Showing posts with label The Force Awakens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Force Awakens. Show all posts

Saturday, December 7, 2019

The Films of Hayao Miyazaki: Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind





The Second film in my analysis of The Films of Hayao Miyazaki is the post-apocalyptic fantasy  Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind.   This is the film that put Miyazaki and his team on the map allowing him to develop and create his own studio. While not known at the time, but Nauscicca embodies everything that we have come to identify as quintessentially “Miyazaki”. Many of the elements, themes and struggles in the film become a standard template for Miyazaki films in the future, eventually identifying as Miyazaki’s signature. Thus, it is through the film’s plot, context (both social and historical), and various themes that make Nausicaa the first pure Miyazaki film.




THE (NEAR) BIFURCATION OF MIYAZAKI
When looking at the totality of Miyazaki’s work, much like a lot of categorizations, you can divide most of Miyazaki’s work in to one of two categories based upon their intended audience. There are Miyazaki films that are more clearly marketed for adults (dealing with heavier themes and darker subtext) and those films that are marketed to children (the films that are socialization tools that have strong and powerful messages for what it means to be an adult usually involving young children as the protagonist).


Miyazaki Films for Adults                                       Miyazaki films for Children
Castle of Cagliostro (1979)                                        Castle in the Sky (1986)
Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind (1984)                 My Neighbor Totoro (1988)
Porco Roso (1992)                                                      Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)
Princess Mononoke (1997)                                         Ponyo (2008)
Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)                                     Spirited Away (2001)
The Wind Rises (2013)                                                How Do I Live? (2020)

However, because binaries are unequal social constructs that have been proven time and again to not fit the complex diversity of reality; it can be argued (correctly in my opinion) that many of these Miyazaki films straddle the line between being solely for adults or exclusively for children. In fact, many of his films involve children as the protagonists, but also has them confront very adult ideas of work, life, and existence. Therefore, while the methodology of this list is an easy shorthand for discerning the more dramatic of Miyazaki’s stories compared to those that are more lighthearted, all of Miyazaki’s films can be enjoyed by all.

          



     PLOT
1000 years after the collapse of industrialization and the “7 days of fire” that covered the planet, Humanity is divided into large “Kingdoms” which are interlocked in battle between themselves and the environment which is personified by the Ohm, large trilobite creatures that, in fits of rage  attack the humans. The air is toxic and the spores of the forest jeopardize the meager civilizations that have survived. The titular Nausicaa is the Princess of the Valley of the Wind, one of the human Kingdoms that is positioned in a valley closest to the sea. Its constant breeze and lush forest protect the kingdom from the toxic spores that have been known to invade and destroy a civilization. This is all put in jeopardy when waring rival kingdoms invade the Valley seeking an ancient weapon that will suppress the toxic forest and allow one kingdom total supremacy.  Nausicaa must act as a bridge between the forest and humanity, quelling tension and aggression on both sides and needing to find the most direct and efficient way to achieve long lasting peace. 



HISTORICAL CONTEXT
          
   (re)gaining trust
            Miyazaki’s previous film  The Castle ofCagliostro was not well received at the box office regardless of wining the prestigious Ofuji Noburo Animation Award[1] in part due to the way that Miyazaki “softened” the Lupin characters so that they would not seem so nihilistic or sexist. Many people chided that it was not “the real” (or to be more accurate) “their” Lupin[2]. As a result of this backlash, and poor box office performance Miyazaki’s subsequent film ideas could not get any traction at any major animation studio. He was seen as too big of a risk.  Therefore, as a proof of concept he published the two volume Manga version of Nausicaa beginning in 1979, first published in 1982. The Manga was a huge success (selling over 11 million copies) which paved the way for the film adaptation.
           
  Leaving it all on the field
The constant setbacks, detours and delays that Miyazaki and his team experienced attempting to bring Nausicaa to fruition left them feeling disillusioned. This despondence and trepidation was well warranted. Miyazaki and his team had yet to establish themselves (Takahata’s ground breaking film Grave of the Fireflies only gets made until after Nausicaa’s success) and they were worried that if Nausicaa was received as well as Castle of Cagliostro, no one else would allow them to make another film. Thus, feeling that this may be their only shot at expressing themselves they began to lace Nausicaa with all of the values, beliefs, ideals, and tropes that would become a signature of the then forthcoming Studio Ghibli and Miyazaki in particular.
          
