Thursday, June 1, 2023

A Decade with 'The Dojo': Ten Years, Top Ten Essays.

 





On June 19th 2023, The Sociologist’s Dojo blog will celebrate its 10th anniversary. In this brief paper, I will look back on the last ten years of Sociological film analysis, and give “The Dojo’s: Ten years, Top Ten essays.”  The criterion for this curated list is eclectic; some essays are chosen for their significance to the blog, others are selected because they are connected to specific historical events at the time, while others are selected because of personal interest, they are well written, or haven’t been viewed/read by many people.  

 


ORIGINS

The following story also recounted in Episode 1 of the Podcast, and the Episode 312: Zen and the White Male Savior in Film from The Social Breakdown Podcast

            The start of the blog began with my first viewing of Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel in June of 2013. Being such a Superman fan since I was a young child, and growing up on the Richard Donner/Christopher Reeve Superman, I could not believe that this paragon of goodness, the best reflection of humanity, was a bleakly morose brooding child whose parents tell them to let people die, including themselves, and that secrets, above everything else, are worth keeping. In addition to the now typical criticisms of wanton destruction, civilian deaths, and Superman murdering Zod…Krypton’s Sun was Yellow!!!

 

Zack Snyder's 'Man of Steel' is such a bloated, shaky, incoherent mess, it robs Superman of his majesty, grace, morality, and above all...hope. Snyder "accomplishes" this through a disjointed plot, two- dimensional/underdeveloped characters, poorly written dialogue, and sloppy direction. (Man of Steel Review)

 

The film was an abysmal mess, and I could not let it go. My rage did not subside as I started to think about the many ways that the film misrepresented the character of Superman. I began to think about what Superman was as a cultural product, and what the imagery of Superman represented in the public consciousness. Initially, I was doing this to provide some “evidence” and justification for my hatred of the film (not good research, to be certain). Yet, as I started to breakdown the character, applying concepts that I had learned from my expertise and training about masculinity and religion, I really got into thinking about film and popular culture in an academic way. So, I started a blog.

Externally, I told myself that the reason I chose the blog as the initial format for my content is because I wanted to be like Sociologist C. Wright Mills; to be a public intellectual and engage in “Public Sociology”. Public Sociology is a style of sociology that seeks to engage directly with the public to help foster more immediate and (possibly) greater social change. Internally, not unlike many of the egoistic fascist-like douche bag overtly masculine directors I despise, I wanted to keep “my vision” of the blog pure. Truthfully, I did not want to deal with the anxiety and feelings of rejection that come with academic publishing because I was afraid of rejection, and I did not want to deal with criticism. A self-published blog was the easiest way to achieve that.

What’s in a Name?

I chose the name “The Sociologist’s Dojo” for a couple of reasons. The first is that the name and the content represent my three main life passions: Sociology, the martial arts, and film and popular culture. All these things represent me, and my interests. Secondarily, aside from sounding cool, I asked the question: “Where is the Sociologist’s Dojo?” Where do they learn and train to hone their skills? We would traditionally see this to be in the ivory tower of academia, but in practice, it is within society. Sociologists are different than any other type of scientist in that we constantly participate in the very things that we study. Even we cannot escape cultural and social norms that we have been socialized to follow. The name is intended to reflect all of this.  

The Shifts in Focus

At the onset, the beginning of the blog had a much broader focus to cover comics, and martial arts. While some of the early essays reflect this broader scope, it was more so a starting point, raw materials that needed to be refined.

Trivia: The first post on the blog wasn’t an essay, it was a ‘Welcome’:

   Greetings all,

 

I created this blog as a space to discuss the things that I love: Sociology, Martial Arts, Superheroes, Books and Cinema.  This blog will focus on the social analysis of popular culture, Martial Arts and anything that I feel is "Geek" worthy.  Essentially, the posts that are to follow are going to be rants and/or raves about society, culture, social theory, martial arts, movies, and virtually anything else that comes into my head.

 

Enjoy :)

 

As I continued to refine my writing skills and find the voice of the blog, I began to narrow my focus to specifically film and popular culture. In that, I started to think about in-depth analysis of film from a Sociological Perspective which led to a shedding of a lot of comics and martial arts content, though it does come up again sporadically. One of the biggest shifts, early on, was the development of my ongoing series on a director’s filmography. In the ten years of the blog, I have covered the films of Christopher Nolan, Hayao Miyazaki, Karyn Kusama and The Chambara films of Akira Kurosawa. As this feature continues, I will attempt to do more Avant Garde and less mainstream directors, while trying to include as many women and people of color as possible. Also, I will not be covering the white male darlings of 70’s new Hollywood (Scorsese, Coppola, Lucas, Spielberg, Cameron, Kubrick).

