Thursday, December 2, 2021

The Dojo's Top 10 Events of 2021 Encapsulated in Film

 




INTRODUCTION

            As another year ends, it is time for The Sociologist’s Dojo to once again rattle of the top ten sociological films of the year. However, because we are still in a pandemic, (which now has more Variants than a Marvel Character; Hello, Omicron!) and the  altered release schedules of films, coupled with the limited the number of films I saw in the theater due to COVID self-protection; I decided this year, to once again, give readers a list of 10 events of 2021 and the films that encapsulate them. This is obviously not an exhaustive list of events, nor even the ones that are “The Most Sociological, but hopefully represent some of the noteworthy happenings of 2021 and the films that epitomize their essence; either directly or tangentially. With each event I will give a brief explanation of the event, followed by how the film(s) relate to each incident. This list is obviously limited by personal bias, the films I have seen, and my own specialties in Sociology.

            Violence, death, manufactured moral panic(s) Infrastructure wins (sort of), billionaires in space, a Texas abortion law that is right out of a Atwood novel, the end of a high profile conservatorship, and a small little insurrection that nearly transformed our fragile republic into a dictatorship; 2021 has been just as wild and uncertain as its older brother. Below is a curated list of films that, when watched together, gives one a sense of living through 2021, whether we want to relive it, or not.    Enjoy!

 

10)   Rittenhouse and Arbery Cases:

Triple Feature: 

Whose Streets (2017),  



Candyman (2021)

On Nov 19th Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of killing two people and injuring a third during a Black Lives Matter protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.  The trial and decision were criticized for bias toward the defendant. From not being able to call the deceased victims, to Rittenhouse himself being able to hand pick jurors from a tumbler, all of procedural aspects of the trial seemed to be in Rittenhouse’s favor. Yet, while as some legal scholars have pointed out that everything that happened in the case was technically legal, any racial scholar worth their salt will point out the glairing prejudicial legal procedures that repeatedly favor white defendants. Additionally, even outside of the technical legality of this decision, the systemic allowance of an underaged person to be radicalized by a social media call to arms, gain access to an assault rifle, carry it across state lines to “defend” property that is not his own, nor was asked to protect by the owners, should be illegal…full stop.

  The defendants in the Ahmaud Arbrey murder, on the other hand, were convicted only after many barriers to their guilty verdict were circumvented. First, there was a reluctance to prosecute the men involved until the video of the murder was released to the media, sparking national attention. It should be noted that it was the high-profile nature of this case that led to the conviction of Aubrey’s killers, as several other cases with the same or similar circumstances have historically led to acquittal. 

The Rittenhouse acquittal, and the systemic barriers in the Aubrey case, point to the succinct message of  Naomi Zack (2015) in her book White Privilege Black Rights; that these disparities are not about white privilege, it is about the denial of black rights. All defendants should be treated with the respect and caution to convict that Rittenhouse was afforded, and the fact that so many are not, is a denial of their rights. 

            To illustrate these two cases, a triple feature is necessary. Whose Streets (2017), a documentary about the rise of police brutality protests after the death of Michael Brown. This helps to understand the context of the Rittenhouse Case, and the backdrop of which the events unfolded.  American History X, (1998) is included to acknowledge the ties Rittenhouse, the McMichaels and Bryan have with white supremacy ideology and groups.  Nia Decosta’s Candyman (2021) is a great example of the recontextualization of black pain, leading to the manifestation of a vengeful spirit. In the film, several real-life victims of racist violence become a part of the Candyman “hive” to help exact retribution on those that wronged them. I would imagine, in the Candyman universe, Aubery is now a member of the horde.

