Saturday, October 25, 2014

The Films of Christopher Nolan: The Dark Knight Rises





INTRODUCTION

            The 8th film in my continuing analysis of The Films of Christopher Nolan is the final chapter in The Dark Knight Trilogy: The Dark KnightRises. Like its predecessor, Rises, (or TDKR) is a genre bending masterpiece; seamlessly weaving together a disaster picture, and a war movie into a Batman film. This eclectic mix of genres, score, cinematography, writing and direction along with the conclusion of Batman/Bruce Wayne’s story (started in BatmanBegins) elevates this film into the stratosphere.  Additionally, the technical craftsmanship, superb acting, and multi-layered plot make Rises a rare commodity: a satisfying third film of a trilogy that is so emotionally gripping and powerful, that it enriches the overall experience of the entire trilogy itself.




HISTORICAL CONTEXT

            Even before production began on TDKR, the film was marred by controversy and unrealistic expectations. First, the death of Heath Ledger in January of 2008 fundamentally reshaped the tone and plot of any potential third film. Originally, before Ledger’s passing, it was widely assumed that he (as The Joker) would return in the third film.  After Leger died, Team Nolan took an extra year (The Dark Knight Rises coming out 4 years after The Dark Knight instead of the typical three years) to break the story and write the screenplay. From outside interviews, Nolan has said that it was the inclusion of the 8 year gap (time laps between The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises) that was the catalyst for the story.  This would allow Nolan to create a story about the end of Batman and Bruce Wayne’s career, something that has never been put on screen, thereby completing Bruce Wayne’s journey and the trilogy itself.
            Secondly, the film had to complete with the expectations set by the critically acclaimed, award winning, and immensely popular The Dark Knight. A movie that has become more than just a product of our culture; but a part of it. Even in the few years since its release, The Dark Knight has completely changed the superhero genre, giving it more legitimacy and validity as a respected medium of filmmaking. This was a once in a lifetime experience of a film that cinematically captured the social issues of domestic terrorism and surveillance illustrating, albeit dramatically, with a “taste for the theatrical, the fears that we live with in modern society.   Add to that the film being punctuated by the death of Heath Ledger and you get a recipe for greatness that is hard, if not impossible to replicate. 
            With such lofty expectations coming off of a successful and culturally impactful film that The Dark Knight (TDK) became, two things happened:
1) Nolan’s third film was never (at least in the eyes of the public, and maybe a lot of fans) going to live up to its predecessor.  This was, in part, due to the longer four year gap between the second and third films in the trilogy. During that time, fans were able to speculate and create hypothesis on how the next film was going to continue the Batman story[1]. The long production schedule involved in filmmaking allowed many fans, and the public, to become married to their version of what the third film would be. This inevitably would leave them dissatisfied, annoyed and even a bit angry that they didn’t get the film that they wanted, one that they built up in their heads for years. Thus for many a Batman fan, they were setting themselves up for disappointment years before they even stepped into the theatre to watch the completed film. 
            2) The Cultural Capital garnered by The Dark Knight could not be repeated for TDKR. As I mentioned in my review for The Dark Knight, much of the film’s gargantuan success was due to the character of The Joker, Heath Ledger’s performance, and his death; the studio cashing in (quite unintentionally) on the public’s morbid curiosity; causing them to flock to the theatres to see Ledger’s final fully completed performance.  Through the tragedy that was Ledger’s death lead to the Dark Knight receiving even more positive buzz and good word of mouth; and while The Dark Knight Rises did have its share of tragedy surrounding it, it was one that hurt the overall domestic box office rather than help it.
            On July, 20th 2012 at a 12am screening[2] of The Dark Knight Rises in Aurora, CO; James Holmes (wearing tactical military gear and brandishing an arsenal of weaponry that included a shot gun, a semi-automatic rifle, a handgun, and smoke and tear gas canisters) entered the theater through an emergency exit and began firing into the crowd.  The crowd was slow to react to Holmes, as many of them believed that he was in costume for the event (much like many other patrons) or was part of the Theatre’s publicity stunt to promote the film.  It was only when the tear gas canisters went off did people begin to panic.  In the ensuing mayhem 12 people were murdered and another 82 people were injured.
            This tragedy left a taint on the film that kept the film from surpassing The Dark Knight in terms of both popularity and domestic box office numbers. Additionally, it all but killed the positive word of mouth, I believe the film would have received (in fact you could assume that the film’s ability to do so well despite this tragedy is a testament to just how good Rises actually is). Many people were afraid to go to the movies at all after the shooting let alone The Dark Knight Rises. This was exacerbated by Holmes dying his hair orange and calling himself “The Joker” and the news media initially labeling the shooting “The Batman Massacre”. Also, one of the film industry’s (many and rightful) responses to the shooting was to pull its advertising of the film (trailers and TV spots) and canceling premieres; limiting the film’s exposure.  This resulted in The Dark Knight Rises to make around 86 Mil less than TDK domestically, and only 166,000,000 more internationally (and adjusting for the 65 million dollar increase in the production budget for Rises) equating to the film only surpassing The Dark Knight by 14 Million dollars much of that due to inflation and the overseas market. Yet, regardless of its lackluster success by comparison. The Dark Knight Rises is still a film worthy of social analysis and a much deserved ‘feather in the cap’ of Christopher Nolan and his team (especially Wally Pfister).



PLOT

The sacrifices made by Jim Gordon (Gary Oldman) and Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) at the end of The Dark Knight have bought Gotham City 8 years of peace and prosperity; but not without great personal cost. Bruce Wayne was scarred and crippled (both physically and emotionally) in his battles with The Joker and Harvey Two-face. Also, by taking responsibility for the latter’s crimes and death, his persona of Batman became the subject of a city wide manhunt that caused him to retire immediately. Three years prior to the start of the film, Bruce was continuing to improve Gotham through a clean energy project with Miranda Tate (Marion Cotillard) until it was revealed that the device could be turned into a weapon. Bruce decided to shut down the program (at great financial cost) and became a recluse.
            Meanwhile, Gordon was left alone to maintain the lie that he and Batman concocted in order to save the city.  Because of the lie the Gotham City passed “The Dent Act” which eradicated organized crime and warehoused over 1,000 inmates. Every year the city celebrates “Harvey Dent Day” where Gordon has to sing the praises of a man who tried to murder his family, while vilifying his friend.  The result of which caused his wife to leave Gotham with their children.
            A suspicious encounter with a jewel thief (Anne Hathaway) and the arrival of mercenary known only as Bane (Tom Hardy) leads Bruce to don the cape and cowl again.  Aided by Gordon, Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman), and a rookie beat cop (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) Bruce challenges Bane (and his army) much to the protests of Alfred (Michael Caine).
            Left to die in “the worst hell on earth” after his crushing defeat at the hands of Bane, Bruce watches as his city is burned, broken and terrorized; forcing its citizens to compromise their morality. Determined to save the city, Bruce heals and rebuilds his body, and by escaping captivity becomes “The Batman” once again ready to challenge Bane (and his compatriots) in a final battle for the soul of Gotham.



GENERAL ANALYIS

            This is the most ambitious Nolan film to date (notice this review was written before the release of Nolan’s 2014 space epic Interstellar). The scope and the grand scale of the story is remarkable. As stated in the introduction, this film is a genre bending amalgamation of pure cinematic brilliance and technical mastery. It dares the audience to throw away the conventional attitudes of filmmaking and storytelling and is bold enough to complete a story in a culture of filmmaking that is always looking for the next franchise.  To this end the film has general themes that need to be discussed before a deeper, more Sociological analysis can be given.

            Theme 1: Pain.
           
                        “I was wondering what would break first…Your spirit, or your body!”- Bane

            In doing press for the film Christopher Nolan as well as many members of the cast mentioned that the main theme in The Dark Knight Rises is Pain. Like the previous films in the franchise, the theme is embodied by the film’s antagonist(s) of Bane and Talia much in the same way The Scarecrow and Ra’s al Gul embodying the theme of Fear in Batman Begins and The Joker was the embodiment of Chaos’ Theme in The Dark Knight. However, it cannot be overlooked that while there are anthropomorphic representations of these thematic elements in each of the films villains, these themes also mark the character development of Bruce Wayne throughout the series. While on the surface, you could see that the physical confrontations between Batman and the film series’ rouges gallery is an external representation of Bruce’s internal conflict to overcome Fear, Chaos and Pain respectively. Yet, it is also from each of these conflicts that Bruce grows and is able to deal with all the tragedy he has experienced in his life.[3]
In TDKR, Bane and Talia inflict their pain on the entire city, but their focal point is Bruce Wayne/Batman.  The pain that each of them wrought is experienced in different ways by Bruce Wayne.  Bane provides Bruce with physical and psychological pain, by breaking his body and terrorizing all that he cares about. Talia provides Bruce with emotional and spiritual pain by offering him a life after Batman and with (a quite literal) knife in the back, strips that away tearing down all that he holds dear. Bruce’s triumph over pain is cinematically symbolized in his escape from “The Pit”. Not only does he have to remake his body in order to climb out of the prison, but in the process he learns to let go of the anger and pain that he has been ruled by most of his life. This epiphany allows him to be able to let Batman go by films end no longer needing the persona, and able to live a healthy complete life.