     


    Warriors of the Wind
            While the film did very well in a majority of the international Markets in the United States, the distribution companies of Manson International and Showmen, Inc edited and recut Miyazaki’s original film into what they titled Warriors of the Wind. This recut/edit of the film not only changed the focus away from Nausicaa to more of an ensemble piece[3]; it also cut out 25 minutes of footage. This lead to a lot of the themes being lost or changed (particularly those about female empowerment and environmentalism).Including:
·         In this version the Ohm are seen and understood only as aggressive antagonists
·         The titular “warriors” use the “God warrior” to destroy the Ohm
·          All of the character development for Nausicaa (Now called Princess Zandra) was cut

Bring completely dissatisfied with the actions of the US distributors, Miyazaki mandated final cut for all of his projects once Studio Ghibli was created. This was to make sure that he could control the fate of his finished films and make sure that audiences could view his film in the way that he had intended.





SOCIAL CONTEXT
In taking a critical sociological perspective on Miyazaki’s films and specifically Nausicaä one gets the sense through both his Manga, and the film that he believes that film has a duty to say something about the world in an attempt to make it better than how he left it.  As indicated in my introduction to Miyazaki’s work he often wrestles with the feeling and self-perception that he has not done enough for the world, that his films are nothing compared to the real work that needs to be done.[4] Yet, through his films complex themes and a focus and representation of femininity and a divergent look at the “ Princess culture”, Miyazaki, through his films, has provided progressive cultural messaging that is the foundation of any progressive social policies or social justice movement. In Nausicaä specifically, because they were  unsure of its success and longevity they packed the film with a dense variety of themes, that he eventually spreads out in his later films.





Anti Capitalism/ Industrialism
In Nausicaa’s opening narration, we are known that it is a thousand years since the collapse of industrialization. The basic sociological understanding of history points to the correlation between the rise of industrialization and early capitalism. The idea that the industrial technology shifted how we live (from a pre-modern era to a modern era) that it created new social and cultural norms, ways of behavior that allowed capitalism as an economic system to grow, and thrive.

This summation of Marx and Weber’s thoughts on the subject can provide some illustration:

Marxio 



   
Is Capitalism Bad For You?





While we don’t get a full explanation as to what happened to cause the fall of industrialization or what truly happened during the “Seven days of Fire”. Though I would assume due to the collusion between Capitalism, Industry and the Military and the endless wars that we (especially the United States) fight it is conceivable and some might even say inevitable that we will eventually destroy ourselves. This is something Miyazaki understood all too well.

In Nausicaä, Miyazaki discusses ancient biological weapons that were stock piled and used against warring factions that we can assume led to the aforementioned “7 days of fire”. These weapons are clear allegories to the nuclear bomb (something Japaneseanimation has always been obsessed with).  Being born in 1941, Miyazaki found the experience of WWII and the bombs informative as a child, and then used the ancient weapons as a way that he could talk about the dangers of nuclear proliferation…which is also a product of the toxic, unregulated, late stage capitalism.    







Environmentalism
                     

   …Industrial civilizations sprawl across the face of the planet plundering the soil of its riches fouling the air, and remolding life forms at will. Cities burned, welling up as clouds of posion…Almost all of the surface of the earth was transformed into a sterile wasteland  Hayao Miyazaki Nausicaä Manga



It is through this quote in the opening cover of the first volume that lays out the beginning of Miyazaki’s thesis on environmentalism that would eventually span a number of his films.  Here Miyazaki is drawing a direct causation between industrialization and environmental destruction. According to Jorgensen et al[5] (2018) the current drivers of climate change are economic systems (capitalism as previously mentioned) and Consumption. Our consumption practices, especially for energy are dangerously unsustainable which fuels environmental depletion.
-          
       The US is 4.5% of the world’s population
-          But it makes up 21.8% of the global energy use
-          31.8% of industrial consumption
-          39.6% of residential and commercial energy purposes
-          28.6% of the world’s transportation consumption


This equates that the US alone consumes an average of 40% of Global resources.
This desire for resources has led to practices of acquiring those resources quickly and cheaply that are often damaging to the environment, practices that have a long history dating back to Industrialization: Burning coal, deforestation, strip mining, offshore drilling. Unfortunately, the US is often the model for global capitalist success. Which means that other newly industrialized countries like China, are following similar industrial practices as the United States, with greater production and reckless environmental abandon.