 

9) Simone Biles backlash at the Olympics:

 Bamboozled (2000)   


            The fundamental issue regarding the backlash that gymnastic superstar Simone Biles received for dropping out of a majority of her events in the 2021 Olympics to focus on mental and physical health has to do with race and the perceived public ownership of Black women’s bodies. This is the psychological fallout of the practice of 400+ years of slavery that still frames Black people as being in the service of white people. According to Rhoden (2006), regardless of how much these individual athletes get paid, if their primary job is to perform for the entertainment of white people, which are disproportionally in positions of authority and a majority of their fanbase, the black athletes are perpetuating the relationships that were cultivated during slavery.

            The messaging of “shut up and perform” is illustrated in Spike Lee’s controversial satire, Bamboozled (2000) which, while leaning into problematic racist stereotypes, presents the performative aspects of black culture for a white audience in stark detail, outside of the glorified mechanism of professional sports.

 

8) Manufactured Moral Panic-Part 1 Vaccines

Network (1976)

 

In the past year, governments and pharmaceutical companies have come together to produce a vaccine for Sars-Cov-2. Yet, regardless of abundant vaccine stocks, the Coronavirus is still with us. Part of this is through the spread of vaccine misinformation by major networks like Fox News, whose empty-headed, mouth breathing pundits tout fear and panic through information that is both vague and misleading. Often, they express hesitancy and outrage over mask and vaccine mandates, even when their own company has stricter rules than the ones outlined by the federal government. This is minimizing the likelihood of heard immunity and has allowed Covid-19 to mutate repeatedly into more virulent and resistant strains.

The 1976 film Network satirizes the way in which the way media companies can manufacture consent (or in this case discontent) to their point of view for profit. The Oscar winning speech given by Ned Beatty towards the end of the film is easily applicable today.

 

7) Manufactured Moral Panic- Part 2 Critical Race Theory

Fahrenheit 451 

                      (1966)

 

                      (2018)

 

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a legal scholarship put forth by Kimberlee Crenshaw, Cornell West and others that identifies how the systemic aspects of racism are built into our social institutions providing built in benefits and barriers for individuals based upon race. Initially, CRT was established to understand legal disparities in arrest, sentencing severity and other aspects of the Criminal Justice System. This mechanism has since been applied to other social institutions pointing to the disparities in experience between people who are white and people of color in our society.  This form of scholarship is not being taught in elementary schools, high schools, or barely in undergraduate college courses. However, this became the focus of right-wing moral panic when their news outlets fueled this false narrative for their own political purposes for the 2022 election. Instead, what these people are outraged about beyond their own attempt at acquiring more political power, is the shift in presenting American history in more accurate ways, outside of the flag waving nationalism common in the past. Thus, opponents to CRT: Firstly, don’t know what it is, and secondly, do not want to reckon with a more precise accounting of history outside of the socialized propaganda meant to pacify the public.

This panic has become such a raging fire that late in 2021, Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin won on a platform of banning CRT in schools. This has accelerated to actual members of a Pennsylvania school board desiring  to ban and burn any book with “offensive” content.          As I said, when I heard about this story: “Time to go back to Bradbury.” So, feel free to choose either the 1966 or 2018 version. Both will get the point across, and remind you of world we are about two steps away from living in.

 

6) Brittany Spears' Conservatorship Ends

Double Feature: 

Teen Spirit (2018) 


The Neon Demon (2016)


Bonus: Crossroads (2002) (because…Obviously)


The perception of celebrity in our culture often obfuscates the reality celebrities are living in.  The media and the entertainment industry, along with fan culture, has ideas about what they thought Brittany Spears life was like… and everyone was wrong.  Brought to the media’s attention this year through the hashtag #FreeBrittany, the public learned that Britany has been under a conservatorship by her father for most of her career. That conservatorship which is usually reserved for individuals without the capacity to care for themselves, has confined Britany for decades. 

