Showing posts with label Studio Ghibli. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Studio Ghibli. Show all posts

Saturday, December 7, 2019

The Films of Hayao Miyazaki: Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind





The Second film in my analysis of The Films of Hayao Miyazaki is the post-apocalyptic fantasy  Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind This is the film that put Miyazaki and his team on the map allowing him to develop and create his own studio. While not known at the time, but Nauscicca embodies everything that we have come to identify as quintessentially “Miyazaki”. Many of the elements, themes and struggles in the film become a standard template for Miyazaki films in the future, eventually identifying as Miyazaki’s signature. Thus, it is through the film’s plot, context (both social and historical), and various themes that make Nausicaa the first pure Miyazaki film.




THE (NEAR) BIFURCATION OF MIYAZAKI
When looking at the totality of Miyazaki’s work, much like a lot of categorizations, you can divide most of Miyazaki’s work in to one of two categories based upon their intended audience. There are Miyazaki films that are more clearly marketed for adults (dealing with heavier themes and darker subtext) and those films that are marketed to children (the films that are socialization tools that have strong and powerful messages for what it means to be an adult usually involving young children as the protagonist).


Miyazaki Films for Adults                                       Miyazaki films for Children
Castle of Cagliostro (1979)                                        Castle in the Sky (1986)
Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind (1984)                 My Neighbor Totoro (1988)
Porco Roso (1992)                                                      Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)
Princess Mononoke (1997)                                         Ponyo (2008)
Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)                                     Spirited Away (2001)
The Wind Rises (2013)                                                How Do I Live? (2020)

However, because binaries are unequal social constructs that have been proven time and again to not fit the complex diversity of reality; it can be argued (correctly in my opinion) that many of these Miyazaki films straddle the line between being solely for adults or exclusively for children. In fact, many of his films involve children as the protagonists, but also has them confront very adult ideas of work, life, and existence. Therefore, while the methodology of this list is an easy shorthand for discerning the more dramatic of Miyazaki’s stories compared to those that are more lighthearted, all of Miyazaki’s films can be enjoyed by all.

          



     PLOT
1000 years after the collapse of industrialization and the “7 days of fire” that covered the planet, Humanity is divided into large “Kingdoms” which are interlocked in battle between themselves and the environment which is personified by the Ohm, large trilobite creatures that, in fits of rage  attack the humans. The air is toxic and the spores of the forest jeopardize the meager civilizations that have survived. The titular Nausicaa is the Princess of the Valley of the Wind, one of the human Kingdoms that is positioned in a valley closest to the sea. Its constant breeze and lush forest protect the kingdom from the toxic spores that have been known to invade and destroy a civilization. This is all put in jeopardy when waring rival kingdoms invade the Valley seeking an ancient weapon that will suppress the toxic forest and allow one kingdom total supremacy.  Nausicaa must act as a bridge between the forest and humanity, quelling tension and aggression on both sides and needing to find the most direct and efficient way to achieve long lasting peace. 



HISTORICAL CONTEXT
          
   (re)gaining trust
            Miyazaki’s previous film  The Castle ofCagliostro was not well received at the box office regardless of wining the prestigious Ofuji Noburo Animation Award[1] in part due to the way that Miyazaki “softened” the Lupin characters so that they would not seem so nihilistic or sexist. Many people chided that it was not “the real” (or to be more accurate) “their” Lupin[2]. As a result of this backlash, and poor box office performance Miyazaki’s subsequent film ideas could not get any traction at any major animation studio. He was seen as too big of a risk.  Therefore, as a proof of concept he published the two volume Manga version of Nausicaa beginning in 1979, first published in 1982. The Manga was a huge success (selling over 11 million copies) which paved the way for the film adaptation.
           