Mark Maslin addresses this in his book Climate Change: a Very Short Introduction when he states:


 “Climate change challenges the very economic theories that have dominated global economics for the last 35 years and that we need to build a new [economic and] political system that will allow collective action and more equal distribution of wealth, resources and opportunities.” P 172


This is because industrialization and capitalism has created value in cultural ideas skills and behaviors that result in environmental destruction.  

-          Just 4 % of big five energy producers went to renewable energy research and implementation [6]
-          Climate deniers often manufacture the threat that being eco-friendly is a threat to Capitalism. This was the same excuse that was leveed against abolitionists, The occupy movement about redistribution and any kind of substantive change
-         
      The Solution to the modern ecological problem is:  the radical reordering of our economic political systems that are antithetical to the “free market” belief system[7]
-          We need to plan economies based upon collective priorities and need rather than corporate profitability. This the way that the sustainability becomes Macro in focus
-           To accomplish this, it takes strong Government action at all levels

In the context of Miyazaki, It is fascinating to see that during the time that we gain the ability to measure our impact on the environment[8], Miyazaki also gives us this film as an environmentalist cautionary tale. Through Nausicaä, Miyazaki removes all sub text, and in the text of the film states the importance of the forest to the air quality of the kingdom; positioning Nausicaa’s kingdom as geopolitically valuable due to the wind being able to keep the poisonous spores from festering.  The later revelation that it was the forest that is trying to clean the air of pollutants and save humanity is a mic drop of a conclusion.  






Feminism/ Female Empowerment (better princess culture)
            Miyazaki has always been interested in telling stories about the empowerment and humanity of young girls and women. This has led Miyazaki and his work to be embraced by feminists. As well he should, as he has always been positioned as the antithesis to a western princess culture. Also, it is difficult in the increasing corporatization of (the princess) culture through the Disney monolith that has commodified all aspects of the childhood of multiple generations to find something that is not reinforcing tired stereotypes on the next generation or weaponizing them through nostalgia for adults today.

             Like the trees in Nausicaä, Miyazaki films act as a barrier of protection against this homogeneous toxicity by having the radical idea that women are three-dimensional people.  And while, yes, the monolith[9] is learning some better lessons these days, the change is usually motivated by profit rather than altruism; and the changes that they make are ultimately derivative of Miyazaki from 30 years ago.

EXAMPLE: REY IS NAUSICCA



EXHIBIT A



EXHIBIT B






  
                                                           
CONCLUSION
            Nausicca of the Valley of the Wind is one of the best princess films in existence and it acts as the proof of concept for Miyazaki’s entire career with the establishment of Studio Ghibli. A studio which is not motivated by profit, and seeks to only be able to make enough money to keep the lights on, and the creators working.  Nausicca has everything that is essential to a Miyazaki film. It is a film that represents the essence of its creator/director that it is the film that encapsulates his feelings on the world.   See it. Own it. Share it.                                                                     


[1] Miyazaki would go on to win this award an additional four times in his career with Nausicaa, Castle in the Sky, Totoro, and Ponyo also winning this award.  
[2] You see this happen even today whether that be the “release the Snyder cut” weirdos or the petition for The Last Jedi to no longer be canon.
[3] The cover adds a lot more men to the story that are not in the original film.
[4] In Sociology, there is a concept put forth by Charles H. Cooley called reference groups. These are individuals living or dead that we use to regulate and evaluate our own behavior. In reading about how Miyazaki feels that he has yet to do something significant makes me wonder who is in his reference group. In other words: who is he comparing himself to that feels so inadequate?
[6] Naomi Klein (2011) “Capitalism vs. The Climate.” The Nation
[7] Naomi Klein (2011) “Capitalism vs. The Climate.” The Nation
[8] We gain the ability to measure atmospheric CO2 in the 1980’s
[9] Disney