Conversely, there were things that I have written about in the early days, that I will not do anymore or have moved away from. Early on, there were straight reviews for films with little Sociological analysis, such as the reviews for Guardians of the Galaxy, Gravity, or Transcendence (yeesh!). I eventually ended my straight reviews, without a specific Sociological bent to it with X-Men: Days of Future Past when I began to develop the (now) typical structure for the film review that can be found in the Analytical essay for James Mangold’s Logan.     Additionally, where I used to write a lot about the character of Batman, given “The Dark Knight Trilogy”, as of my essay on police brutality and popular culture during the 2020 protests (see below), I will no longer writing about Batman.


 


TEN YEARS, TOP TEN ESSAYS IN ‘THE SOCIOOLOGIST’S DOJO’

With each of the essays that I will highlight in this section I will give some greater context of the blog:

 


2013: Man of Steel Review Part II Analysis of an Icon

            Where it all started. This year saw the most essays written for the blog in a single year and started the director series with The Films of Christopher Nolan. This year, the essay that really stands out for me is the essay “’Man of Steel’ Review part II: Analysis of an Icon” the second part of my evisceration of Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel. This essay was the first breath of what the blog would eventually become. I also came back to this subject years later with the second Podcast episode “Sparring with Superman.”




2014: TFCN: The Dark Knight Rises

            During the second year of the blog the structure of the essays and the focus of the blog began to crystallize. But still there were less analytical essays and pieces on current pop cultural news that became too difficult to keep up with. This year also saw essays on the Michael Brown murder in Ferguson and an early review of Bong Joon Ho’s  Snowpiercer. The essay that is important out of this sophomore year is the essay on The Dark Knight Rises which signifies the solidification of the structure of the blogs essay analysis.     




 

2015: The Furious Age of Feminism: The Mad Max and Avengers' Gender Controversy

            The third year of the blog saw some misfires with the soft commitment to writing a “Comics Character Profile” This idea was later scrapped when I realized that I just wanted to write on one of my favorite characters: John Constantine. I later repeat this mistake in 2017. 2015 also had several “Sociological Alert essays on the Paris attacks, and Marriage Equality  as well as Rachel Dolezal and the Domestic Terrorism of Dylan Roof. I would often use the phrase “Sociology Alert” to convey that the essays would be more societal/current event focus and not localized to films (Last used in 2021). However, there was an intersection of current events and film with the very different blowback felt by Avengers: Age of Ultron and Mad Max: Fury Road each sexist and anti-feminist in nature. This is what let to that essay getting the spotlight.   




2016: The Machete Cut and the Diminishing Margin Utility of Star Wars

        Year four of the blog begins the lean years. This was a period of 3 years where I was building new curriculum, writing new degrees/courses and going through a personal crisis or two, that did not leave a lot of room for non-work-related fun essay writing. However, I still managed to write my “Trump Analysis Trilogy” three interlocking essays which served as my process for working through the events of the 2016 election.

 Part I: “Donald Trump and the Rise of Reality Politics”

 Part II: A ‘Trumped up’ Future: The Shaping of the 45th Presidency

 Part III: Racism, Donald Trump and the Price of Nostalgia  

Additionally, in the space of film and popular culture, we were amidst a new Star Wars Trilogy, and I decided to watch the original trilogy in the famed “Machete” order and realized that perhaps, I do not like Star Wars as much as I thought I did.  




2017: The Distilled and Sterilized Feminism of Wonder Woman

The beginning of the fifth year of the blog saw another awkwardly introduced, but never followed through, segment spotlighting Social theorists when all I really wanted to talk about was C. Wright Mills. I also wrote a bonus essay not included in the  “Trump Analysis Trilogy” discussing “Trump, Propaganda and Linguistic Imperialism” This year also saw the first essay of a new film by a director I had already covered (Nolan’s Dunkirk). Yet, the essay I chose to spotlight here, goes back to the misfire of Patty Jenkin’s Wonder Woman and how the character in the Zack Snyder DCEU did not work.  




2018: The Feminism of “Suspiria” terrifies the Patriarchy

            In 2018, the blog had a lot of firsts. It saw the beginning of the series on The Films of Hayao Miyazaki (that lasts for 2 and ½ years). This year was the first time something I wrote, “Zen and the Death of the White Male Savior.” got outside attention (From The Social Breakdown Podcast). This year also saw the first of the blog’s “Top Ten” lists, and the first time I saw Panos Cosmatoes’ Mandy  I have talked about Mandy a lot since that initial review. I have done a Bonus Commentary episode on the Podcast about it, and most recently, I was a guest on “Who’s There: A Horror Movie Fan Podcast talking about Mandy. So, I think it a bit self-indulgent to put this review, yet again, front and center. Instead, I am choosing Luca Guadagnino’s remake of “Suspiria” because anything that terrifies the Patriarchy that much, I. Absolutely. Love.   



   

2019: TFHM: Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind

            This year saw the continuation of analyzing Miyazaki films, and a look into the sociological relevance of the villain motivation in The Legend of Korra  Few essays were published during the calendar year 2019. I was experiencing the lead up to, and onset of, a personal crisis that lingered for years afterwards. I had to find out who I was again and what I wanted. Turns out, I wanted to analyze film and Popular culture by using the Sociological Perspective.  