  Leaving it all on the field
The constant setbacks, detours and delays that Miyazaki and his team experienced attempting to bring Nausicaa to fruition left them feeling disillusioned. This despondence and trepidation was well warranted. Miyazaki and his team had yet to establish themselves (Takahata’s ground breaking film Grave of the Fireflies only gets made until after Nausicaa’s success) and they were worried that if Nausicaa was received as well as Castle of Cagliostro, no one else would allow them to make another film. Thus, feeling that this may be their only shot at expressing themselves they began to lace Nausicaa with all of the values, beliefs, ideals, and tropes that would become a signature of the then forthcoming Studio Ghibli and Miyazaki in particular.
          
     


    Warriors of the Wind
            While the film did very well in a majority of the international Markets in the United States, the distribution companies of Manson International and Showmen, Inc edited and recut Miyazaki’s original film into what they titled Warriors of the Wind. This recut/edit of the film not only changed the focus away from Nausicaa to more of an ensemble piece[3]; it also cut out 25 minutes of footage. This lead to a lot of the themes being lost or changed (particularly those about female empowerment and environmentalism).Including:
·         In this version the Ohm are seen and understood only as aggressive antagonists
·         The titular “warriors” use the “God warrior” to destroy the Ohm
·          All of the character development for Nausicaa (Now called Princess Zandra) was cut

Bring completely dissatisfied with the actions of the US distributors, Miyazaki mandated final cut for all of his projects once Studio Ghibli was created. This was to make sure that he could control the fate of his finished films and make sure that audiences could view his film in the way that he had intended.





SOCIAL CONTEXT
In taking a critical sociological perspective on Miyazaki’s films and specifically Nausicaä one gets the sense through both his Manga, and the film that he believes that film has a duty to say something about the world in an attempt to make it better than how he left it.  As indicated in my introduction to Miyazaki’s work he often wrestles with the feeling and self-perception that he has not done enough for the world, that his films are nothing compared to the real work that needs to be done.[4] Yet, through his films complex themes and a focus and representation of femininity and a divergent look at the “ Princess culture”, Miyazaki, through his films, has provided progressive cultural messaging that is the foundation of any progressive social policies or social justice movement. In Nausicaä specifically, because they were  unsure of its success and longevity they packed the film with a dense variety of themes, that he eventually spreads out in his later films.





Anti Capitalism/ Industrialism
In Nausicaa’s opening narration, we are known that it is a thousand years since the collapse of industrialization. The basic sociological understanding of history points to the correlation between the rise of industrialization and early capitalism. The idea that the industrial technology shifted how we live (from a pre-modern era to a modern era) that it created new social and cultural norms, ways of behavior that allowed capitalism as an economic system to grow, and thrive.

This summation of Marx and Weber’s thoughts on the subject can provide some illustration:

Marxio 



   
Is Capitalism Bad For You?





While we don’t get a full explanation as to what happened to cause the fall of industrialization or what truly happened during the “Seven days of Fire”. Though I would assume due to the collusion between Capitalism, Industry and the Military and the endless wars that we (especially the United States) fight it is conceivable and some might even say inevitable that we will eventually destroy ourselves. This is something Miyazaki understood all too well.

In Nausicaä, Miyazaki discusses ancient biological weapons that were stock piled and used against warring factions that we can assume led to the aforementioned “7 days of fire”. These weapons are clear allegories to the nuclear bomb (something Japaneseanimation has always been obsessed with).  Being born in 1941, Miyazaki found the experience of WWII and the bombs informative as a child, and then used the ancient weapons as a way that he could talk about the dangers of nuclear proliferation…which is also a product of the toxic, unregulated, late stage capitalism.    