Theme 2: Completing the Story

            The other general theme that the film focuses on besides pain is the completion of Bruce Wayne’s journey and the end of the Legend of Batman.  To do that The Dark Knight Rises harkens back to what was initially set up in Batman Begins. While the reintroduction of the character’s at the beginning of the film is a result of the events of The Dark Knight, the progression and conclusion of Rises comes from the seeds planted in Begins.

“I AM the League of Shadows; here to fulfill Ra’s al Gul’s destiny!” – Bane

The first of those seeds is Bane himself being a former member of the League of Shadows trained by Ra’s al Gul, and the reveal of Ra’s daughter Talia. Their inclusion in the story represents a complete story arc over the three films. There is a lot of parallels between the stories and character arcs of Bruce, Bane and Talia because of their shared history with Ra’s al Gul. All three of them are Ra’s children. Bruce being the prodigal son and Ra’s greatest student that turns his back on him. Bane is the dutiful son that is starved of his father’s attention, while Talia is the rebellious daughter that challenges her father’s decisions. Aside from providing character parallels, the return of the League of Shadows also allows for a symmetry in storytelling, thereby setting the stage for a conclusion to Bruce’s story.

“Why do we fall Bruce? So we can learn to pick ourselves up.”-Thomas Wayne

The other seed that is planted is the thematic comparisons between “The Well” in Begins and “The Pit” in Rises. “The Well” in Batman Begins is the catalyst to Bruce’s fear of bats. It is this fear that will lead to him using it as a symbol/weapon against criminals. Yet, “The Well” also represents Bruce’s guilt and shame over his parent’s murder. It was his fear caused by his fall into “The Well” that made his parents leave the theatre which lead to their deaths. And even though Thomas Wayne’s last words to his son were “…don’t be afraid.” This lead to Bruce feeling that fear was a weakness that needed to be overcome.  He consciously buried his fear with anger. Bruce believed that if he wasn’t afraid he wouldn’t have had to be rescued from “The Well” by his father and by extension could have done something to stop his parents from being murdered. 
When Bruce is placed in “The Pit” after his defeat at the hands of Bane. Bruce believes that if he builds himself up again and if he has no fear, relying again on anger that he will prevail. A mindset that causes him to fail to climb out of “The Pit” on two separate occasions. Each time he becomes more and more demoralized and despondent almost residing himself to his fate until he gets a reeducation from a fellow inmate: 



             

            Here the inmate explains how fear can be a powerful motivator.  Before this realization, Bruce was so angry at death for taking his parents that he desired, protected and valued all life, even his own. But after Bruce’s successful climb from “The Pit” which is a (not so) subtle proxy for “The Well” he fell down as a child, Bruce’s respect for life no longer came from a place of anger, it was from the fear of losing it. In this way, when Bruce stands up after his successful climb, he is the most complete version of himself and the strongest, driven, and determined Batman, because he is no longer using his persona as a source of self-medication or as a cycle of self-destruction. In that moment, and for the rest of the film, he is the purest embodiment of Will on screen[4]. Even overshadowing his comic book counterpart.

SOCIAL ANALYSIS

            The Dark Knight Rises is rich with sociological detail to analyze.  All of Christopher Nolan’s films (especially his Dark Knight Trilogy) while not attempting to have specific social commentary about a particular issue, seem to embody the current zeitgeist.  Nolan is able to do this completely that people are able to read in and interpret the film in multiple way based upon individual experience and personal analysis. What may be obvious and glaring to one person is more hidden and subsumed. Here lies Nolan’s brilliance; being able to create something for mass consumption, while still giving patrons their own individual experience. As a Sociologist, I take the Critical, Power Conflict and Post-modern approach to almost anything that I analyze. Because of this, it was easy to follow the breadcrumbs from Marxism through the French Revolution.

Theme 3: Marxism, and the French Revolution

“Each time a city reaches the pinnacle of its decadence, we return to restore the balance.” 
-          Ra’s Al Gul
            As a Conflict Theorist, Marx identified that the inevitable social conflict was going to eventually be between “The Bourgeoisie” and the “Proletariat”. A class conflict which gives The Bourgeoisie (who own the means and social relationships of production) wealth that is not based in their own labor, but through stocks and other kinds of equity and assets.  The proletariat however only have their labor to sell. One could make the analogy between selling your body for a service job and prostitution.  Yes, the exploited labor isn’t being overtly sexualized but both industries thrive when bodies are being used in a disposable fashion.  Additionally, each person in the analogy is selling some aspect of their body and the energy exerted for compensation.
            The Conflict stated above, along with the hypocrisy of Capitalism through the internal contradiction of capital accumulation leads to the inevitable result of the exploitation of the labor market and the exploitation of consumers through the price of the product. This is because the owners (bourgeoisie) can only maximize their profits (the central theme of capitalism) by what they can completely control; namely the cost of their labor force and the price of their product.  The results of which are a series of social problems: Sweatshops, price gouging, a multitude of human rights abuses and a bifurcated class system of the haves and the have nots. The lie concocted by Gordon and Batman bought Gotham 8 years of peace but in that time the social class divisions have become so stratified (e.g. Marxism above) that the people were primed for Bane to exploit their desire for revolution. 


           
“There’s a storm coming Mr. Wayne…when it hits you’re all going to wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us.”    - Selina Kyle

            The following sequences in the film illustrate the kind of Proletarian revolution that Marx believed was inevitable. That the wealthy would be torn from their homes and put on trial.  While Marxism wasn’t a conscious theme for Team Nolan, one can see its influences especially with the French Revolutionary feel they were trying to create for Bane in his demeanor, costuming (and the costuming of his men) speeches etc. (Even Blackgate prison was a stand in for the French Bastille) regardless of the fact that it was a ruse to hide his true motives.[5]
To that end, rather than be an actual proletarian revolutionary, Bane represents (in these moments) embodies Gotham’s Symbolic Violence a Bourdieuian term meaning “the capacity to impose the means for comprehending and adapting the social world by representing economic and political power in disguised taken for granted forms…the dominated accept as legitimate their own condition of domination.”[6] Thus, many of the people accept Bane’s motivations are genuine when his true purpose is to psychologically torture Bruce Wayne (through the “poisoning” and destroying of the city) and the fulfillment of Ras’ Mission. 



Not the Occupy Movement

            Some attempts at a social analysis of this film have sited that the class conflict shown in the TDKR is a representation of The OccupyMovement. Regardless of the fact that this is simply inaccurate considering the length of time major film like this take to make (meaning that the script was written far before the occupy movement became an international social issue in 2011), the issues and the conflict are not the same.
  Firstly, The Occupy Movement’s slogan “We are the 99%.” while invoking the very Marxian idea of the Proletariats against the Bourgeoisie (represented mathematically as the 1% with this phrase), and showing solidarity between anyone who isn’t part of the “super rich”, this is not the reality that they live in. This is because privilege in this country is not only granted through wealth.
 Max Weber points out that class status is defined by Education as well as wealth, and what he calls, the three P’s(Property, Prestige, and Power). Additionally, Bourdieu mentioned several times how a person’s cultural capital: the value of a person’s knowledge skills and experiences, is conditional on the social setting and environment (i.e. what you know). As an example, knowledge of survival skills mean little in a “first world” country, but trapped alone on an island, they become invaluable. Bourdieu mentions that a person’s social capital: The value of a person’s social relationships within a particular social setting suffers the same fate.  So the idea that class division itself is only about wealth is both ignorant, naïve and wrong.  Outside of the determinants of social class itself the 99% slogan does not take into account the intersectionality of Social Class with other demographics, namely Race and Gender.
Intersectionality is a Sociological term to explain how all aspects of inequality (class, race, gender, sexuality, disability etc.) are interconnected like a spider’s web[7]. This is why the fight against structural, covert and invisible levels of inequality are so difficult to overcome; it has been integrated and embedded in our social institutions (creating income, housing, occupational discrimination) as well as normalized through our every actions and behaviors (the use of language to reinforce someone as “other” or less than such as “I’m not racist but…”, racial jokes, feminism, the word female its derivatives and synonyms). Therefore, when a slogan like “We are the 99%.” is touted, it is ignoring the very real privileges that people are afforded to them because of their skin color and their gender. Thus, when a such as slogan attempts to be all inclusive, through being both color blind and gender blind, it ignores the very unequal realities of women and people of color.

"The point, was that Batman could be anybody." -Bruce Wayne.

Secondly, the conflict between Bane and the police is not fully formed to be a parallel to the Occupy movement, with Bane being on the people, and the police the side of order (and the super-rich). One review I read went so far to say that this was illustrated by the fact that the police were led by one of Gotham’s super rich (i.e. Bruce Wayne/Batman).  However, there are several contradictions to this assessment.  During the scene of the heist at the stock exchange, the dialogue between the police and a stock trader outlines the police as “of the people.” Yet, if this is the case, it is contradicted by Bane saying that he is giving Gotham to the people (wouldn’t he also give it freely to the police as well…which he doesn’t), and during the final confrontation between Bane and his army and Batman and the police in the climax. By this assessment, “the people” rise up to take their city back from Bane solidifying its own contradiction
Also, I could make the opposite assessment by saying that once Bruce Wayne lost his money, it legitimated that he could lead the people of Gotham in taking back their city. However, I am unwilling to put too much stock in this idea either because the people of Gotham do not realize Bruce Wayne and Batman are the same person by the end of the film. Since they don’t know that they are the same person, Bruce Wayne is still seen as part of “the 1%” whereas Batman remains a symbol of the people (see the above quote) which was Bruce’s whole goal of the Batman persona to begin with. Thus, it is a false analysis to say that this film has parallels to the Occupy movement because A) Bane does not represent the people, Batman does, and B) Bane whole purpose (as described above) was not about liberation, it was about control and destruction.