2020: BLM, Batman and Police Militarization

            With my personal crisis in full swing, the COVID-19 pandemic hit, and I like most people, was under lockdown beginning in March of that year. I ended up not going back to my office and teaching in person for almost 2 years. However, with that time, I decided to recommit myself to the blog, promising myself to provide one essay a month, or at least 12 essays a year. This is a commitment I still hold to three years later. To that end, this year saw essays on a Comparison between Kurosawa’s High and Low and Bong Joon Ho’s Parasite, as well as the bulk of Miyazaki essays on Castle in the Sky, Totoro, Kiki’s, Porco Rosso, Princess Mononoke, and Spirited Away. I also wrote a “scathing” critique of the comic book film genre in defense of M. Night Shyamalan’s “Eastrail 177 Trilogy” as well as reviews of Birds of Prey and Akira.

In October of 2020, I started The Sociologist’s Dojo Podcast, with an equal commitment to one episode a month. As of this writing, I have published 31 episodes, 4 episodes recorded yet to be published and 3 episodes planned but still to be recorded. I have had the fortune to have great guests, many of them turning into friendships. Those that want to be on the Podcast contact me on Twitter or email me at thesociologistsdojo@gmail.com. Yet, given the context of the hellscape that was 2020, the essay I chose to highlight above reflects a part of that disruption.




2021: Vader’s Flesh is Sacred: Disability Personhood and Victimhood Through 80's Representations of Robots and Cyborgs

            The beginning of 2021 was a scramble to write something relevant to the Jan 6th Insurrection. After which, I finished up the Miyazaki series with Howl’s Moving Castle, Ponyo and The Wind Rises, Continuation of The films of Christopher Nolan with Tenet, and the start of “The Chambara Films of Akira Kurosawa”. This year I began to dip my toe in the academic publishing waters with a review of the documentary Crip Camp for the American Sociological Journal Teaching Sociology. I also wrote an article that was featured at the North East MLA conference on Disability and Capitalism among Horror Antagonists, and a essay on the brilliance of Nicolas Cage which I used as the basis for Episode 20 of the Podcast aptly titled “The Nic Cage Episode.”. The essay I chose to feature was inspired out of discussions with friend of the podcast Dr. Liz W. Faber, as they developed their ideas for their new book Robot Suicide: Death, Identity and AI. in Science Fiction.    





2022: A Gender Analysis Gemini: When Gender Socialization met the RomCom… / Police, ‘The Punisher’ and Performative Masculinity

The boon of recognition continued in 2022 as an essay I wrote in January of that year was reworked and published in the anthology Global Perspectives on the Liminality of the Supernatural From Animus to Zombi edited by the fantastic Dr. Rebecca Gibson, friend and frequent collaborator on the podcast. This year saw the finishing and bulk of The Chambara films of Akira Kurosawa ( Throne of Blood, Hidden Fortress, Yojimbo/Sanjuro, Kagemusha and Ran) and the Start of the Films of Karyn Kusama (with Girlfight and Aeon Flux). The two essays that I chose to highlight were essays that were a long time coming, some brewing for years (The romcom essay) others needing a catalyst (Uvalde school shooting) to provide enough motivation to write the essay.     




2023: Best so far: Death, Taxes, and Bureaucracy a Weberian Analysis of Kurosawa’s Ikiru  

2023 has been consumed by the completion of The Films of Karyn Kusama (Jennifer’s Body, The Invitation, Destroyer and a bonus essay on Season 1 of “YellowJackets”). The remainder of this year will see an essay analyzing Thema and Louise to commemorate the recent 4k Criterion release, and the start of “The Films of Ana Lilly Amirpour”. The essay I chose to highlight this year is my long gestating essay trying to talk about the aspect of Weberian theory in Kurosawa’s Ikiru.    

 



CONCLUSION

            Part of finding purpose in life is in the pursuit of marrying your work with your passions. I have dedicated my life to the study of society, and I love to write and discuss film and popular culture. I hope that my obsession and life’s mission has brought both my readers and my listeners some perspective and entertainment in equal measure. Late in my graduate study, a good friend of mine astutely professed that to know me, to talk to me, is both parts wisdom and absurdity in equal measure. I hope I have brought those qualities to my readers over these last ten years. For those who have stuck with me over the decade, I hope you can say that both the blog and my style have refined and gotten better. If not, thank you for riding the wave of quality over the years. Looking forward, I have no plans on ending this site or its mission. If life creeps and affects the frequency of publication, please be patient. Lastly, if you have only read my written work, please check out my Podcast. It is a lot of fun, and I talk to interesting people about film, popular culture, and their work.  Here’s to another 10 years of Sociological analysis of film and popular culture. Please join me, it will be an adventure. 😊