Environmentalism
                     

   …Industrial civilizations sprawl across the face of the planet plundering the soil of its riches fouling the air, and remolding life forms at will. Cities burned, welling up as clouds of posion…Almost all of the surface of the earth was transformed into a sterile wasteland  Hayao Miyazaki Nausicaä Manga



It is through this quote in the opening cover of the first volume that lays out the beginning of Miyazaki’s thesis on environmentalism that would eventually span a number of his films.  Here Miyazaki is drawing a direct causation between industrialization and environmental destruction. According to Jorgensen et al[5] (2018) the current drivers of climate change are economic systems (capitalism as previously mentioned) and Consumption. Our consumption practices, especially for energy are dangerously unsustainable which fuels environmental depletion.
-          
       The US is 4.5% of the world’s population
-          But it makes up 21.8% of the global energy use
-          31.8% of industrial consumption
-          39.6% of residential and commercial energy purposes
-          28.6% of the world’s transportation consumption


This equates that the US alone consumes an average of 40% of Global resources.
This desire for resources has led to practices of acquiring those resources quickly and cheaply that are often damaging to the environment, practices that have a long history dating back to Industrialization: Burning coal, deforestation, strip mining, offshore drilling. Unfortunately, the US is often the model for global capitalist success. Which means that other newly industrialized countries like China, are following similar industrial practices as the United States, with greater production and reckless environmental abandon.

Mark Maslin addresses this in his book Climate Change: a Very Short Introduction when he states:


 “Climate change challenges the very economic theories that have dominated global economics for the last 35 years and that we need to build a new [economic and] political system that will allow collective action and more equal distribution of wealth, resources and opportunities.” P 172


This is because industrialization and capitalism has created value in cultural ideas skills and behaviors that result in environmental destruction.  

-          Just 4 % of big five energy producers went to renewable energy research and implementation [6]
-          Climate deniers often manufacture the threat that being eco-friendly is a threat to Capitalism. This was the same excuse that was leveed against abolitionists, The occupy movement about redistribution and any kind of substantive change
-         
      The Solution to the modern ecological problem is:  the radical reordering of our economic political systems that are antithetical to the “free market” belief system[7]
-          We need to plan economies based upon collective priorities and need rather than corporate profitability. This the way that the sustainability becomes Macro in focus
-           To accomplish this, it takes strong Government action at all levels

In the context of Miyazaki, It is fascinating to see that during the time that we gain the ability to measure our impact on the environment[8], Miyazaki also gives us this film as an environmentalist cautionary tale. Through Nausicaä, Miyazaki removes all sub text, and in the text of the film states the importance of the forest to the air quality of the kingdom; positioning Nausicaa’s kingdom as geopolitically valuable due to the wind being able to keep the poisonous spores from festering.  The later revelation that it was the forest that is trying to clean the air of pollutants and save humanity is a mic drop of a conclusion.  






Feminism/ Female Empowerment (better princess culture)
            Miyazaki has always been interested in telling stories about the empowerment and humanity of young girls and women. This has led Miyazaki and his work to be embraced by feminists. As well he should, as he has always been positioned as the antithesis to a western princess culture. Also, it is difficult in the increasing corporatization of (the princess) culture through the Disney monolith that has commodified all aspects of the childhood of multiple generations to find something that is not reinforcing tired stereotypes on the next generation or weaponizing them through nostalgia for adults today.

             Like the trees in Nausicaä, Miyazaki films act as a barrier of protection against this homogeneous toxicity by having the radical idea that women are three-dimensional people.  And while, yes, the monolith[9] is learning some better lessons these days, the change is usually motivated by profit rather than altruism; and the changes that they make are ultimately derivative of Miyazaki from 30 years ago.

EXAMPLE: REY IS NAUSICCA



EXHIBIT A



EXHIBIT B






  
                                                           
CONCLUSION
            Nausicca of the Valley of the Wind is one of the best princess films in existence and it acts as the proof of concept for Miyazaki’s entire career with the establishment of Studio Ghibli. A studio which is not motivated by profit, and seeks to only be able to make enough money to keep the lights on, and the creators working.  Nausicca has everything that is essential to a Miyazaki film. It is a film that represents the essence of its creator/director that it is the film that encapsulates his feelings on the world.   See it. Own it. Share it.                                                                     