Feminism and Gender Bending
            One of the most legitimate and resounding criticisms I have had through this sociological review of the films of Christopher Nolan has been his portrayal of women.  His films, up up to this point, have featured paper thin two dimensional female characters that have been there only for the plot or to advance the story of the (usually white) male protagonist. None of his prior films pass the Bechdel test, and many of the female characters die or are killed fulfilling the not only the damsel in distress trope (e.g. Rachel in Batman Begins) but the women in refrigerators trope as well (e.g. Rachel in The Dark Knight).  In The Dark Knight Rises, it seems that Nolan has finally turned a corner.  Not only does he have two major female characters as part of the main cast (Anne Hathaway’s Selina and Marion Cotillard’s Miranda), both of which have detailed character arcs and rich three dimensional backstories; but Nolan also includes important secondary character in Jen (Juno Temple) who’s presence allows the film to pass the aforementioned Bechdel Test. In addition to that, it was nice to see female police officers fighting Bane’s army in the final battle.
            The use of Bane’s backstory in the film also gave Nolan an opportunity for gender bending.  During the second act sequence when Bruce is recovering in “The Pit” he hears the story of a child who was born in the prison and escapes. Even though we see this sequence play out in front of us, because Nolan kept a lot of gender identifiers neutral, the audience assumes, as Bruce does, that it was Bane that made the climb out. When it is revealed that the child was Ra’s daughter Talia (Marion Cotillard), Nolan is commenting on how gendered expectations can be easily manipulated in stories without other, culturally specific gender identifiers (albeit subtly). It might be a stretch, but one could also suppose that this gender bending is a commentary on the expectations of masculinity and preying upon devaluing of women in our culture.


 In many action films, especially in the superhero genre, women are just starting to be seen on (semi) equal footing. I still argue, however; that women being seen on equal terms with men in popular culture still comes at the cost of women retaining their sex appeal. While this is still true in Rises, Nolan is able to use the audience gendered expectations against them. The audience assumes that it is Bane who climbs out of the prison, not only because that is what they are told through the story, but because it is something that they have seen in film 100 times over: a young white male finding the courage to overcome adversity. It is hard to say, (though it could be inferred) if Nolan was preying upon the weak female stereotype. If he wasn’t directly alluding to it, the stereotypical assumption that women are too weak to make such a climb certainly helped with his misdirection, setting up the twist reveal at the end. Also, we do see a number of men try and fail to climb out of “The Pit” (Bruce Wayne even attempting twice before success), adding fuel to the normalized stereotype.



CHARACTERS

            Bruce 

            The Dark Knight Trilogy is the story about Bruce Wayne.  The Dark Knight Rises is how his story ends.  As mentioned above, the journey of Bruce Wayne is how he learns to deal with the loss of his parents and the emptiness that it caused.  Starting with Batman Begins, In order to make a difference in his city, one that makes sure his parent’s death was not in vain, he adopts the persona of Batman as a symbol to inspire people to be better, that the people of Gotham are good decent people, just misguided by the criminals and the corrupt.  However, in the also uses that persona as therapy (to express his anger and suppress his fear) which fast becomes an addiction as to Rachel’s point The Dark Knight.
When the audience catches up with Bruce at the beginning of Rises, not only is he physically the shell of the man he once was, his 8 year “cold turkey” withdrawal from his Batman addiction coupled with a fresh failure of trying to help the city as Bruce Wayne has left him in fragile psychological state.  Christian Bale (who gives his best performance here as the character) plays with these aspects, including hints at possible mental illness, through sporadic mid-sentence accent and inflection changes in his voice, and mannerisms that suggest dis-associative disorder.  Yet, when the chance arises for Bruce to be Batman again, like an alcoholic falling off the wagon (because the withdrawal symptoms are so bad) Bruce jumps at the chance.   
            One of the criticisms of TDKR, especially concerning Bruce Wayne, is that he has to build himself back into Batman twice in the film, seeming redundant.  I contest that he is not fully “Batman” in the film until he climbs out of “The Pit”; learning to embrace fear and life again. Alfred says as much to Bruce on two separate occasions in the film. First when he attempts to go out as Batman for the first time:

Alfred: “You can strap up your leg, and put your mask back on; but that doesn’t make you what
                were.”

And then immediately when Bruce returns

Bruce: “You thought I didn’t have it in me.”
Alfred: “You don’t. You lead the cops on a merry chase with a load of new toys from Fox.”

 Even before Bruce meets Bane, whenever Bruce is fighting the League of Shadows, Bale includes subtle signs of effort and physical straining tin his performance that wasn’t there in the previous films. Additionally, when he does meet Bane the depths of just how lost he is begins to sink in as he can do Nothing to injure or hinder Bane. 



Bane was the mechanism by which Bruce was removed from the state of False Consciousness about his health and abilities that the armor and the weaponry secured. It was only when he was physically and spiritually broken, stripped away of all his delusions of grandeur, and his death wish could he hope to build himself up back into the man that he was; even better than before.[8]

“You will never learn.” – Ra’s al Gul  

            One of the most consistent character traits of Nolan’s Bruce Wayne is he constantly underestimates his opponents. He believes that he can intimidate and bully the Scarecrow in Begins, he is unable to assess The Joker as a dangerous threat at the start of The Dark Knight and he believes that Bane is just a mercenary who can be beaten if he just fights hard enough at the beginning of Rises.  While I understand this is more realistic, this particular character trait leads him to actions or inactions that put him and or others in danger. This is one aspect of Bruce’s character that I wish was more influenced by the comics: A Batman so cynical and jaded that he prepares for every eventual outcome, even betrayal.
            Regarding the notion of betrayal, another departure from the comics is that Nolan’s Bruce Wayne is always looking for the best in people.  This goodness is rewarded (mostly) with betrayal. Selina betrays him to Bane (to stop them trying to kill her) and he is betrayed by Miranda once she reveals she is Talia. Nevertheless both female characters are positioned in the film as potential romantic partners for Bruce. Yet, out of the two Bruce’s relationship with Selina is more genuine.  They flirt and have a natural chemistry both in and out of costume. Whereas Miranda (we find out later) is just preying upon him, seducing him and taking away his edge as he goes to meet Bane. 
It is important to note that while the inclusion of Selina Kyle in this film was almost an afterthought (Nolan needed convincing from his brother Jonathan) she is integral in both getting Bruce out of his state of limbo at the beginning of the film; And, more importantly giving Bruce a life beyond Batman and Gotham. She represents his first real adult relationship, and his perfect compliment.


 
Selina


            Selina Kyle in The Dark Knight Rises is Nolan’s representation of feminism.  She has agency in both her identity and sexuality and she is one of if not the first three dimensional female character in a Nolan film that is a non-archetype/trope.  What is interesting is the way Selina plays off the gendered expectations that others have using her gender master status[9] as a way to manipulate the situation and get what she wants.  In several instances in the film she uses her sexuality to disarm her prey (such as Congressman Gilly) or uses frightened female routine to avoid suspicion. One of the best examples of this is the “Catwoman” reveal at the beginning of the film. When Bruce Wayne finds her, he startles her by shooting an arrow by her head. She attempts to act frightened hoping that will allow her true intensions to be masked.  Bruce, being the detective that he is, doesn’t buy it and Selina has to drop the act.  And with a simple “Oops.” Selina true nature is revealed, and she captures the attention of both Bruce and the audience.  


            Unfortunately, there is one aspect of Selina’s story that is left unresolved in the film, and that is her relationship with Jen (Juno Temple). I assume this is a call back to the relationship that Selina has with Holly in Batman: Year One.  In the comics, this relationship was forged out of necessity.  Selina and Holly (again Jen in the film) were prostitutes working under the same sleazy pimp which causes her to have her first run in with Bruce Wayne (undercover as a street thug at the time). There are hints at this prostitute backstory in the way that Jen would lure guys into their apartment and then steal from them.