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

The Machete Cut and the Diminishing Margin Utility of Star Wars



INTRODUCTION

            I grew up with Star Wars, and I loved it. However, my childhood love of Star Wars was very, very specific. At the time, I was not interested in Space, Planets, the rebellion, blasters, war or the overall scope of George Lucas’s Sci-Fi Opera.  My love of Star Wars as a child was derived from my love and passion for the martial arts.  Therefore the only thing that I found interesting in the whole Star Wars saga was the elements that connected it to the martial arts; meaning Jedi and the Sith (Samurai) The Force (Ki, and Zen philosophy), and lightsabers (Katanas).[1]
As I got older, I dug deep into the history and the background of Star Wars to keep this connection alive. I found out that the term Jedi was derived from the Japanese term Jidaigeki meaning “period piece” which for the Japanese usually meant a story involving Samurai. George Lucas was greatly influenced by the work of Akira Kurosawa (who was ironically, influenced by American Westerns), specifically The Hidden Fortress and Seven Samurai to the point that Lucas originally offered the role of Obi-Wan Kenobi to Tashiro Mifune a frequent collaborator with Kurosawa and whom some may call his muse.[2]



Additionally, I started getting interested Zen Buddhism and philosophy by initially hanging on the words of Jedi Master Yoda whom encouraged “No mindedness”, and Passive yet passionate embrace of the life energy (Ki) in the universe. I loved (and still love) these aspects of Star Wars. Yet, whenever I decide to sit down and watch any Star Wars film I find myself skipping to, or, only paying attention to those scenes. As I grew in my appreciation for film as a medium and a mechanism for storytelling, this dissecting cycle of only watching (what I consider to be) the best bits of the Star Wars films[3] seemed masochistic. Why was I holding on to these bits and pieces of a grander story, and why did I not feel overtaken by the phenomena that is Star Wars?  The answer has everything to do with context.

ANALYSIS  
 
     “ The Personal is also Political.”- C. Wright Mills

            Sociologically speaking (from a symbolic Interactionist point of view) everything is about context.  The reality that we live in and the “truths that we cling to” as Obi Wan would say, depend on our interpretation of a specific social, cultural and historical context.  In sort, the time period when I saw Star Wars, what was happening historically both in my life and in society at that time, impact the effect of the film and in what ways that it resonated with me.  
Not being born when Episode IV was released, and being too young to see the other two films in the original trilogy during their initial theatrical run, my first exposure to Star Wars was years later on home video. Therefore, by the time that I had seen the films, the hype fanfare and cultural impact of Star Wars had waned, migrating into geek pop culture of which, at the time I had yet to be inducted.
 Additionally, it is important to note that I initially saw the original Star Wars Trilogy in reverse order. I saw it in the order of VI, V, IV. Also, I watched episodes VI and V many more times than Episode IV, because we had a taped copy of Episodes V, and VI  but not of IV. I first saw A New Hope in a hospital recovering from surgery when I was 12, many years after repeatedly seeing the other two films.  Thus, I did not feel the fear for Han Solo as he was frozen in Carbonite, the peril of Luke Skywalker as he faced Vader on Bespin, or the surprise of the Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader reveal.  Because of this, much of what is in A New Hope seemed cheaper to me than in the other two films; old and out dated when compared even to its immediate predecessors.  This became even more apparent when the Prequel trilogy was released.

THE PREQUEL TRILLOGY


News of the production of the prequel trilogy first reached my ears when I was in high school. Hearing about the production it seemed like a dream come true. I was promised more of the Star Wars aspects that I loved: More Jedi, More Sith, more of “the Force”, and more lightsabers! I became even more obsessed when one of my best friends[4] told me that in this prequel trilogy (that focused on the fall of Anakin Skywalker to the dark side and the rise of  Darth Vader) would show “the epic duel between Obi-Wan and Anakin” that ended, in his mind with Obi-Wan dismembering Anakin and throwing him in a lava pit.[5] This was also the first time that I realized (through my friend telling me) that Vader, being a quadruple amputee, was a Person with a disability. (PWD)[6]
Unfortunately, whenever Darth Vader is discussed in regards to disability, it is usually only in the context of representation (of people with disabilities in media) and it is usually negative ( his disability is used to represent his villainy)  rather than positive ( that he is a PWD that is feared and respected by all in the galaxy and has reached near the height of political and religious power ( being mythic and second in abilities only to The Emperor)[7]  Needless to say the promise  of the prequels excited me; the reality was far different.
The prequel trilogy spans my entire college career, from graduating high school through grad school. In that time, and given the socio-political context in which it became a piece of popular culture, I was able to engage with the prequel trilogy in a far different way than the original trilogy. Firstly, I saw this trilogy in the theater, in order of its release, which allowed me to be properly heightened by the narrative and not be spoiled. Secondly, I saw these films when I was just getting into Sociology as a discipline and the social analysis of popular culture. Because of this, I am an apologist of the prequels in one very specific way: aside from all of the problems around it THE PREQUEL TRILOGY IS GREAT STORY ABOUT THE RISE OF FASCISM  FROM DEMOCRACY THROUGH THE MECHANISM OF WAR.