[1] Miyazaki would go on to win this award an additional four times in his career with Nausicaa, Castle in the Sky, Totoro, and Ponyo also winning this award.  
[2] You see this happen even today whether that be the “release the Snyder cut” weirdos or the petition for The Last Jedi to no longer be canon.
[3] The cover adds a lot more men to the story that are not in the original film.
[4] In Sociology, there is a concept put forth by Charles H. Cooley called reference groups. These are individuals living or dead that we use to regulate and evaluate our own behavior. In reading about how Miyazaki feels that he has yet to do something significant makes me wonder who is in his reference group. In other words: who is he comparing himself to that feels so inadequate?
[6] Naomi Klein (2011) “Capitalism vs. The Climate.” The Nation
[7] Naomi Klein (2011) “Capitalism vs. The Climate.” The Nation
[8] We gain the ability to measure atmospheric CO2 in the 1980’s
[9] Disney

Sunday, July 21, 2019

The Films of Hayao Miyazaki: Lupin the Third: The Castle of Cagliostro








                The first film in my analysis of the films of Hayo Miyazaki is the excellent adventure classic Lupin the Third: The Castle of Cagliostro. This marks the first feature film directorial debut for Miyazaki where, like Christopher Nolan on the film Insomnia, he was more of a director for hire for a film that was already slated for production. However, unlike Nolan, Miyazaki was able to be both writer, chief animator and storyboard artist which allowed him greater creative control than Nolan had. Thus, this film, as with a lot of directors that reach such acclaim as Miyazaki, is a prototype for future work; and therefore has a lot of the concepts, elements and ideas that will be fleshed out in future films. With Miyazaki, this film is a resounding trumpet that leads to the development of not only his own style, but of his own studio; the famed Studio Ghibli.

PLOT

Master thief Arsene Lupin III and his right hand man Diasuke Jigen rob a bank in Monaco. As they are celebrating their victory Lupin realizes that the money they stole are legendary forgeries called “goat bills”. Once they dump the fake currency, they travel to the supposed birthplace of the counterfeit cash, the grand duchy of Cagliostro; a place Lupin had attempted to rob before (10 years prior) but was thwarted by the palace guards and heavy security.
Once in the region, Lupin and Jigen interrupt an escape attempt/kidnapping of Lady Clarisse. After which Lupin enlists the help of his second partner Goemon Ishikawa, Super spy Fujiko Mine and Inspector Koichi Zenigata, (the INTERPOL agent that is always trying to catch Lupin) in order to rescue Clarisse and find out the secrets of the Cagliostro Castle.



HISTORICAL CONTEXT

The film Castle of Cagliostro is based on the characters in the “Lupin the Third” Manga created by Monkey Punch in 1967.  In 1971 one of Miyazaki’s first animation jobs was to direct episodes for the Lupin the third tv series. When Miyazaki moved from A-Pro studios to TMS entertainment in 1979, he was given the chance to write, storyboard and direct what was at the time only the second “Lupin” film (The first being “The Mystery of Mamo”). It is under Miyazaki’s direction that this film not only becomes one of the best Lupin films, it also marks as a drastic change from the characters both in the manga as well as the previous and any subsequent Lupin films. In this way Miyazaki shows his talent for character and strong storytelling that eventually becomes a major influence for some of the important animators over the next thirty years.

Characters and their ‘Cagliostro’s iterations (Spoilers ahead)

            The depiction of the Lupin the third characters in Castle of Cagliostro is a radical departure than how they have been represented before or since in various media properties. In many of these other (lesser) depictions, the characters are often selfish, cynical, and morally ambiguous to such a degree that to watch them with any kind of sociological or critical eye is difficult, leaving the critic angry and/or having to make excuses for character behavior by delegitimizing the property as nothing more than fiction. Therefore, there is something to be gleaned from a brief comparison between how the main characters are usually depicted and Miyazaki choses to depict them in his film.



