This process, and its results, were then given value beyond what was needed to sustain a labor force (basic exchange value capitalism), which fueled the desire of overproduction for profit rather than necessity (greed). Historically, because there was an inability to measure the overall global impact of these practices at that time, a False Consciousness developed in humans regarding the environment. Humans of the time generally did not understand the lasting effects they were causing. This ignorance continued for so long, that by the time humans gained the ability to measure their effect, not only had irreputable damage occurred, but generations of cultural norms and values were centered around this consumptive mentality which has the capacity to bring society to ruin, if unchanged. This mentality developed into climate change denial and transformed the environment into a political issue.

  Contrarily, Lady Eboshi in the film, does not present this form of blind ignorance. She is very much aware of her impact on the environment and relishes in its eradication.  This is the perspective common in the” Reganite” late stage Capitalism, that seeks to control the overall environment in a structured and organized way. What makes Mononoke revelatory sociological storytelling, is that Miyazaki puts this post war (Vietnam) mindset in a person living in during Capitalism’s infancy. By that subtle shift, Miyazaki is foreshadowing the end of the story. Regardless, of what transpires between Ashitaka and San after the film ends, Lady Eboshi will rebuild and expand Iron Town, eventually ushering in the concrete jungle of modern Japan. Lady Eboshi is not just Capitalism, but a type of destructive corrosive and consumptive Capitalism which is emblematic more of our current culture.

 


                        Eboshi as a Disaster Capitalist

Coined by Journalist Naomi Klein (2007) Disaster Capitalism is defined as the practices of generating profit through the creation or exploitation of disasters. While the term "disasters" was originally taken literally to mean natural disasters (fire, hurricane, flood etc.) and the profitability of reconstruction. The term has also been applied to social, economic, political or Health Disasters. The key is to use the “shock” of the disaster to adopt or enforce social or political policies that would enrich elites. These are usually policies that the public would not agree to under “normal” circumstances. Instead, they prey on the public’s disorientation (due to the “shock”) to gain their acquiescence, and then only provide Pro-market capitalist solutions. We’ve seen this with 9/11 and the passing of the Patriot act which allowed for the monetization of meta data[8], the gentrification after Hurricane Katrina, and now with the Coronavirus: the manufacturing of masks and other forms of PPE (personal protective equipment), the pharmaceutical profits from the eventual vaccine, Stimulus packages, and the propping up of industries through government bailouts.

     Lady Eboshi demonstrates this perspective in the way that she exploits the Disaster she helped create by warring with the Boar clan. From the direct outcome of the battle, she gets her people to go into the forest, and kill the Forest Spirit for its healing powers.  This singularity of thought and purpose toward Disaster Capitalism, is demonstrated when she does not send help back to Iron Town when it is being attacked by a rival clan. She is willing to sacrifice the lives of the women and disabled protecting Iron Town, because there is money in its reconstruction. She can also sell the viscus extract from the Forest Spirit’s decapitated head as a miracle cure. 

  In other reviews, Eboshi is often individualized and not viewed through this anti capitalistic lens. For instance, several reviews cite Eboshi’s garden as a representation of her complexity and lack of hostility toward the environment, as if to say “See she likes plants! She can’t be all bad.” That is like saying people who had house slaves weren’t racist. A person can admire a resource and still objectify and abuse it. Eboshi’s plants are only admirable to her because she has power over them, in what plants are in her garden, and being able to control how they grow. It is order that she craves, and she is willing to obliterate the world to achieve it. Lady Eboshi can, through this socio-economic lens, be seen as the primary villain of this story. 

 


San and Climate Activism 

Climate activism has always been an antithesis to industrialized Capitalism. Our current form of resistance began in the 1970’s with the celebration of the first Earth Day, the fight for improving air quality and exacting policies to achieve it[9].  Modern Environmentalism focuses on three areas: environmental conservation, reduction of pollutants, and increase in biodiversity. In that charge, activists have come to the basic conclusion that our current industrial practices are unsustainable for our environment.  This is because, as I have mentioned, Capitalism reinforces behaviors and practices that promote environmental destruction. Therefore, to have any meaningful environmental change, we need to deconstruct the entire system.

In Mononoke, it is this deconstructive desire that fuels San and The Wolf Clan’s war with Iron Town.  San, being raised outside of the organizational structures of civilization, has grown to understand the pain inflicted on the forest by industrialization. This understanding brews into hate for humanity and causes her to reject everything that makes her human.  This culminates in her verbally denying her humanity to Ashitaka and falling into bursts of animalistic ferocity, engaging a threat with quick, agile, and instinctive maneuvers. Because of her emotional commitment to the environment, beyond what is considered acceptable by the pro-industrial capitalist perspective, San would be labeled, in our current parlance, as an ecoterrorist.