Historical Context.[8]
 By the time the empire is established in 2005 at the end of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith,  politically we were already a few months into George W. Bush’s second term. The War on Terror was in full swing as was the War in Iraq. So, seeing a political figure concentrate power in his executive office[9] by throwing us into a false war, was pertinent at the time. Though, Lucas said that the idea for the story, written decades before George W. Bush took office, was more reminiscent of Julius Cesar than the politics of the day. However, this fact has done little to stop the apt comparison between Vader/ Palpatine and Bush/ Cheney. Ironically, this comparison is often on a sliding scale, as these same comparisons are currently being made with the Trump Administration[10]



Biographical Context

    I saw Episode I: The Phantom Menace on midnight at my local Cineplex.[11]Due to the heightened situation I was in, and the effect of emotional contagion of the rest of the fans in the screening we walked away having enjoyed the film.  Yet, as the power of the experience waned, I began to see the enormous flaws with the film[12]. As the number of flaws I found grew, kept going back to the things that I loved about Star Wars and focused on what the film did give me: More Jedi, and more dynamic lightsaber duals.  With this understanding of exactly what I wanted from a Star Wars film, paltry as it was, it effectively lowered my expectations for Episodes II and III. I looked passed plot holes, wooden dialogue and acting, lack of chemistry between leads, and even more sexism and racism. I blocked all of it out, and focused on the multitude of lightsaber duels, especially the ones involving Yoda, Palpatine, Mace Windu, Dooku, and the fabled Anakin vs. Obi-Wan. Soon, whenever I went back to any of the Star Wars (including the original trilogy) I would find myself skipping around and only watching scenes that were about the force, or those that involved a lightsaber duel…and nothing else.  That means that the six film- 13+ hour story, for me, can be reduced to about 60 min.[13]



THE MACHETE CUT

Recently, in preparation for Rogue One: A Star Wars Story I wanted to go back and watch the preceding films (Episodes I II and III), however I did not want it to turn into me just skipping around to the bits and pieces that I liked. It was then that a colleague of mine (and fellow geek) told me about the machete cut, otherwise known as “The Machete Order” which is a viewing order for the first 6 films in the Star Wars saga that, according to him, and compelling.  In short, he and others are correct.
The Machete Order of the first two completed trilogies connects the “best” parts of the Star Wars story and jettisons the rest. The order (which is Episodes IV, V, II, III, and VI) retains the mystery and cliff hanging reveal of Luke Skywalker’s parentage, while maintaining continuity with the (now canonical) special editions of the original trilogy (i.e. Hayden Christiansen showing up at the end of Return of the Jedi) while fixing the errors in continuity by eliminating the need for Episode I.
The creator of The Machete Order surmises (correctly in my view) that Episode I: The Phantom Menace is meaningless to the overall story. Nothing that happens in Episode I is impactful in the overall arc of either Anakin or Luke Skywalker, not to mention that the ten year gap (in story) between Episode I and Episode II requires a large amount or reorientation anyway. Plus without Episode I,  there are no mention of Midi-chlorians, boring pod races, and an Unnecessary Sith, that has no impact on the story (unlike Christopher Lee’s Count Dooku).
In the Machete order, we get the danger of the empire and then after the end of Episode V, when our heroes are at their lowest point, we flash back to see how the Universe got to its current state. With all of the teases in Empire fresh in our heads from “I am your Father,” and “For 500 years did I train Jedi.  Once a council did I keep on who was to be trained.” to “That boy was our last hope.” “No, there is another.” watching Episodes II and III directly after that capitalizes on those teases in a more satisfying way that watching it in either Episode Order( I-VI ) or Release Order (IV, V, VI, I, II, III). However, even with the Machete order, I found it difficult to get through several parts of each film (aside from Empire, I will concede that Episode V, is a good film), I began to question whether or not The Star Wars Saga is really any good at all.