Once you’ve done what you’ve had to, they will never let you do what you want to.” Selina

   However, as the film builds to its climax we do not see Selina and Jen together once Bruce returns to Gotham.  It seems like that relationship is dropped for Selina’s relationship with Bruce.  As a Sociologist that studies gender and sexuality, I am disappointed in Nolan for not having some type of resolution to this relationship.  It would have been nice to see Jen be the one to lead the people out of the tunnel that Selina unblocked with the Batpod; then we could get a satisfying character moment between them. Instead the only female/female friendship in the entire trilogy is cast aside to focus on the heterosexual romantic love interest.  I do not think this was the intent or even a conscious choice on the part of the filmmakers, but it is a constant occurrence in films such as these; a representation of our cultural hetero-normativity denying what Adrianne Rich calls “The Lesbian Existence”[10]

Bane 


                                    “No one cared who I was until I put on the mask.” Bane

            When Bane was first announced as the main antagonist for The Dark Knight Rises I was a bit skeptical.  I did not think he was a terribly fleshed out character in the comics (at the time I had yet to read Gail Simone’s take on Bane in Secret Six) and I only knew him as the person who broke Bruce Wayne’s back and his awful portrayal in Batman and Robin. Yet, the more I heard about Bane’s role in the film, and the more I read of him in the comics to prepare, I realized that there was no other choice. I became convinced once Tom Hardy was cast and I heard that the voice that he was crafting for Bane was going to be Eastern European with a hint of Irish gypsy.  His Bane voice was so good, it became quite popular among fans.
            As I mention in a previous post, a lot of Batman’s villains (in the comics and in Nolan’s trilogy) are reflections of himself. Bane in TDKR represents what Bruce would have become if he would have stayed with Ra’s. His dedication and humanity would have been warped to serve extreme ecological terrorism.  Bane is charismatic, brutal and dedicated. He inspires loyalty in his subjects and commands respect. This is illustrated in the opening “Prologue”. 




            It needs to be mentioned that in the film, Bane is a person with a disability; he suffers from chronic pain. The drug venom in the comics is replaced with a narcotic gas that numbs him to the pain.  This allows Bane to go past normal human body limits and build his body into a devastating weapon because he has no sense of pain to stop him.  Unfortunately here, Nolan again falls into the disability film trope of the villain having a physical disability as a short hand to show that he is also evil ( as he did with The Joker in The Dark Knight). But even this is turned on its head by the films end. Allowing Bane to be humanized seeing that he is more like Anakin Skywalker (Darth Vader) than just surface comparisons.

Talia

I never thought that we would be able to see Talia al Gul on screen.  When Marion Cotillard was cast, it was the worst kept secret that she was Talia.  However, the film is so long, and so much happens, that you almost forget about it until her reveal. As with her father’s deception using the alias “Ducard” in Batman Begins, everything that Talia does as Maranda is in the service of her overall mission. This is where viewing the film multiple times allows the viewer to see all of the little sabotages that Talia causes as Maranda:
1)      Gaining the trust of Alfred and Lucius in order to prey on Bruce
2)      She uses her relationship with Bruce to gain access to Wayne Enterprises by inflating the threat of John Dagget
3)       She uses her position at Wayne Enterprises to gain access to the clean energy project that she can turn into a bomb
4)      Exploits Bruce’s feelings of loss and pain over Rachel and Alfred
5)      Sleeps with Bruce and gives him dreams of a happy future right before confronting Bane to take his edge off
6)      Joins Gordon’s resistance to gain intel and sabotage all their efforts
                            She tells Bane where to find the Special Forces
                            She marks the wrong truck that is supposed to have the bomb
                            She has Gordon and their men ambushed

All of this was done as Talia was masquerading as Maranda.  But when Talia finally reveals herself. She is powerful, strong, capable and scary.  She is the only one in the entire trilogy to make Bruce beg; because he realized that she had won, her deception was near perfect. If Bane is Anakin, she is the Emperor. The menace that is in the shadows waiting for the right moment to strike.



Gordon

            Gordon, like Bruce, is emotionally scarred by the events of The Dark Knight. Keeping up the lie about Harvey Dent for the sake of Gotham has caused him the loss of his family.[11] Like so many of our US soldier he is a war hero that does not know how to adjust to peace time/civilian life.  In TDKR, Gordon does share a lot of similarities with vets of our current western conflict.  Not only is he emotionally damaged by his time at war and his inability to adjust causes him to jump right back into the fray getting himself hurt in the process. Then, later, he becomes the defacto General in the War against Bane.  It is unfortunate that, like Bruce, Gordon couldn’t let go of all that he’d seen and done. I would have liked to see Gordon reunited with his family at the end.


Blake

            In my review of Nolan’s The Prestige I mentioned that one of Nolan’s approaches to filmmaking is treating it like a three part magic trick. In John Blake he pulls off one of the greatest tricks he has ever attempted. While we are getting the end of Bruce Wayne’s story, we are also getting the origin story for John Blake. That origin is a composite of most of the characters that have donned the persona of “Robin” in the comics Aside from Stephanie Brown (Robin IV) and Carrie Kelly (Robin VI):
1)      John’s backstory is pulled directly from Jason Todd (Robin II)
2)      He deduces Batman’s identity as Bruce Wayne like Tim Drake (Robin III)
3)      He is a “hot head” like Damien Wayne (Robin V)
4)      He is a cop and he takes up the mantel of Batman like Dick Grayson (Robin I)

At the end of the film when the assessor asks for his legal name, I was half expecting to hear one of the names listed above, however when he said “Robin” that solidified that he was helping Batman throughout the film, like a sidekick, and that he was going to be Bruce’s successor.



PRODUCTION



 Source Material

As with The Dark Knight, Rises has a lot of different source material it draws upon from both the comics and from literature:

The Return of Batman after suffering a tragedy and retirement
“Boy, you’re in for a show tonight Son!”
The “Magic Knee Brace” (though in the comic it’s an arm brace)
Bruce faking his own death.

The character of Bane
Bane knowing who Batman is
Bane breaking Batman/Bruce Wayne’s back
Bruce Wayne’s recovery
Batman defeating Bane in Combat (though in the comic it is Jean Paul Valley)

The Destruction of Gotham (Though in the Comics it was an Earthquake)
The Destruction of the Bridges
“The people of Gotham we have not abandoned you.”
The Tagging of the Bat Symbol as street graffiti
Bruce Wayne leaving Gotham

The French revolutionary feel
Bane’s coat
Batman’s Martyrdom
Gordon’s speech at Bruce’s grave


Music

The Score for this film is the greatest in the trilogy.  The way that Zimmer put this soundtrack together is nothing short of brilliance. In the beginning of the film, Zimmers music is haunting, like Bruce, a shadow of the score from the previous films.  Then as the story progresses Zimmer cranks up the intensity. So much, by the time the score swells in the last sequence and you see Bruce in the café, tears are streaming down your face!  Here is both a sample of the music (which you should buy) and a video about the making of it.






Cinematography

This was the swan song of Wally Pfister and Christopher Nolan’s collaboration, and it is the most beautiful film to date. Sweeping breathless cityscapes to intimate close-ups Pfister gives us everything. With a total of 72 min of the film shot in IMAX Pfister took what he leaned on The Dark Knight and Inception and made this film even better.  They had better rigs for the IMAX cameras, and they found a way to dampen some of its noise.  The rest of the film was shot on 35mm and 75mm film to make sure that when they made a photochemical (non-digital) transfer of the film that the home video viewing experience is as crystal and clear as the film in the theaters. While I did not particularly like Pfister’s directorial debut, I would like to see him direct again, or at the very least collaborate with Nolan on a future project once Interstellar is complete.

Direction
            The Dark Knight Rises is Nolan’s greatest work to date. It is also an illustration of how Nolan masterfully weaves together large scale scope, and epic visuals with human drama. The immensity of TDKR only works if you are invested in the story of Bruce Wayne. Once Nolan has that the scope and scale that he creates is there to just emphasis and elevate the story itself.  He is Brilliant. That is all.

CONCLUSION
            This is my favorite Nolan Film to date. It is hard to put into words how this film makes me feel every time I see it.  It is as close to a religious experience as I believe I will ever get (who knows we will see what happens when I see Interstellar). This film means more to me than the others in the trilogy because it has an ending.  While many Batman fans wanted an out. Meaning they wanted the end of the story that wasn’t an end, desiring instead to have Batman’s mission be everlasting.  Nolan never set out to tell that story, and there were hints at it from the very beginning of the trilogy.  I wanted an ending, I wanted the three act structure to be complete. When stories continue, (going on sometimes for 10 years) they lose their value. By ending the story in a (very) satisfying way, Nolan not only protects his vision of Batman, (From the Studio and Zack Snyder) but gives us a complete understanding of Bruce Wayne and Batman that can never be repeated.  This is the end to my definitive Batman on Film.  I may have to wade through a lot of crap in the future (looks like a tons worth).  But this series of films, and The Dark Knight Rises in particular will always show me that Batman has been given his due.




[1] It was quite clear, based upon the negative fan reaction to the aforementioned 8 year gap between TDK and Rises that many fans did not expect nor want Batman’s story to end because Batman’s story in the comics; is endless. However, this is more so a function of the comics industry’s need to constantly sell more monthly comic books rather than Bruce’s mission being completely without end. 
[2] I too was in a midnight screening of the film. I will cover this as well as my personal reactions to the tragedy and the entire Batman mythos in a later post covering the entire trilogy.
[3]  I mentioned in my review of Batman Begins that Bruce uses the persona of Batman as a coping mechanism to deal with the loss of his parents and to control and focus his Fear. In The Dark Knight Bruce learns that he has to be humble and altruistically sacrifice himself and his reputation, to eliminate Chaos. By The Dark Knight Rises the questions are raised as to how healthy Batman has become for Bruce Wayne’s psyche, and how long can a person hold onto, and let Pain rule his life?
[4] In that moment, Bruce is reborn. This is a direct reference to “The Lazarus Pit” in the comics which allowed Ra’s al Gul to heal injuries and reach immortality. Here, being able to climb out of “The Pit” has similarly rejuvenated Bruce.
[5] If Bane really wanted to revolutionize Gotham by eliminating Capitalism, he would have to come up with a successor system to it; such as David Schweickart’s “Economic Democracy”
[7] There are many names for this idea. My favorite is from Patricia Hill Collins who calls this “The Matrix of Domination”.
[8] This too is also a reference in the comics to rebirth of a character as they rise from “The Lazarus Pit.”, a pool with unknown chemicals that has allowed Ra’s (and a few others) to cheat death.  The Rebirth of Batman, in such a way in the film, is a nice Easter egg for fans.