The Conservatorship officially ended on Nov 10th of this year,  but it is how we as a public respond to this, and whether or not we commodify her again.  The commodification of celebrity culture, and the dangers that such an industry on the performer, is interestingly depicted in the Elle Fanning helmed Teen Spirit, and Nicolas Winding Refin satirical psychological horror film The Neon Demon.  Readers must watch the films in the order I have provided as the former gives a sense of Brittany’s origins, while the latter captures what we did to Brittany when she was consumed by popular culture.

 

5) The ‘Build Back Better’ Bill Fight:

2012 (2009)


            Every year that the Congressional Budget Office releases the numbers for the budget each fiscal yearn I have always cringed and the hundreds of billions of dollars going towards weapons manufacturing and distribution; while so much less was funneled to needed infrastructure repair. We tend to only make drastic changes to infrastructure after a crisis (Minnesota Bridge collapse circa 2010), and historically, infrastructure was always considered a back burner issue.  Yet, once Biden narrowly defeated Trump in 2020, there was some hope with a Democratic congress and a Democratic executive that we could begin the repairing of infrastructure in Biden’s first year in office. Then the fuckery began. First, Biden attempted to pass a combined 6 Trillion dollar package full of very popular social service spending programs like free community college and paid family leave. Unfortunately, this was deemed “too socialist” and both were gutted in the negotiation process; whittling down the spending package to a poultry 1.2 Trillion. Then, to please some energy lobbyist Senators Krysten Sinema and Joe Manchin stalled the bill for several weeks to gain and flex political clout with lobbyists.

            There is no feature length film about infrastructure inspection or infrastructure repair because, as John Oliver points out in a 2015 segment on Infrastructure, there is nothing abut infrastructure that is interesting or sexy. Yet, Hollywood does have a lot of disaster films, and the one thing that disaster films love to do, is to destroy infrastructure. I picked the 2009 film 2012 because it features a spectacularly irrational sequence of infrastructure destruction where the highway overpass crumbles which sets off a sequence of events that lead to buildings collapsing around a small single engine plane and limousine trying to escape.

 

4) US Pulls out of Afghanistan:

Triple Feature: 

Syriana (2005) 

Three Kings (1999)

 The Stoning of Soraya M (2009)

 

In late August 2021, the last plane left Afghanistan officially ending US military involvement for the last 20 years. The troop removal was no handled well, as many people were killed trying to get to the airport or trampled trying to get on to planes. This chaos and confusion is analogous to the ending of the first Gulf War in the 1990’s depicted in the David O Russell film Three Kings. Additionally, the US government acknowledged a drone striking that took place (which they first reported was a confirmed terrorist strike, was later changed, revealing that the strike was upon a family of innocent civilians (with several children))against a vehicle going to the airport to provide people with water.  A dramatization of a drone strike was a part of the 2009 film Syriana, complete with the confusion and uncertainty that comes with it. Additionally, because the US left in such a haphazard way, a lot of the progress, especially for women and girls in the country since the US Military took over. Now, with the Taliban again in control, there is an expected social regression and an erosion of the rights women have gained over the last two decades.  With that fear in mind, I chose the 2009 drama The Stoning of Soraya M as a reminder that the vicious attack that is in the end of that film, could make a comeback in the region. 

 

3) Billionaires…in…Space!

Elysium (2013) 


During the Summer months of 2021, three billionaires were in a race with each other to see who could be the first and go the furthest into “Space”. I use “space” in quotes here because when we colloquially use the word “space” we typically mean outer space beyond the earth’s atmosphere. This did not happen, not one of three billionaires (Musk, Branson, or Bezos) went to outer space. Instead, they all had varying degrees and times of weightlessness through a sub orbital flight; and unfortunately, they all came back.

Upon their return, astronauts that have been to space have come back with a greater sense of humanism.  Seeing the earth this way gave them an epiphany about the importance of environmentalism and reducing human conflicts. It put into perspective for them that we have but one world, and we better preserve it. People who were widely expecting the earth to give emotional catharsis to these sentient flesh sacks of money were sadly mistaken. First, Jeff Bezos tone deafly thanking his Amazon employees, many of them under sweatshop like conditions with a history of union busting, for making his space flight possible. Then, realizing the media expected him to have the aforementioned epiphany, Bezos made a thinly veiled speech on the commercialization of space and use it to get rid of trash and pollution.  