            Arsene Lupin  III
           
            It is through Lupin himself that Miyazaki provides the most divergent take. In the manga and other films (not directed by Miyazaki) Lupin is an ego-centric, lecherous morally bankrupt violent killer.[1] He is always thinking about his next score, women, or living up to the memory of his thief ancestor. He often puts his “friends” in compromising situations that make them have to defend themselves. This is especially true with his relationship with Fujiko Mine which is often depicted as violent often suggestive of rape and sexual harassment.
            The Cagliostro Lupin, while portrayed as one that flirts and is described as a “ladies man” at one point. The focus of the story is Lupin helping Clarisse because he owes her for saving his life, and not because he wants to sleep with her. In fact, the film goes out of its way at several points to show just how uninterested he is in Clarisse. In the films initial chase sequence Lupin does not go after Clarisse until he realizes that she is being chased by armed men. Secondly, after the film’s climatic sequence, as Lupin and Clarisse are talking Clarisse is willing to leave with Lupin and become a thief. He gently refuses and leaves with his compatriots.
 It is also interesting to note that all of the behavior that is characteristic of Lupin in other iterations is embodied in Cagliostro’s villain. At several points in the film, The Count is called lecherous, devious, and untrustworthy and is shown on several occasions to be violent, devoid of humanity, and in one sequence, blood thirsty. Thus, when he dies a gruesome death (crushed by large clock hands) it serves as a strong critique of those character traits.
By contrast, this makes the Cagliostro version of Lupin the antithesis of how he exists in other forms. Miyazaki’s Lupin is the thief with a heart of gold, he is noble and honest with a clear moral center. By this simple shift Miyazaki is not only infusing the character with a sensibility that Miyazaki would be more comfortable writing, but also putting his definitive stamp on the character, whose ideals and values show up in other characters in a lot of his later work.



Jigen and Goemon

            Two of the characters that get the least to do in Miyazaki’s Cagliostro are the characters of Daisuke Jigen and Goemon Ishikawa. While these characters have extensive backstories in the manga and in the subsequent films, even to the point where there are several films that focus on one or both of these characters. These rich backstories are not represented in Cagliostro, either because the said backstories had yet to be written at the time of the films production, or those details did not fit with the story that Miyazaki wanted to tell. Instead, Miyazaki decides to use them sparingly; each given a sequence or two of action while at other times literally being sidelined throughout several sequences. The greater victim of this is Goemon, of which little is known of in the film. All Miyazaki does is infuse him with the honor and nobility that is found in typical Samurai stereotypes.
Miyazaki does offer a little bit more dimension to Jigen from the beginning of the film through the films first two action sequences. In this the Cagliostro Jigen seems to be more loyal, less violent and certainly more friendly than his Manga counterpart These sequences play on the “best friend” relationship Jigen and Lupin seem to have[2] and show Jigen as an easy going, humorous fellow do-gooder thief. In this version, gone is the tragic backstory, the deep nihilism and bitterness that saturates a lot of the other stories (especially the ones that focus on Jigen). Much like with Lupin, these characteristics did not fit with Miyazaki’s sensibilities nor with the tone he wanted Cagliostro to have; therefore these traits were properly exorcised for the film.