[9][9] Master status: The collection of certain social statuses whose assumptions, above all other statuses, affects how other individuals react to you and interact with you.  Master status includes: Age Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexuality, Disability
[10] The Lesbian Existence is the idea that women can gain more power, authority and capital (in all its forms) through their relationships with other women. However, Rich states that this power is denied to women through “compulsory heterosexuality” which, in part, teaches women to value their relationships with men over their relationships with women.  This is one reason why women are socialized to hate other women, because they see other women as competition for male attention.
[11] As a side note: How do you know Gotham is the worst city in the world? Those that try to escape it move to Cleveland!!! 

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Gone Girl Review


INTRODUCTION

        David Fincher's Gone Girl  is bloated, horribly paced shell of the mystery/thriller genre that sympathizes with the so called "plight" of the white heterosexual male.  This is the worst film I have seen in 2014, and it is also the worst time I have had at the movies this year, leaving me both agitated and depressed. This film was so bad that I decided to write this review as a form of catharsis, instead of finishing my review of The Dark Knight Rises.

PLOT

       Nick Dunne (Ben Affleck) comes home to signs of a struggle and his wife (Rosamund Pike) missing. While Nick begins searching for his wife with the aid of his small Missouri town, the evidence in the police's investigation begins to implicate Nick. As the evidence begins to mount, and the media picking his life apart, Nick tries to make sense out of the perplexing cryptic clues and stalking strangers that were left in the wake of his wife's disappearance, determined to find the truth.

GENERAL ANALYSIS 

        First, clocking in at 149 min (2hrs 29min), this film is far too long.  It is difficult for a perfect film to  maintain audience attention for that long let alone one filled with so many flaws (like this one).  The reason for this length is that this is two films masquerading as one.  The first film (the first 90min) is a pretty good thriller; keeping the audience in the dark as to character motivations and raising doubt as to the  likelihood of Nick's guilt or innocence.  In the second film (the remaining 90min) we are given answers, which seems far less satisfying than the questions.
         The end of the first film, is a shocking reveal of Hitchcockian proportions. The twist was captivating and riveting (at least while you were watching it for the first time) that left me at the edge of my seat.  This is where most thrillers end, leaving the audience shocked and amazed; this film unfortunately keeps going.  Coming off such a big reveal, leaving the audience in such a state of shell shock, the rest of the film quickly deflates into hammy character tropes (woman scorned) and unbelievable plot devices (learning how to frame someone by watching police procedurals)  that quickly loses the audience's interests,  while trying to cash in on (their rapidly depleting) goodwill and over investment.

Spoilers ahead

           The second major problem with this film is the writing.  Written for the screen by the book's author Gillian Flynn there are many problematic tropes, tonal shifts and toying with the audience that left me angry.  I can understand and appreciate an author wanting to maintain creative control over their content and characters as their story(ies) are adapted across different mediums of entertainment. However, since I have not read the book I cannot say if it was changing the story to fit the screen that caused the film to falter and fail for me, or if it was adhering too close to the source material. Either way, the character motivations and development are difficult to digest. This all culminates in the climax of the film that leaves the audience empty and depressed.
            The biggest problems of the writing is the character of Amy Dunne (Rosamund  Pike). Her initial motivations for framing Nick are confusing and convoluted.  While to some this may seem like part and parcel of the thriller genre, it comes off as unclear, lacking focus. It seems that Amy's reasons throughout the film seem to change with the wind, the film by the end, at last settles on the very tired and retreaded stereotype that she is crazy.

SOCIAL ANALYSIS

                                      "Hell Hath No Fury like a Woman Scorned"

            This film is a patriarchal fantasy, supporting the Men's Rights Movement; reiterating their anti-feminist doctrine that as women have gained more power in social institutions and become empowered as a result, men have been systematically emasculated (the masculine image that Nick seems to represent in the film). Essentially, this film serves as a cautionary tale to men regarding the "inherent dangers" of  female equality and justice. The film subtly frames Amy's psychosis as the result of her power both in and out of her relationship with Nick. Additionally reinforcing the sexist stereotype that all women, especially wives, are jealous manipulative, conniving gold-diggers; Amy manipulates Nick in their relationship at every turn. This is illustrated by the reveal of Amy's set up of Nick for her disappearance. With Nick's emasculation on full display, the film prompts men to desire more control and command in the relationship by controlling women....which is usually achieved through violence. This violence is shown (symbolically) in the film when Amy is falling on hard times (losing money and being imprisoned by a former boyfriend (Neil Patrick Harris)).Through these sequences the audience is urged by the score, lighting, and cinematography, to revel in her fear; knowing that all that she will endure (physical or psychological) she will have "deserved it". Thus through the symbolic violence that she experiences, the audience is manipulated to want to see her hurt and punished...as a lot of men want to see women hurt and punished as a way to regain their "lost" masculinity.
             Yet, not only does this film vilify women (at least those that don't follow binary gender norms), thereby justifying their own sexual assault, it also sympathizes with the white heterosexual male.  Nick is the Men's Right's Movement's image of the "post-feminist" male that has been belittled and ignored causing men to lose their power. Therefore, his affair with one of his creative writing students is a result of wanting to gain some of that power back, and the audience is supposed to forgive this act as a minor indiscretion because he takes "minor" ownership of it ( but does not care about his girlfriend's feelings). This is playing off of the biologically deterministic stereotype that "men need sex, and it is in their nature to philander".  As mentioned, since Nick has no power , the only thing that he can do to prove that he is still a man is to sacrifice himself and his happiness for his unborn child.  Through that act he then regains his masculinity.
              What troubles me more than the anti-feminist, pro-white dude message that this film touts, is the film's success and what that reflects about our culture.  This film is very popular. With a 88% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a lot of positive critical buzz this film is warmly embraced.  I find this troubling, mainly because of the film's indictment of both marriage, feminism and women in general. Is the film's critical buzz due to the covert and invisible and visible forms of misogyny that have been embedded in our culture for the last 50 years? If so, will we see even more films being more openly misogynistic (like pornography) in the future? It bothers me to no end not only that these sexist stereotypes are still present in 2014, but that they are being repackaged and presented to see white heterosexual men as the victim.  If this continues male privilege will remain completely invisible and any 3 dimensional strong female characters will be seen as nothing more than angry manipulative arrogant bitches and whores.  This is the tide that we need to fight against, we can not have this wave gain ANY momentum.

CONCLUSION

               I respect David Fincher and his (previous) work. Which is why I am hurt and confused that he would direct a film such as this.  I hope this is not one of those issues where, due to social and political ideologies, I have to stop consuming the content that Fincher produces (as I have done with restaurants). I hope it was an oversight and a mistake on his part. Please do not see this film.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

The Films of Christopher Nolan: Inception







INTRODUCTION

The 7th film in my comprehensive analysis of The Films of Christopher Nolan is the mind bending Inception  Nolan’s first original work since his first film Following, Inception took over 8 years to write. Initially conceived as a smaller film, Nolan soon realized that if he was going to tell a story about the intricacies of the mind, and the ability to navigate it, that he needed a much wider canvas (and budget) on which to paint.  From all accounts (the producers and the director himself) Inception, as a potential film, was always in the background, a labor of love that Nolan would work on during or in between other projects.  When The Dark Knight reached the box office record of 1 billion dollars, Warner Bros. (the studio that has been Nolan’s most frequent studio collaborator) gave Nolan’s Inception, considered by them to be his “passion project”, a green light as a reward/thank you. With multiple academy award nominations (including best original screenplay for Nolan) and a win for Wally Pfister’s cinematography, this “gamble” paid off for the studio both critically (86 % on Rotten Tomatoes) and commercially bringing in a whopping $825,532,764 at the end of its box office run.      



PLOT

            To stop a monopolistic energy company, a rival competitor (Ken Wantanabe) hires Dominic Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio), a thief specializing in an esoteric form of psychic espionage to plant an idea into the C.E.O’s (Cillian Murphy) mind in order to break up his company. Tempted by the chance to return home after the death of his wife (Marion Cotillard) Cobb assembles a team that includes: A point man (Joseph Gordon Levitt), a forger (Tom Hardy), an architect (Ellen Page), and a chemist (Dileep Rao) for their most difficult job…Inception.

SOCIAL ANALYSIS

                                    “What is the most consistent parasite? ...an idea.” – Cobb

            Inception is a rich complex film with as many layers of social and psychological analysis as there are layers of the dream state.  While the film often tends to identify itself as purely psychological, blurring the lines between wakefulness and dreaming, examining how we process loss and pain through dreaming (a form of dream therapy), and solidifying the importance of belief.  Looking at the film sociologically though, we can see a number of themes that touch on the social constructionism, the presentation of self, Socialization, and an allegory to filmmaking. 