Ecoterrorism is the use or threat of violence to further promote or insure environmental policies. This usually happens when activists destroy property (whether that be equipment, infrastructure, or personnel) in an attempt to thwart, or completely eliminate the threat of industrial capitalism on the environment. By that definition, San’s assassination attempt of Lady Eboshi can be seen as ecoterrorism due to San’s belief that if she is successful, not only will she get vengeance for Eboshi’s strip mining and deforestation, but she will stop the entire climate crisis. While this is short sited and does not see the macro level impacts of humanity as a whole, San’s plan (and a lot of Eco-Terrorism) fails because they do not have a diplomatic or legislative component. San needs an advocate, and her own Green New Deal.

 


Ashitaka as a climate diplomat 

Ashitaka represents the collateral damage that is caused in any war. His curse, the potential destruction of his village and people, would have been caused by the aftereffects of this “War for the Environment,” had he not stepped in. Ashitaka is the grey area in between two extremes. This allows him to see with eyes “unclouded by hate”, when embroiled in this Ecological crisis.  To that end, he begins to act as a “neutral” third party to resolve the conflict; interacting with both Eboshi and San, in order to stem the tide of utter destruction. Like many other real climate conscious advocates ,  Ashitaka is injured in the process and while he can make small incremental change, he ultimately fails in his desire to achieve a more macro level impact. He cannot stop the decapitation of the Forest Spirit, and while he does manage to return its severed head to the body, he cannot stop the spirit’s death. 

Identifying Ashitaka as a true neutral party, Miyazaki blurs the negative connotations of the Forest spirit’s death by juxtaposing it with the solution to Ashitaka’s curse and curing Iron Town of leprosy. At films end, Miyazaki solidifies Ashitaka’ s diplomatic status when Ashitaka becomes a citizen of Iron Town to help with its reconstruction. The implication being that he will help guide Eboshi and Iron Town into becoming more ecologically friendly. Yet, in interviews about the seemingly ambiguous nature of the film, Miyazaki is clear that the ending points to the cycle of hate and destruction beginning again with Eboshi’s line “We will remake the city, better this time.” Miyazaki believes, regardless of intention, if industrialization continues, the environment is not safe. 

 


Gender in the World of Mononoke

 The work of Hayao Miyazaki has been consistently used as an alternative to the corporatized mass-produced princess culture spear-headed by Disney. More specifically, a handful of Miyazaki films feature specific “princesses” that provide a far more egalitarian and feminist message. In this film, San, Princess Mononoke herself, joins both Sheeta  and Nausicaa as Studio Ghibli royalty as a Ghibli Princess.[10] A Ghibli Princess is self-assured, bold, principled, has a unwavering morality and drive to do something that she knows to be unequivocally correct, while also not shying away from danger or difficulty. She is never “damseled” or becomes a prize for someone else’s work/bravery, and she never defines her identity or existence by her relationship status.  The irony of this kind of “feminist” messaging is that, defining and labeling the characters as “feminist,”[11] was never Miyazaki’s intention. He only set out to see boys and girls as equal, in both their abilities and the lessons they need to learn throughout childhood. He believes that these are universal themes that all humans, regardless of their placement on the gendered spectrum, should understand.

 Princess Mononoke is one of the first times in Miyazaki’s career that he gives us differing, but equally complex, representations of femininity when comparing the main characters of Lady Eboshi and San. San and Eboshi can be interpreted as different types of feminism. From such a lens, their juxtaposition and conflict in the film becomes a representation of their clashing ideologies. Yet, these similarities do not occur to either of the characters. San does not see the feminism in Lady Eboshi’s actions with her people, because San is not a part of Iron Town’s social structure. Similarly, Eboshi sees San as just one more obstacle in her quest for domination. 

  

 


 

Eboshi’s Liberal Feminism

 

Lady Eboshi is representative of the common liberal (usually white) forms of feminism that seek justice for women from inside an already established system. This is commonly illustrated through the example of Second Wave Feminism, particularly the creation of the National Organization for Women by Betty Friedan. This type of feminism, through several of its founders, was imbued with a white perspective which limited their perception and reduced their ability to consolidate power among all women during the Second wave movement. Liberal feminism (viewing feminism through a white cultural lens) championed actions and legislation that would support and improve the lives of white women, such as the ability to enter the workforce.  Ignoring the fact that women of color have always had to work, and the many other differences that separated women’s experiences.

 This alienation lead to the branching of nonwhite, trans, gat and disabled women into different, more radical forms of feminism. Radical Feminism being the type of feminism which seeks a dismantling of the entire social system.  Rather than see the constraints on women as being able to be changed, as liberal feminists support, radical feminism sees the oppression of women rooted in the socio-political system; itself fueled by valuing white, cis heterosexual able-bodied men. Thus, creating and maintaining laws that greatly improve that group’s ability to succeed. One of the chief differences between liberal and radical feminism is the support of Capitalism. A liberal feminist can also be pro-capitalist, whereas a radical feminist cannot. It is this difference that is mirrored by Lady Eboshi and San in the film.