Fujiko Mine

            Aside from Lupin, the character of Fujiko Mine is the most changed from her portrayal in the Manga and in the other non Miyazaki Lupin films. Originally, she was created to be a series of 2 dimensional female characters that were the “girl” to Lupin’s “Bond”. But Monkey Punch stated that rather than create different female characters all of the time, he just amalgamated all his ideas into one character. Because of her paper-thin origins, Fujiko, in almost every iteration is hyper sexualized (even appearing nude or near nude in several films) and the object of Lupin’s constant lust. She is often “damseled” and seen as of secondary importance. Miyazaki’s Fujiko is nothing of the sort, in fact that Fujiko can be seen as the proto-feminist template that Miyazaki will become known for in future films[3]
            In Castle of Cagliostro, we are introduced to Fujiko as a simple hand maiden, but quickly find out that she was sent to the region of Cagliostro to spy on the Count (for whom we are not quite sure). Throughout the course of the film we find out that Fujiko is not only adept at espionage, and a master of disguise but she is proficient in martial arts and military weapons and tactics.  When Fujiko decides to help with Clarisse’s escape Fujiko explains her history with Lupin to Clarisse. When Clarisse surmises that Lupin left her (and thereby breaking her heart). Fujiko corrects her with a smile stating how she left Lupin. In this one simple piece of dialogue it shows Fujiko as a “self-possessed women at the top of her field”[4] In this story, she is not there for Lupin, she does not follow Lupin, their paths just are intersecting at this particular point[5] and they diverge just as quickly at the end (when again she leaves causing Lupin to pursue her).  
 Over the years, (after the cultural impact of Cagliostro) Fujiko has been given some amount of agency (but it is usually only agency gained though sex) and some depictions showing her to be just as ruthless and violent as Lupin.  It is difficult to say how much of this agency that Fujiko eventual achieves was the original intention of Monkey Punch, or is the result of the acceptance and canonization of the Cagliostro story. Either way, Miyazaki’s Fujiko, with minimal screen time, is the most well rounded non sexualized depiction we have seen so far.   



Miyazaki before Ghibli
            An important aspect of trying to understand the historical context of this film and judging it accordingly is to understand that this is the first film of a (clearly) talented director before he became synonymous with the term Animation. It is in tis film were he is given creative control of the films production but was still hamstrung by the limitations of the Lupin IP. However, this along with his next feature, ignite the germ that would lead to the creation of one of the greatest animation studios in the world.



INFLUENCES    

Over the years, Miyazaki’s Lupin the Third: The Castle of Cagliostro is regarded as not only the aforementioned best of the Lupin films, it was once regarded by Steven Speilberg as one of the greatest adventure movies of all time[6] and may have been a inspiration for Indiana Jones. This is film is so well regarded that many homages to the film can be seen in other animated films and tv shows. The two most egregious examples of this are The Great Mouse Detective and the Clock King episode of Batman the Animated Series

 The Great Mouse Detective 


The Clock King:Batman:TAS









Partners with Disney

   Miyazaki has influenced, many animators and companies but no company more so than Disney. Many of the key animators at Disney through the late 1990’s through the 2000s have been influenced by Miyazaki’s work. However, it was the love of Miyazaki’s work ( and Cagliostro in particular ) that caused animator, executive and sexual harasser John Lasseter to convince the Disney company to be the international distributor of Ghibli films through the 2000’s to early 2011 when they sold it to GKIDS   
It is just unfortunate to note that people in the United States would not know of Miyazaki, or this film without Disney given its number of ethical and human rights violations the company suffers from. This stings especially when you consider the overall themes of Miyazaki’s work being in direct opposition to the corporate practices of a company that he influenced.   




CONCLUSION

This is my favorite Miyazaki film. I have been a champion for it since I saw it in early 2000. Unfortunately, regardless of its brilliance, it is often not included in boxed sets of Miyazaki’s work, nor is it considered one of the Studio Ghibli films. In fact, the blu-ray of this film is difficult to find. Yet, it is worth your time and analysis as this review, and others protest. 



[1] So much so that the content of the manga and some of the films had to be greatly censored
[2] Although not once does Jigen call Lupin “boss” an inflection and term of endearment that used in both the manga and the later films. While some would see this as doing a disservice to the character, I would consider this a extreme form of fan Nitpicking and what can lead to toxic fan culture

[3] Especially in Nausicca, his first film under Studio Ghibli
[4] To Quote the character of Ron Swanson from the television show  Parks and Recreation
[5] Earlier in the film Lupin states that he hasn’t seen Fujiko in over a year.
[6] Quote taken from the 2000 DVD release of Castle of Cagliostro