                                    “What is real is real in its consequences.”- W.I. Thomas


Theme I: Social Constructionism

            Social constructionism has its origins in both the sociological theoretical perspective of Symbolic Interactionism and the earlier philosophical idea of Pragmatism. The basic idea of Pragmatism is that what individuals consider to be reality does not exist in any concrete space. Rather, reality is actively created by those who live within it.  Symbolic Interactionism focuses on the individual within society having the ability to interpret reality through the use of symbols. Symbols are objects in social reality, both tangible and intangible, that have expressed social meaning (Blumer 1969)[1]. These symbols are created and maintained through social interactions and observations. Each different social setting or situation carries with it its own set of rules and norms (and therefore a different reality) causing a type of “shock” as the individual moves from one situation to another.
For Berger and Luckman (1966)[2], the collective understanding and adherence to particular language, rituals, belief systems, norms, and values shape the reality of both the individual and the group. Therefore, the individual living within society is an active participant in the development of both the collective consciousness of a group of people, and her/his own perception of the world. This is because as we try to interpret and understand the rules and norms of reality by interacting and observing other people, by that very same action we are creating reality. This is because our actions in society are observed and analyzed by others for their own understanding. To them, our actions become social messages to regulate their own behavior.  This is what Berger and Luckmann (1966) allude to when they identify “society as objective [and] subjective reality” (p. 47-183).  

Berger and Luckmann (1966) illustrate this in the following passage:

The reality of everyday life further presents itself to me as an intersubjective world, a world I share with others. This intersubjectivity sharply differentiates everyday life from other realities of which I am conscious. I am alone in the world of my dreams, but I know that the world of everyday life is as real to others as it is to myself. Indeed, I cannot exist in everyday life without continually interacting and communicating with others. I know that my natural attitude to this world corresponds to the natural attitude of others…Most importantly, I know there is ongoing correspondence between my meanings and their meanings in this world, that we share a common sense about reality…The reality of everyday life is often taken for granted as reality…It is simply there…I know that it is real.  While I am capable of engaging in doubt about its reality, I am obliged to suspend such doubt as I routinely exist in everyday life. (p.23)

            In the film, Cobb echoes these sentiments when he explains the concept of shared dreaming; that in the dream a person’s mind, quite efficiently, creates the world of the dream while perceiving it at the same time. This is not unlike the way that we exist within social reality. By living in society we interpret meaningful symbols but then our actions are interpreted by others to help them construct their own reality.  Thus, we are creating (for others) and perceiving ( for ourselves) reality much in the same way we do in our dreams; though in our dreams, we do not experience the world in a linear fashion.




This scene is interesting because not only does it succinctly explain the way we socially construct reality, but it suggests that this process can be interrupted or manipulated.  In the film, when a person is in the dream state, they are vulnerable to manipulation and their knowledge and secrets can be stolen through a process called extraction. Or, more nefariously, an idea can be implanted in their head through inception.  In social reality, the behaviors of extraction and inception are performed through the process of Socialization, the clearest examples of which come from media advertising and the manufacturing of desire.   

Theme II: Socialization is Inception.

            Socialization is the process of social learning that individuals have to go through staring in childhood and ending at a person’s death.  This is a life-long process because we do not have the intellectual capacity when we are children to fully understand all of the roles and responsibilities that we will take on as an adult. Therefore, information and learning is broken up into more manageable/digestible pieces, segmented and separated by elaborate “rites of passage” administered through complex agents of socialization.[3] It is this process, and these agents, that shape how we see the world. Therefore our perception of the world, and our interactions within it can be manipulated.
            One of the best examples of such manipulation is through advertising.  It is the goal of advertising to manufacture desire for a particular product or service.  This advertising is done in a variety of different ways: through entertainment (making a product feel exciting and a gateway to a “good time”), through the appeal to the past (usually using nostalgic images and music to appeal to a person’s childhood/youth) or by using sex (which is predominantly done by the sexualizing and dismembering of women’s bodies).  This has become so much a part of our culture that a lot of it has an unconscious effect.  Yet, this unconscious effect does not just apply to our desire for goods and services. Jean Kilbourne (1999)[4] identifies that when ads are created they do more than just sell products; they sell values and ideals about what is acceptable and normal in our society.  Thus, through a catchy jingle, or a childhood memory, these subtle ideas about what is sexy, acceptable human value, race and ethnicity, masculinity and femininity are “inceptioned” into us; meanwhile allowing us to think that our perception of the world (and how we think about it) are solely our own.


  




Theme III: The Presentation of Self.

“When an individual enters into the presence of others, they commonly seek to acquire   information about him or to bring into play information about him already possessed.” Goffman 1959: 1)[5]

The presentation of self is theory of self-construction.  Erving Goffman in his doctoral dissertation, postulated that if we observe and interact to make sense out of the world (see above) at some point we realize that others are doing the exact same thing and looking at us for that information.  Therefore, according to Goffman (1959), we attempt to control how other people see us, to maintain a particular impression about how we are perceived in the minds of our onlookers; whom Goffman (1959) calls our “audience” (p.17).
We constantly perform for numerous audience members for each specific impression we have. Whether it be at home with your family, out with your friends, or at work, this performance is always on. In these different spaces we use different language, different mannerisms we engage in conversations about different things, in hopes to be seen a particular way by our different audiences.  This process can be so powerful that the performer can “be taken in by his own act; he can be sincerely convinced he can be sincerely convinced that the impressions of reality that he stages is the real reality” (Goffman 1959: 17).  However, even those of us who are not taken in by our own performance understand that we don’t perform all of our impressions at once, there are certain settings for a performance what Goffman (1959) calls stages/regions.
These stages/regions are typically divided into a binary: the front stage/region and the back stage/region.  The front stage is given to the name where the performance takes place, and the back stage is given to the area where the performance is dropped and worked on (Goffman 1959: 107). Goffman also looks at the way that social settings are constructed and notices that a majority of the social world we live in is divided into frontages and back stages.  We even do this psychologically, we give a performance in a particular social setting, but when we leave that setting, or we are not in front of that audience, our performance (for that particular impression) is dropped. It is this constant raising and dropping of performances that may highlight weakness in our own impressions. For that, Goffman (1959) says we need teamwork and tact.
  Teamwork is “any set of individuals who co-operate in staging a single routine” (Goffman 1959: 79).  An example of which could be a teacher and her/his students creating and maintaining an impression of a classroom to any outside observer (whom would become their audience).  Tact is a set of behaviors that are employed by team members, or sympathetic audience members, when an impression begins to fail. Whether this is directly helping to smooth over cracks in a person’s impression (as a team member might), or to ignoring those cracks when they occur, tact is a number of behaviors an audience member might use to maintain the overall impression structure. Essentially, tact is used to protect a person’s impression, because if one person’s impression fails, that puts all of the impressions in jeopardy. 
The presentation of self in Inception are the projections. Projections in the film are images of people or objects in the dream that are “projected” by the sleeper’s subconscious. This also includes the way each dreamer looks.  The way each person on the team looks in the dream is a representation of how they see themselves or how they want to be seen. Thus through this dream “projection” they are trying to maintain a particular impression. If you look closely, each character has subtle differences in their appearance that says something about self-construction. Most commonly these differences are in clothing and hairstyle; they tend to be more groomed with more expensive clothes this gets into what Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu calls “taste”[6] (which can be used to determine social class positions).  It seems however that in order to get at the socially constructed self of the characters in the film, you need to look at their totems.
A totem (in the film) acts as an anchor allowing the dream sharer to know when they are in reality and when they are dreaming. It is a specific object that is unique to each person that has a special property which only that person knows about. The way that the totem acts and/or feels in the dream and in reality allow the dreamer to tell the difference.

Totems we see in the film and what they mean:


                                                            Dream                                                Reality
Cobb: Wedding Ring             Wearing it on his left hand                 Not wearing it
Mal:   Top                               Spinning will never stop                     Will stop naturally
Arthur: Weighted Die           Weighted side not down                    Weighted side down
Ariadne: Golden Bishop        Will not fall correctly                          Fall on weighted side
Eames: Poker chip                  Multiplies when rubbed together        Nothing happens


In regards to the presentation of self, I find it very interesting that Cobb’s totem is his wedding ring and he only wears it in the dream. Is it because he can only see the projection of Mal in the dream, and therefore the only place he still feels married? Cobb does say to Ariadne that “in his dreams they are still together”. I wonder (in the context of the story) if this started after Mal’s death or if this was his totem before (because in the film he mostly uses Mal’s). Did he use the totem in the same way to distinguish reality before? This could also just be a clever way for the film makers to allow the audience to keep track of whether or not they are seeing a dream.
Mal is the other great example of the presentation of self. In the film, we never see the real Mal. She is either seen in flashbacks where she is depicted as mentally ill due to Cobb’s successful inception, or she is portrayed as Cobb’s projection of her.  Therefore, we are never given a clear image of who Mal was, all we get is Cobb’s poor facsimile of her, and how he saw her through what he could glean off of her own impression management.