THE MARGIN OF DIMINISHED UTILITY

          The margin of diminished utility is an economic term to explain that with the continued consumption of a particular product, the greater the since of dissatisfaction one has with that product as a result.  An easy analogy is that of drug addicts, the more drugs they consume the less likely they will achieve the same high.  Though many might have a better association with the common phrase “Too much of a good thing.”. With each new Star Wars film we get, it seems to reorient out perception of the previous films. Sometimes, to fill in gaps, and other times to address criticism decades after the film’s release.[14] In the wake of this perception shift is often novelty, mystery, and in some cases actor performances, are sacrificed all in the name of continuity.  To that end, the newer iterations of Star Wars (especially since being purchased by Disney) spoon feed the audience colorful forms of childhood Nostalgia that, when it wears off or is wiped away, reveals an unoriginal story that is not only boring but not well crafted.  There are several examples of this.


     Exhibit A: The Prequels

            Outside of my unique perspective on the prequels, the majority of the Star Wars fans (not necessarily those in the mainstream) hate the prequels to the point that many of them do not consider them cannon.  In their mind, what George Lucas did was tantamount to murdering their childhood.  Yet, as indicated above, the reason many people hate the prequels is because of the way it changes our understanding of the original trilogy, mainly it weakens the badass all powerful villain of Vader, to nothing more than a whiney, petulant child that has such an ego that he never learned to accept loss to became a control freak. Through the Prequels, all of Vader’s menace evaporates, and he becomes pitiful.
            We must remember the importance of biographical context. The point at which you are exposed to Star Wars, in your life makes all the difference.  Many people who love the original trilogy as something sacrosanct often saw it when they were a kid, and the film informed on their sense of self.  You are obviously not going to get that same experience when you watch a film that is for children in your 20’s or 30’s; that is, unless they give you the exact same film (more on that later). In fact many people that saw the prequel trilogy when they were children or (gasp) saw the prequels first have a much more favorable opinion of them.      
         


          Exhibit B: The Original Trilogy

            If you take away nostalgia, and the biographical context of most audience members, what they may find is that most of the original trilogy is not very good.  Many characters aren’t fleshed out, or they are tropes[15]; it is full of poorly written dialogue delivered by many individuals that can barely act.[16] Yet, many of us want to retain these childhood memories of Star Wars, preferring instead to rely on our memory (which is suspect) rather than the sobering reality that Star Wars is a better pop cultural phenomena than they are films.
            The pop cultural impact of Star Wars cannot be denied. It is beyond itself. However, the idea of Star Wars, its merchandizing and its spectacle get muddled with the quality of the actual film. Whether this is caused by  mob mentality or group think, or something in the water, Star Wars soon to be retitled Episode IV due to its success, became something bigger than the low budget independent film it was intended to be.
The major part of the Star Wars phenomena, is not, as I have stated, because of the groundbreaking, or interesting story that the film tells. George Lucas by his own account is not a good storyteller[17] Instead, the genius of Lucas is his business acumen and his willingness to experiment. This desire for experimentation however can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it lead to the innovation of Star Wars’s visual effects at the time of its release (allowing the trilogy to continue). On the other hand, this drive of innovation caused him to also come under fire (from fans) once he released the special editions in the mid 1990’s with new VFX shots and added content[18].



Exhibit C: Episode VII: The Force Awakens

            One of the best examples of the problem with the continuing Star Wars Saga in relation to the margin of diminished utility is Episode VII: The Force Awakens. Before I become too overly critical, I have to say I commend Disney in their ads campaigns as they sharply leaned into the desired Nostalgia in a fully committed way.  Even though, as stated, I have a complicated relationship with Star Wars, I was all in for this film[19] I was swept away by the marketing, tearing up as I saw Han Solo on the Millennium Falcon saying “Chewie, we’re home.” in the final seconds of the first trailer.  I was so enthralled by the second trailer that I was a part of the group that crashed the internet trying to buy tickets. Disney had me, and I knew it. I was still enthralled during the opening fanfare, and the opening crawl. I embraced and was ecstatic about the increased amounts of diverse representation of people of color and women that were finally added to the story. However, as the story progressed, I slowly realize that I had been duped.
            I Hate Episode VII: The Force Awakens.  I hate it for the following reasons. Firstly, before its release, Disney eliminated the expanded universe in order to have complete control of the story moving forward. While I understand this from a business perspective, it eliminates years of work of many creative people and frankly, sounds like something the Empire would do.  Secondly, this film is a remake masking as a sequel.[20] It is a reshuffling of the plot and characters of a New Hope. BB-8 is R2, Rey is Luke,  Kylo is Vader, Poe is Han, and Han is Obi-Wan. There is a “Super” Death Star, and the Mcguffin is Luke Skywalker. Thus, outside of the nostalgia of seeing these characters again, the film is boring, predictable and overall lazy filmmaking. Thirdly, they killed Han.[21]
            Even though this film made over 2 billion dollars, there is a danger in relying on nostalgia as it can lead people to be complacent and malleable to antiquated ideas, which can have disastrous consequences. Yet, it seems with similar films being released around or just after  The Force Awakens, and the fact that these films make billions of dollars it is clear this requel trend is here to stay, and that The Star Wars Saga will not be ending anytime soon.