Eboshi is a liberal feminist in the way that she interacts with her townspeople.  After eradicating prostitution, she redistributes the workers from the brothels; putting them to work in the furnaces of Iron Town. She also gives these women the freedom to choose their partners. Secondly, she also does not see those suffering from leprosy as being social pariahs, common for that time. She welcomes them into Iron town and treats them humanely. Both actions are a redistribution and/or accessing of a labor force while still maintaining the capitalism structure.

It is also important to mention that these (monetarily profitable) decisions are framed as “kindnesses” Lady Eboshi bestows upon her people; thereby fostering in them a fierce sense of loyalty and justice.  During the assassination attempt by San on Eboshi, the townspeople rally behind their leader; fiercely defending her by surrounding San with their swords and guns. Here, not only does Eboshi fight San one on one (improving her status and credibility), but she allows two women, whose husbands died in the wolf attack on the mountain road, to get “revenge” for their loved ones, by shooting at San. Whom, on the other hand, in her opposition to Lady Eboshi’s liberal Feminism, not only adopts a more radical feminist perspective, but a particular form of radicalization known as EcoFeminism.

 


San, the Ecofeminist

 

EcoFeminism, a term coined by French writer Françoise d'Eaubonne is a specific form of radical feminism that focuses on the relationship between gender and nature. Some Ecofeminists use ecological destruction as a complex metaphor for how women are treated within society, seeing the treatment of the earth and the treatment of women as being analogous.

 The character of San intersects with Ecofeminism at two distinct points:

1.      The Ecofeminist principle regarding capitalism and the environment.

2.      The subcategory of Spiritual Ecofeminism

 For Ecofeminists, capitalism has a need and drive toward the exploitation and destruction of animals, earth, and people for profit (Adams and Gruen 2014).  San, being raised[12] by the Wolf God Moro, came of age with an understanding of the beauty, wonder, and splendor of the environment and its importance to all creatures. Therefore, San sees the actions of Iron Town, and Lady Eboshi specifically, in the destruction of the forest for profit, as not only selfish but dangerous.

            Spiritual ecofeminism, a subcategory of Ecofeminism itself, see the earth as alive and devotees give time and energy to its protection; focusing on community-based behaviors that generate caring and compassion.  In Mononoke, we literally see the earth alive through the Tree Spirits and the Forrest God/ Spirit, the latter of whom controls life and death. San’s respect and reverence for these beings is so great, that she is willing to go to war with those that oppose or try to harm them.  Admittedly, this is not a common practice among spiritual eco feminists, as they tend to preach nonviolence.


 


CONCLUSION

Princess Mononoke was both a critical and commercial success. The film became the biggest film in Japan at the time and one of the most profitable animated films in the world, grossing over 230 Million dollars. This was a watershed moment for Miyazaki as it was a story that he was working on for years, and it was the film that allowed him to be able to make whatever he wanted next.[13] Princess Mononoke, Nausicaa and Spirited Away are the films in Miyazaki’s filmography that represent what the public sees as “The Miyazaki Aesthetic.” It was these ethereal masterpieces of Spiritual Eco-Feminist Anti-Capitalism that solidified him as a welcomed alternative to the sexist corporatized monotony of Disney and others of their ilk. 

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Aadams, Carol J. and Lori Gruen  2014. “Groundwork” Pp 7-36 In EcoFeminism: Feminist Intersections with other Animals and the Earth New York Bloomsbury Academic

 

Klein, Naomi, 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism New York: Picador    

 

 



[2] Through the adherence to these rituals, beliefs, and behaviors. The deer have become, in the strict Durkheimian sense, a sacred object.

[3] Thankfully this has changed. Since 2017 Gkids has had exclusive distribution rights for all of Studio Ghibli and has remastered and re released all of their films.

[4] Seriously, Fuck this guy. If I believed in Hell he, and all the other male predators he trained in the industry would be flayed and burned for eternity.

[5] This my favorite Miyazaki story because he and Suzuki stand up to a sexist bully during the height of his power and basically gave him the Japanese equivalent of a middle finger. Again, Fuck Weinstein.

[7] Components of Modernity:

-          -  Shift in the economic system. From a Barter Systems of trade, to Capitalism

-         -     New technologies emerged causing an increased focus on industry and production (resulting in          hydro and steam power, textiles, steel, and increased transportation (sea trade))

-         -    Expansions in Medical Science leading to Population Growth (lower infant mortality)

-          -    Urbanization ( City boom; go where the jobs are)

-          -   Increase in Secularism

[8] More on this, read the book the Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshana Zuboff

[9] Clean air, water and endangered species acts

[10] Ponyo will eventually be included.

[11] In general, a feminist is any person with a political consciousness that promotes the understanding the women are people and champions their progressive advancement in all aspects of human life. 

[12] Secondarily, there may be also a personal stake in San’s ideological position. San became adopted by the Wolf Clan after her birth parents threw her at Moro when she was a baby as a sacrifice to let them live. Knowing this would not engender sympathy for humanity in anyone.

[13] Often referred to as a “Blank Check”