I can’t imagine you with all of your complexity, with all your perfection and imperfection. Look at you. You’re just a shade, a shade of my real wife. I am sorry, it’s just not good enough.”- Cobb

While I find this quote to be beautifully written and hauntingly romantic. I also think this allowed Nolan to cop out a little bit.
 In so many of Nolan’s films haven’t been a showcase for women. Many of his stories (as brilliant as they are) are about white dudes with angst. Angst that they have to solve by the end of the film. The one thing that I can say about Inception is that Nolan gave himself a creative and plausible way of dodging gender equality (that does not even pass the Bachdel test) by making Mal’s shallow one-dimensional “fem fatale” portrayal an important plot point. Additionally, the character of Ariadne is very important to the team, she is the architect of the dream space that is better than Cobb, and she acts as Cobb’s confidant. She is the eyes through which we get to know Cobb.  However, it does irk me a bit that we never see her build any of the dreamscapes we see later in the film, or that the majority of the time she is having things explained to her, rather than doing something.


Theme IV: Allegory to Filmmaking

             Christopher Nolan loves film. Even though his formal training is in literature, he has talked at great length about the power of film to transform, allowing for experimental storytelling and an immersive audience experience. It makes sense then that Inception, one of his most personal films (and original work), would have a commentary on the filmmaking process.
            Doing press for the film, Nolan mentioned that the main cast represents key roles in the filmmaking process.  Cobb is the director, Mal represents the parts of the director that she or he puts into the film (Cobb’s children is a metaphor for the film being a director’s “baby”), Arthur is the producer/DP, Ariadne is the production designer, Eames is the actor, Yusuf is visual effects director, Saito is the studio executive and Fisher represents the audience. It is through Fisher’s role that Nolan’s commentary and filmmaking pedagogy is displayed.
            Through Fisher’s actions and the way that the other characters interact with him Nolan is commenting on the nature and power of film itself. Like Fisher, the audience is the target for the filmmaker, to make them believe in a particular situation.  Sometimes this can be heavy handed through the use of exposition and a common mistake of telling the audience something rather than showing them.  Nolan brilliantly parodies this in Inception when the team runs the “Mr. Charles Gambit” on Fisher making him aware that he is dreaming.




             As in the clip, the filmmaking technique to make the audience aware that they are watching a movie (taking them out of the experience) is risky. But when it is done properly, as I think Nolan does here, it can get the audience to go along with you on the journey, the way that Fisher joins the team in the second level of the dream state; working with the filmmakers to construct a new situation. Nolan seems to suggest that the willingness for people to be a film audience presupposes that they are (usually) on the side of the filmmakers; wanting to suspend disbelief and be transported through storytelling.  This is similar to Goffman’s use of teamwork to create a social situation (see above). In fact, the title card at the end of the film reveals that you, the audience, have just experienced inception by watching the film.  The idea of the story has been successfully implanted in your head, and no one knows, not even the filmmakers, how the story will affect you; it could be a minuscule form of entertainment or it could completely change your whole social viewpoint. For Nolan, that is the true power of film.

PRODUCTION



Script
            As was mentioned earlier, the script took 10 years to complete. Originally written as a spec script presented to the studio after Insomnia Nolan opted to work on it a bit more, fleshing out the dream world by constructing diagrams of the levels of the dreams and solidifying the rules of this universe.  To that end, Nolan only mentions the origin of the shared dreaming technology once, in what seems like a throwaway line Arthur says:

            “Shared dreaming was originally designed by the military to allow soldiers to simulate combat. They could kill each other over and over again without getting hurt.”

As a sociologist, I find this deeply intriguing. This seems so plausible that it scares me. It makes me wonder if Nolan is trying to make some type of veiled social commentary about the military and technology, much in the same way he gives the same sort of commentary about terrorism, and social class in the later films of The Dark Knight Trilogy. To me this statement could be easily applied to the way that the US military uses military video games as both a recruitment tool, and a way for current soldiers to brush up on battle tactics, hand eye coordination, and desensitization to violence and war.

Visual F/X

            Like his previous films, Nolan does not use a second unit.  All of the shots are composed by Nolan and Director of Photography Wally Pfister.  To that end, there is a level of consistency throughout all of Nolan films. There is never a shot or a sequence that seems out of place or not to Nolan’s sensibilities. In this film, what I found interesting is the way that Nolan frames the dream world. I can only imagine how much of a challenge this must have been, balancing the abstract nature of dreaming with the structure of the film so that the audience isn’t alienated.  This seems to be a bit easier for a director like Nolan who consistently uses a non-linear story structure, which lends itself to be able to tell a story set in the dreamscape.
            Another Nolan trade mark is the greater use of practical effects over CGI.  The biggest asset used in the practical effects of Inception is air cannons.  Air cannons were used to simulate the destruction of the Paris café, and the kick that Cobb receives in the beginning of the film.  The practical effects team even used cherry pickers and black screens to track and block out the sun when they were shooting a rain scene in sunny downtown LA during the summer of 2009.  
The greatest example of the use of practical effects is the gimble used in the rotating hallway scene. Inspired by Kubrick’s use of the rotating set in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Team Nolan created a hallway set (simulating the second level of the Dream, Arthur’s level) that was able to rotate 180 degrees. Cameras were mounted on the set to give the feeling of the rotation of the room, while a crane mounted camera was uses to get the stable wide shots making the action seem like it was taking place in shifting gravity.[7]
When the scene eventually shifts from rotating gravity to zero gravity Team Nolan broke the sequence up into three segments; in each segment they used a different rig to simulate the weightlessness, effectively hiding the camera tricks from the audience. It is sequences like this prove Nolan and Pfister to be amazing filmmakers and supports Pfister being garnered with an Oscar for his work on the film.  Special mention needs to be given to the dedication and stamina of Joseph Gordon-Levitt who did the majority of his stunts in this scene.  Gordon-Levitt was on the rotating set (having to learn a complex fight choreography in the process) and on each of the three different rigs used in the zero gravity scene in order to maintain the investment of the audience in the situation.





Music

Once again, Hans Zimmer is charged with bringing musicality and lyrical life to Nolan’s films.  Using the foundation of an Edith Pilaf song (who Marion Cotillard played in La vie En Rose to win an Oscar) heard in the film Zimmer constructs this masterpiece:



However is a common misconception that Zimmer wrote this piece used in the third trailer



Direction

It is a shame that Nolan wasn’t even nominated for a best directing Oscar for this film. The film was nominated for a much deserved best picture Oscar, although I assume this was a political move because The Dark Knight wasn’t nominated for best picture in 2008. The directing techniques used in this film to maintain such a complex story a float while being able deliver spectacular set pieces needs to be recognized and it consistently makes me angry that Nolan has been passed over time and time again for much deserved recognition. The fact that Nolan has NOT been honored in this way, proves to me that American cinema, and the majority of American audiences, have lost the desire for the filmmaking craft and just want to see paper thin stories held together by blurry CGI nonsense. YES! I am looking at YOU Zack Snyder and Michael Bay!

CONCLUSION

 This is my favorite, non-Batman Nolan film to date. It is also one of the most Sociological films I have reviewed to date. It is a great film with complexity of characters and story that does not pander to the lifeless idiot masses that are just looking for escapism. Nolan returns us to the craft of filmmaking that is rapidly eroding through the use of technology, sluggish box office results, and unwillingness of the audience to be enthralled. It is my hope, with Interstellar Nolan will be able to capture the magic of the film in such a way that ushers in a new era of well-crafted and critically successful filmmaking.



[1]  Herbert Blumer (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. p. vii
[2]  Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge New York: Anchor Books.
[3] The individuals, organizations and institutions that assist in the process of socialization throughout the life course (trajectory) of an individual. They include: The family, daycare, schools, peer groups, the workforce and the media.
[4] Jean Kilbourne (1999). “Socialization and the Power of Advertising” In Seeing Ourselves: Readings in Sociology 7th edition eds. Nijole Benekrautis New York: Pearson.
[5] Erving Goffman (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life New York: Anchor Books
[6] Taste is the idea that through the consuming of products, entertainment and other aspects of culture, a person can maintain a false impression. The careful manipulation/display of taste, can result in having a false consciousness to your actual social position in society.
[7] Geek Aside: The fight choreography that takes place in the rotating hallway and in simulated zero gravity it excellent. It is full of practical real world and useful martial arts techniques: the taisabaki throw, brush, grab strike (aka hand pass) wrist locks and ground fighting front guard top choke. Bravo!  

Monday, September 1, 2014

Avatar: The Last Airbender Book 1: Water Review


INTRO

     Created by Michael DiMartino and Brian Konietzko,   Avatar: The Last Airbender is one of the greatest animated shows ever created.  Although originally conceived and marketed as strictly a "kids show" by distributing it through Nickelodeon studios and originally airing it on Saturday mornings; Avatar became a show for all ages with its complex layered story lines (involving season long story arcs,) and  integrated rich character development while weaving religious (Buddhism) and Philosophical themes throughout its three season run. The show did not pander, and treated its audience like adults. To that end,  Avatar: the last Airbender is an excellent example (if not the paragon) of a racial diverse, post modern, pro feminist show that deals with current social issues as told through the lens of a fantastical world. 