CONCLUSION

 Simply, the more Star Wars we get, the less satisfied we become.  As the Star Wars story continues into infinity it is the new thing, the fresh thing that will be embraced, as long as it makes us long for the past. Each new expanding or continuing story will reshape how we see all of the previous films.  In this cathartic process of writing about Star Wars I have come to the uncomfortable realization that I do not like the story of  Star Wars  that much. There are many other similar stories told by true auteurs, providing a more satisfying, sometimes self-contained, story that The Star Wars Saga has not achieved. I will however always embrace the pop cultural flavor of Star Wars through the movies and other merchandising material. The importance of the Jedi, Darth Vader and the concept of “the force” still informs me as a person. Therefore, I will always have investment in anything that begins “A long time ago, in a galaxy far far way…  



[1] This was my first experience of the merging of two interests: my love of Sci-Fi and of the martial arts. After watching each film I would annoyingly beg my father to duel me with a pair of plastic swords
[3] At least the original trilogy
[4] To this day, whom read a lot of the expanded Universe that has since become non-canonical
[5] Upon hearing this I had instantly created a “head cannon” where the dismemberment of Anakin happened periodically throughout the duel. I envisioned Anakin fighting with only one arm for a time only to ceremoniously end up on some scaffolding above the open mouth of an active volcano as Obi-Wan finally takes out Anakin’s legs that sends him tumbling over the side and into lava.
[6] Thus began my love affair with Darth Vader, that has grown far beyond the films.  Yes, Darth Vader has become an iconic piece of pop culture outside of the Star Wars Saga, but as a person with a disability myself, I see Darth Vader as a champion of the disability community.
[7] The Next Character profile I will do will be on Darth Vader.
[9] Which Palpatine was able to do by Manipulating Jar Jar Binks into granting him “emergency powers” In Episode II: Attack of the Clones
[11] As the story goes, it was the Friday of the premiere in May 1999. I was working on a rough draft of a paper that wasn’t due for another 4 weeks.  My mother, thinking that I was working too hard, called two of my friends to come and “get” me.  They came to the front door; my mother opened it “He’s in his room.” I heard from behind my closed door. Suddenly, my bedroom door flung open. “You’re coming with us to Episode 1.!” My friend shouted “ No!” I cried and a wrestling match ensued.  It concluded with my friend putting me in a back bear hug while the other grabbed my feet and together they carried me down the stairs and out the door (which was being held by my mother) they thanked my mother as we passed and they placed me in the back seat of the car, and took me to the movie.
[12] Midi-clorians, pod racing, Jake Loyd, weird puppet Yoda, stinted dialogue, poor story construction that was a rehash of the original trilogy, not to mention the copious amounts of Racism and Sexism throughout all seven films.
[14] A practice that Rogue One seems to be continuing
[15] Luke Skywalker, Obi Wan Kenobi
[16] This is excluding Alec Guinness and Peter Cushing
[17] Heck, in a video embedded above, Lucas basically reveals that he stole a lot from Kurosawa (even attempting to steal his main actor)
[18] The Most outrageous change he made, that actually effected the arc of a main character was having Greedo Shoot at Han first rather than Han shooting first
[19] Going so far as to buy advanced tickets and waiting in line for hours to get a proper seat for me and my friends
[20] This has become so blatant in Hollywood that it has spawned a new term “Requel”
[21] I understand the irony of this statement as I have railed against Nostalgia