 This is the result of the defunding of the space program over the last 20 years, leaving space to now be commercialized by rich white dudes with a god complex. This is perfectly illustrated by Neill Blomkamp’s 2013 film Elysium that depicts earth as an overpopulated polluted trash planet in which the rich live on a space station in the earth’s orbit with the very best medical technology in the universe.

 

2) Texas Abortion Law:

Double Feature: 

Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Always (2020)

 Unpregnant (2020) 


In 2021, Texas circumvented Roe vs Wade and brought challenge to this “super precedent” that was ignored by The Supreme Court. The Texas state law allows for individuals to bring civil cases against anyone helping a woman obtain an abortion, regardless of cases of rape or incest. Suddenly, everyone from the abortion doctor to the lift driver that brought her to the clinic could be sued by Texas civilians (not even in the same county) for $10,000 plus court fees.  In the words of Justice Sotomayor, this has allowed all Texans to become bounty hunters.

As of this writing, oral arguments have begun in the Mississippi Supreme Court case that could further erode the protections women have altogether, and at first glance, it is not looking good. Therefore, I wanted to put on this list a pair of films that speak to the Abortion Process and the power of women supporting other women through such a difficult decision. The first, Eliza Hittman’s Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Always is a drama about Autumn and her cousin, Skylar, traveling from Pennsylvania to New York for Autumn to get the procedure. The story is poignant with sobering pragmatism. The Second film, Unpregnant, while also dealing with the same subject matter, is a road movie friendship comedy. Both films treat the actual procedure with care, grace, and dignity. Though it is tempered wit the fact that all four women across these two films could have been subject to prosecution if any of this happened in Texas and a handful of other states.   Remember, Abortion is a Human Right for anyone with a uterus.

 

1) Jan 6th Insurrection:

The Purge: Election Year (2016) 


I have already written exclusively about the January 6th insurrection earlier in the year, focusing on the impact of media consumption and whiteness on protestors; ultimately leading to the events that unfolded. As we approach the one-year anniversary of the event, we are seeing just how deep this plot goes. So far, the investigation has handed down indictment to several of the rioters, many of whom were in denial that they would even be prosecuted. The investigation has also implicated several members of congress who were involved in the planning of the coup attempt (even so far as giving guided tours to the insurrectionist just days before the event) no one has yet been arrested or removed from office.

The only cinematic choice to represent the events on Jan 6th is the third installment of The Purge franchise Election Year, primarily because the film ends with the Anti-Purge candidate winning the election, outlawing Purge Nights, and as a result, purge supporters staged violent uprisings across the country, protesting election results leading to the fourth film The Forever Purge (2021). While I still have some hope that we are several years away from this becoming an actual reality, the end of this film was a little too close for comfort.

  


CONCLUSION

Going into 2022, I am less optimistic about all aspects of society, and our ability to weather the storm.  From the approaching midterms to Covid’s consistent threats, to environmental depletion 2022 just like the last two years before might be yet another brick out of the wall of civilization. Therefore, it is important to remember human and civil rights for all people and understand your place in the world. We fight as hard as we can for as long as we can. If you need to personalize these collectivist ideas in order to support it, so be it. But here, in the last essay of 2021, I leave you with the parting words of The 12th Doctor: “laugh hard, run fast, be kind.”   See you all in 2022.  

 


REFERENCES

 

Roden, William C. 2006. Forty Million Dollar Slaves: The Rise, Fall, and Redemption of the Black Athlete  New York: Three Rivers Press

 

Zack, Naomi 2015. White Privilege and Black Rights: The Injustice of US Police Racial Profiling and Homicide New York: Rowman and Littlefield