PREMISE

        Avatar: The Last Airbender is set in an ancient world heavily influenced by Chinese Mythology.  In this world the earth is divided into four different nation based upon the four natural elements ( water, earth, fire and air). There is the Northern and Southern Water tribes, The Earth Kingdoms of Ba Singh Se and Omashu, The Fire Nation and The Air Nomads.  Each of these nations have a culture and rituals that is influenced by their totemic element. Additionally,  members of these nations are often born with the ability to manipulate their respective element. This behavior is called "bending". 
        The titular "Avatar" is a single person in the whole world who can "bend" and master all four elements. Having a life cycle of 170 years, the Avatar acts as a spiritual leader, guide and general force for peace in the world (i.e. The Dali Lama). At the end of an Avatar's life (by natural or unnatural causes) she or he is reincarnated into the next element/nation in "the Avatar Cycle" (see above).This not only allows the Avatar to live on throughout history, the cycle of reincarnation allows the Avatar the ability to tap into the power of all her/his past lives at a single moment. This is called "The Avatar State"    
    
     BOOK 1: WATER. 

Plot   

     Book: 1 Water Begins 100 years after The Fire Nation declared war on the entire world. Avatar Aang (a 12 year old boy of the Air Nomads) and his animal spirit guide Appa, a flying bison, are released from a hundred year hibernation in an iceberg by Katara, and Sokka: siblings of the Southern Water Tribe. After some spiritual guidance from one of his past lives (Avatar Roku) Aang learns that he must master all four elements and confront Fire Lord Ozai before the end of summer which hails the return of Sozin's Comet which gives any Fire bender unbelievable power, a power that was previously used to wipe out all of the Air Nomads 100 years earlier to start the war.
       Having only mastered the element of air, Aang and Appa, together with Katara, Sokka,and a flying lemur named  Momo, must travel to the Northern Water Tribe to find a Waterbending Master so Aang can learn the next element in the cycle. Their journey is complicated by Prince Zuko the banished son of Ozai that seeks the Avatar in order to return to the Fire Nation and regain his honor. 



 BOOK 1: WATER ANALYSIS 

  A Rough Start

         The beginning of any show is always a period of adjustment as the creators attempt to find their footing,  solidify their tone in relationship to the theme they want to present, while creating and maintaining audience interest. Avatar was no different.  In the beginning, (especially the first few episodes) the show focused on child friendly humor of sight gags, physical comedy and small amounts of toilet humor. There was also little to no reference to the story complexity, religious and philosophical themes that populated the later seasons. Additionally, the early episodes animation was blurred and unclear (as they weren't yet digitally producing the show's animation in HD).   While this was a a bit rough on an older audience when it first aired, it was a hit with the younger audience.
         Yet, in retrospect, it is refreshing to see the characters that you fall in love with at the beginning of their journey, full of hope, and humor considering all that will happen to them later.  Thus upon multiple viewings, these earlier episodes are enriched with the audience knowledge of the future.  You start to see all of the seeds that the creators planted that pay off one or even two seasons later.

Some of the best Seeds in Book 1:

Iroh redirecting Lighting for the first time in the series



Azula!!!!



Suki and the Kyoshi Warriors


Bumi

Jet and the Freedom Fighters 






Wan Shi Tong's Library 


 The Bending Arts 




        In the Avatar: The Last Airbender universe all of the bending arts are based on different types of Chinese martial arts. The creators of the show had the martial art bending form be a representation of each Nations respective element.  Therefore each martial art bending form represented one of the four bending elements. Tai Chi with it's focus on  fluid movements is the basis for Water-bending. Hung-ga with its ideas of soft (Crane) and Hard (Tiger) power that is rooted to the ground is the basis for Earth-bending. Northern Style Shaolin  with its dynamic movements and linear movement encompasses Fire-Bending Finally, Bagua has a lot of circular movements and deflecting strikes that makes it perfect for Air-bending.
         Throughout the rest of the series other martial art forms are brought in to either explain a particular person's unique use or ability to bend the elements that maybe outside the standard styles listed above. Or they explain a form of fighting in the Avatar  universe that does not involve the bending of the elements. In Book 1, one such fighting style is that of the Kyoshi Warriors. Their style of fighting is based upon the redirection of a persons momentum and force focusing on keeping their opponent off balance, they also use Fans, shields and Katanas; which makes their fighting style a combination of Aiki-juitsu,  Tessenjutsu (war fan) and Battojutsu (art of the Katana).  This also means that this is one of the few fighting styles in the Avatar universe that is based on Japanese Martial arts styles.  Author's opinion: They are Bad Ass.

Evidence:



SOCIAL ANALYSIS 

Race and Ethnicity

            Avatar is one of the few american shows with a principle cast of characters that are all non-white. Each nation in this world is based on an Asian and Pacific Islander Ethnicity (API). Through a careful analysis of the way each character is drawn, and the cultural customs and rituals they adhere to, it is clear that each Nation's ethnicity has the following primary cultural influences: The Fire Nation are Chinese, The Earth Kingdoms are Mongolian, The Water Tribes are based on the Inuit and Eskimo cultures and the The Air Nomads are Tibetan. Additionally, as previously mentioned, Kyoshi island is proxy for Japan
           However, even though each nation has a primary culture that they draw upon many other diverse Asian culture practices. From ideas of filial piety, honor, shame, cycle of life, and the balance of nature that we see in the series all come from eastern philosophical teachings (Taoism, the I Ching, Buddhism etc). Additionally, some of the practices performed by certain leadership the Avatar Universe such as a coup, totalitarianism, censorship of information often parallel governmental practices of China and North Korea. 
         Looking more deeply into these real world parallels it becomes clear that there is an allegorical similarity between The Fire Nations genocide of the Air Nomads and the current real world conflict between  China and Tibet. The historical conflict between the Mongolians and China is inverted in the Avatar  universe; positioning China (The Fire Nation) as the Invading army and the Mongols (The Earth Kingdom of Ba Singh Se) protecting themselves behind a "great wall". (* though alluded to in Book 1, these become major events during Book 2)  Thirdly, the size and political social power of the Inuit and Eskimo cultures in the world today ( only 120,000 people identify as such in only three countries: Greenland, Canada and the United States) is paralleled by The Water Tribes in the world of Avatar. 



          Unfortunately, when the film adaptation of Book 1 was produced, written and directed by M. Night Shyamalan all of the protagonists were portrayed by white actors and the antagonists were portrayed by middle eastern or Indian actors. A gross misrepresentation of the diversity of the show this lead to a huge public outcry and resurgence of activism around the "white washing" of racially diverse characters in film and TV now re-dubbed Racebending

Feminism

   Throughout the whole of the series, Avatar: The Last Airbender consistantly, (and pretty excellently) defys socialized gender norms, stereotypes and promotes gender bending outside of the binary system of gender classification (otherwise known as The Gender box model).  Many of the protagonist show a layered and contexual gender identity that is a part of their personality Consistently, the show features multi- faceted male and female characters that move beyond the socialized male/female, masculine/feminine dichotomy. Three prime examples are the Book 1 protagonists of Aang, Katara, and Sokka.
     Aang is written and portrayed as a non-violent pacifist (given his training by the monks) who is emotionally invested in the balance of nature and its animal inhabitants.  Aang's masculinity is not based in violence,or  bravado but in caring and compassion for all life.  This compassion is his reason to fight when he has to (in self defense) but only when all other avenues of diplomacy have been exhausted.  In Book 1, we see Aang's natural airbending nature is to avoid and evade. And in later seasons he has a problem with facing a problem head on and standing his ground. (more on that later).
     Katara is the heart of the group she perfectly balances the complexities of modern femininity. She is the person that actively challenges the archaic sexism that her culture is steeped in the ways that she openly argues with her brother and, at the end of Book 1, challenges an old (male) waterbending master's sexism, by dueling him...and is able to change his mind. Katara is fiercely loyal to her friends and family she is able to both stand her ground and fight but also be a healer.


      It is through Sokka that the show really expresses its feminist message in Book 1. It is Sokka's reformation from sexism to gender equality that solidifies the show's egalitarian message. In the first few episodes of the series he expresses the socialized sexism of his culture.  As the episodes progress, and his sexist notions of the "weakness" of women are proven inaccurate time and time again, (by his interactions and relationships with (Katara, Suki, and Yue) Sokka slowing starts to embrace the show's message of feminism (even going so far as training with the all female Kyoshi Warriors and protesting the lack of female agency of arranged marriages) by Book's end.
   
The Feminism of Avatar has been written on extensively and This section will be expanded on in a separate post about Feminism in Avatar after the three book review has been completed. Until that time, read This, This and this.

Favorite Episodes in Book 1:

1) King of Omashu (BUMI!!!)
2) The Warriors of Kyoshi ( 'Nuff said)
3) The Waterbending Master (See fight above)
4) The Blue Spirit ( character development and great action)
5) Siege of the North parts 1 and 2 (Season finale Show finds its footing)


CONCLUSION

While I believe Book 1 of Avatar to be the weakest of the show's three seasons, it is still better than 95% of material that has been produced. Its shaky start gives way to a solid foundation by books end. That foundation, at its core is about character, feminism, equality and diversity.  This foundation that is built upon with the superb Book 2: Earth that is considered the shows equivalent of  The Empire Strikes Back.